The Second Apocalypse

Earwa => General Earwa => Topic started by: Baztek on July 02, 2013, 07:15:23 am

Title: Lack of skin-spies in the glossary
Post by: Baztek on July 02, 2013, 07:15:23 am
So any ideas why skin-spies are mysteriously absent from the TTT glossary? I guess if the TTT glossary is supposed to be read as an historical document it makes sense, since skin-spies are a new creation of the Tekne, but I've never actually been told that by Bakker or anyone else on this board. So what gives?

This isn't really that big of a deal, I'm just trying to spark some conversation in this lovely forum of ours :(
Title: Re: Lack of skin-spies in the glossary
Post by: Callan S. on July 02, 2013, 11:03:56 am
Omg, I just got this sudden flash that the glossary is written from some god like perspective and they can't see skin spies...but sranc are mentioned in there, aren't they? So dang, that was such a loopy perspective to suddenly see it from, but it's probably not valid...
Title: Re: Lack of skin-spies in the glossary
Post by: Wilshire on July 02, 2013, 01:48:47 pm
Probably because skin-spy's where supposed to be a surprise and Bakker didn't want to give anything away to someone who happend to hat the glossary on their first read... Or maybe he forgot lol.
Title: Re: Lack of skin-spies in the glossary
Post by: Madness on July 02, 2013, 03:29:43 pm
So any ideas why skin-spies are mysteriously absent from the TTT glossary? I guess if the TTT glossary is supposed to be read as an historical document it makes sense, since skin-spies are a new creation of the Tekne, but I've never actually been told that by Bakker or anyone else on this board. So what gives?

This isn't really that big of a deal, I'm just trying to spark some conversation in this lovely forum of ours :(

+1 the bold. I figure that the Glossary Encyclopaedia Futurus will feature the Skin-Spies as they are more commonly known by TAE.

No frowns, Baztek... we've built it, the posters will come ;).