Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hiro

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17
211
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 07, 2016, 12:36:59 pm »
I am very very very sorry for the racist harrasment you had to deal with MSJ :(
In my life I have never encountered racism until I was a regular in the Internet.I have encountered Brown,Black,white,ginger and even a few Asian people and never did I saw any racism. Simply the idea of judging people based on their skin color is too stupid and inane for me to understand and still it is.Also I have to agree about the people getting easily offended thing ( no I don't mean you Hiro) the whole " black lives matter " movement for example is shockingly racist. Black lives??! WTF. All I know is you don't call someone black or white unless you are describing them. Does skin color really matter in anything? How can someone be that inane? Understanding how can someone judge another from their skin color is beyond my level of intelligence.Racism stops when people stop saying black and white people. This is it. Again I am sorry MSJ for what happened to you, I really am.

You do realize, - if you have taken the time to read my posts -, that I was not offended in the first place, right? Apparently just using the word 'racist' was enough for people to think I was, funny how that works, I mean: who is actually feeling offended? I do not feel the need to reiterate my points again. See the other thread.

However, just because you feel that skin color doesn't matter, does not mean that there is no racism in society at large. And actually, your description of Black Lives matter as being "shockingly racist" is rather ignorant and insensitive. You seriously haven't wondered why such a movement felt the need to raise their voice?


212
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 06, 2016, 11:10:49 am »
Great points, H. As alwaays, my question is how do break the chains of this mindset of us vs them?

MSJ, sorry, I didn't see this thread before. I have just posted a reply in the 'What are you watching' thread, was busy these past few days. I'll read this thread and respond as well. Regards.

213
General Misc. / Re: What are you watching?
« on: November 06, 2016, 11:08:01 am »
Its easy to be offended by anything. Harder to understand the intent.

That is the greatest statement of statements ever made. People rarely look at intent, just what is offensive to their own self's. I've found that the internet is the most offended space in the World. Its just so many different cultures interacting that someone is bound to be offended.

The question of intent was the whole point of my remark, as it was not about me being possibly offended. I did not make this up or read it somewhere on the internet. As Bakker points out, ignorance is blind. You need to take a closer look before you come up with ill-informed conclusions.

I'm sorry if you thought my post was aimed at you, it was not. I just think Wilshire made a great observation. And, then said it's what I see on the internet all the time. People are quick to be offended, quick to make assumptions. Especially now with these elections, I see a lot of this on Facebook. And it's sad, seeing life long friends judging each other over which candidate they support. Then, the ensuing name-calling of racist, bigot and on and on. Even me writing this post is an example of the conclusion you drew upon my post. I've always found it very hard to convey what I'm feeling or thinking over text, or on these forums. Guess I am just ill-suited to the task. I do prefer face to face communication over text or even on the phone. As I feel a lot can be lost in translation when you don't see non-verbal cues.

Anyhow, back to Wilshire's statement, it's what I feel is truly wrong in this world. Everyone seems to want to be offended or feel wronged in some way. Just look at your Facebook and tell me If what you see is mostly negative or positive. I know what I see, negativity, an unwillingness to work through problems and create a better world. I see division everywhere anymore and it's sad, very sad.

Look, I absolutely agree with you that real life, face to face communication is always preferable than communication via machines. And I agree that division is unfortunately indeed the tenor of the time.

Within the context of this thread, I thought that your comment was aimed at what I had written. Which was misconstrued, as I tried to point out later. And it seems like it still is. Referring to aliens as contributing to building the pyramids is in itself a loaded line of thought, whether one is aware of it or not. I assumed that on a Bakker forum people would be cognizant of the perennial problem of unseen biases, but, as stated, ignorance is blind. This was the sole point I was making. Apparently it was in need of more explanation, to clarify that I do not feel offended or that this was for me not about political correctness or anything.

So yes, real life trumps (...) online communication.

As for Wilshire's statement and your, ahem, rather high praise, I beg to differ. It's not a false statement, per se. However, I feel the need to push against it, as it is a statement that does not display a great deal of self-reflection. To me it reads as containing too much self-justification, if I push it to an extreme, it can seem to negate personal responsibility or agency. As if you're saying, "it's your problem that your are feeling offended."

Yes, the elections are a prime example of the bizarre behavior you describe. Granted, there is a lot of anger going around, and people withdraw behind their own walls and feel the need to defend at the slightest (perceived) intrusion.

Still, what I am trying to get at, what I am missing in the statement (and this could be just me), is a recognition/awareness of the other. A willingness to listen, to listen to points of view that do not agree with your own, a willingness to have a sincere conversation. To make an effort to explain your intent, if the other doesn't seem to understand yours. The first reaction is too often, (I'm exaggerating)  "...so stupid that you cannot understand my intent..." - a very human reaction -, instead of thinking, "hmmm, how can I better explain my intent."  Which I feel is required, and would help contribute people being able to work through their problems together.



214
General Misc. / Re: What are you watching?
« on: November 02, 2016, 09:28:29 pm »
Its easy to be offended by anything. Harder to understand the intent.

That is the greatest statement of statements ever made. People rarely look at intent, just what is offensive to their own self's. I've found that the internet is the most offended space in the World. Its just so many different cultures interacting that someone is bound to be offended.

The question of intent was the whole point of my remark, as it was not about me being possibly offended. I did not make this up or read it somewhere on the internet. As Bakker points out, ignorance is blind. You need to take a closer look before you come up with ill-informed conclusions.

215
General Misc. / Re: What are you watching?
« on: November 02, 2016, 03:23:04 pm »
I'm not contending alien life, space faring, sentient, or otherwise.

I'm saying the show is ridiculous and the conclusions they draw are hilarious. :)

It's actually pretty belittling of humans, to insinuate that they simply couldn't possibly have done things like building the pyramids or whatever.  As if being smart or clever is a modern invention.  I'd actually bet that people were actually smarter and more clever then, on average, than now.  Probably by a lot actually.

Even more so, there is a racist underpinning (conscious or not) in white people asserting that non-white people could not have been responsible for building the pyramids etc.

216
General Earwa / Re: The Great Bakker Review Ordeal
« on: October 26, 2016, 12:11:24 pm »
And here is Speculiction:

http://speculiction.blogspot.nl/2016/10/review-of-great-ordeal-by-r-scott-bakker.html

It's positive, while not particularly insightful.

217
General Misc. / Re: Custom leather bound: The Darkness that Comes Before
« on: October 24, 2016, 05:35:52 pm »
Coooool!

220
Literature / Re: Quotes from Classics
« on: October 10, 2016, 05:14:52 pm »
Thanks, Hiro. Next time I talk to Cam I'll remind him to check this thread out.

Classic for me anyway, HP Lovecraft:

I never ask a man what his business is, for it never interests me. What I ask him about are his thoughts and dreams.

Nice!

221
General Earwa / Re: The Great Bakker Review Ordeal
« on: October 07, 2016, 02:04:53 pm »
I'll say. He took the time to read, digest and write about it though.

222
General Earwa / Re: Is there any interest for audiobooks?
« on: October 06, 2016, 09:02:47 pm »
By the way, someone uploaded PON and TSA audiobooks to Youtube...

223
The Great Ordeal / Re: [TGO SPOILERS] Head on a pole
« on: October 06, 2016, 02:22:15 pm »
Thanks for joining this rocky boat, MSJ  ;D

I think I mentioned it earlier: I believe the heads are representations of Saubon's and Proyas's (ciphrang?) aspects.
It makes sense:
They're his favorite servants... his Exalt-Generals. Proyas is even his favourite and most loyal slave.
Also, the use of the head came right after Saubon's death, and there's something in his death that just didn't feel right.
Add to that the description we get from the bad stuff Saubon did during the Unification Wars.
I think he had to die at Dagliash in order to be awakened on Malowebi's body.

Yeah, but what about good old Kosoter?

224
Literature / Re: Quotes from Classics
« on: October 05, 2016, 09:50:31 pm »
Since I'm (still) reading Moby Dick:

For in the mere act of penning my thoughts of this Leviathan, they weary me, and make me faint with their outreaching comprehensiveness of sweep, as if to include the whole circle of the sciences, and all the generations of whales, and men, and mastodons, past, present, and to come, with all the revolving panoramas of empire on earth, and throughout the whole universe, not excluding its suburbs. Such, and so magnifying, is the virtue of a large and liberal theme! We expand to its bulk. To produce a mighty book, you must choose a mighty theme. No great and enduring volume can ever be written on the flea, though many there be who have tried it.

225
The Great Ordeal / Re: [TGO SPOILERS] Head on a pole
« on: October 05, 2016, 09:30:41 pm »
Also, yes I have may of gotten ahead of myself. He probably wasn't a Ciphrang. He could have been. He could be been more closely to related to what CnaĆ¼ir is, on the way there.

See, that grabbed my interest, since you were so straightforward, I thought, 'what did I miss...?'

With the theories here of reflections and past-future versions, I'm waiting for someone to come up with the theory that Kosoter is one of the two demon heads that Kellhus keeps around. Well. Maybe?

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17