Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Benjamin Cain

Pages: [1] 2
1
Literature / Re: Hyperion by Dan Simmons
« on: February 11, 2014, 08:54:14 pm »
No, I think you're right. Any negative impact of the internet on my thinking hasn't really come out in my writing. I model my non-academic writing style on that of my favourite writers, including Lewis Mumford, Ligotti, Thomas Frank, Erik Davis, Nietzsche, and so forth. I don't much like Twitter or Facebook or the other social media, precisely because the writing quality is constrained by the media.

I'd compare this problem to the one I have with movies. I love watching movies, but the more you watch the harder it is for the film-makers to impress you, because there comes a point where you've seen it all before. So it's possible to see or to read too much of a good thing, I think. In that case, you need to look around for new material and that takes some work. Now, I haven't read nearly as much fiction as I've seen movies, so I think I'm just lazy in looking for books that will appeal to me. Those books must be out there somewhere.

2
Literature / Re: Hyperion by Dan Simmons
« on: February 06, 2014, 02:04:31 am »
Actually, I think there's something deeper going on, when I say I'm having trouble finding a novel I really enjoy. I think either I've read too much or more likely the internet has changed my reading habits and maybe even my attention span. Even more likely, I think my taste has become so narrow that I'm maybe the only one who can write what I want to see written. I'm sure this is based on my ignorance, though, since there must be books out there that cater to even the most specific tastes. But how to find them?

I think the problem is also that writers may have a harder time enjoying the process of reading, just as film directors may have a harder time watching movies, because such creators are too aware of what goes on behind the scenes, so they have a harder time falling under the spell of an artwork. Not that I'm an expert novelist--I've only written one novel and it's hardly a masterpiece (but I think it's pretty cool!). Still, I've written a lot of nonfiction now, whereas I did most of my fiction reading before I'd written much of anything outside of school. So there's this deeper issue here.

3
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: January 28, 2014, 03:31:10 pm »
Your comparison of the Big Game lie with the Christmas myth is quite interesting. It does indeed suggest that the myths help the nostalgic adults as much as the naive children.

(click to show/hide)

Thanks very much for that review on Amazon (assuming it's yours).

4
Literature / Re: Hyperion by Dan Simmons
« on: January 26, 2014, 09:10:42 pm »
Ah, sorry, I assumed you were looking for an English copy. Yeah, I don't know about Norwegian translations. Try bookfinder.com, since it seems pretty thorough. The bookfinder prices include shipping and handling, which is handy.

5
Literature / Re: Hyperion by Dan Simmons
« on: January 26, 2014, 08:39:37 pm »
Sure, it's available on Amazon. Go for a used copy for about $10 or better yet search the used bookstores on bookfinder.com. Amazon.ca and Biblio.com have it for only $6 and change, shipping included. The hardcover on Amazon.com is going for only $2.

I've bought lots of used books through Amazon and as long as you stick with stores that have lots of positive ratings, you should be fine.

6
Literature / Re: Hyperion by Dan Simmons
« on: January 26, 2014, 07:28:37 pm »
I enjoyed all four books in the Hyperion-Endymion series. That was the first of a number of SF series I read, so it has a special place for me. I read on into the Endymion books because I was so intrigued by the evil AI schemes and the anti-Catholic themes.

I've read a number of SF series and here's how I'd compare them.

After Simmons (his later ones Illium and Olympos aren't as good, but if you're a sucker for SF you might check them out; mind you, his Carrion Comfort is much better), I read Peter F. Hamilton's long Reality Dysfunction series. That series has great action, more scientific jargon, and a lot of world-building. Hamilton is better at describing science and technology than is Simmons--without going full science-textbook on you, like Greg Egan.

Next, I read David Zindell's Neverness series and that has another special place for me, despite its flaws. It's a very philosophical and spiritual take on science fiction. There are some wonderful ideas and descriptions in there and if you're into spirituality without the religion, or into Eastern philosophy, you might want to check out Zindell. I didn't get all the way through his fantasy series, because it was a little too close to the Neverness story, which is what Zindell says he intended.

I also read Gene Wolfe's 12 book Sun series. What a whopping complexity that series is, but all in all I'd say reading it was worth it. Jack Vance's Dying Earth books are great as well--and much funnier than Wolfe's Sun books.

Where does Simmons's series fit into this mosaic? Simmons brings in a literary perspective--not so much in his writing style but in his allusions to other authors. This can get a little pretentious, as far as I'm concerned, but what I like most about the Hyperion Cantos is its elaborate plot and the coolness of the characters' schemes and of Simmons's religious ideas. It's not great on action or on technoscientific descriptions, and Zindell's series is much deeper with respect to the philosophy and spirituality. Wolfe's series, by contrast, has the most elaborate plot and Wolfe's writing quality is probably the best. Zindell is great too, although his failing is that he badly overuses certain cheesy words and phrases, like "light of the eyes." Also, Zindell can get a little sentimental, but he makes up for it.

I started reading Dune and Foundation, but for some reason I didn't get far. In fact, I'm having a hard time now finding a novel I can enjoy. This is why I hesitate to reread those treasured series, in case I spot more problems with them than I did on first reading (although I doubt that would be possible with respect to Wolfe).

7
Literature / Re: The Book of the New Sun by Gene Wolfe
« on: January 26, 2014, 06:44:23 pm »
I've read the entire series. It's well worth it, but the hidden meanings in the story are unbelievably complex. Gene Wolfe simply doesn't like to come out and hold your hand and tell you the importance of what's just happened. He wants you to figure out some of the connections yourself. For that reason, readers have produced an enormous quantity of interpretive material. See, in particular, the thorough and searchable www.urth.net. This is the most detailed resource, but it's not well-organized. I got hold of the very helpful Lexicon Urthus book, but that was only after I finished the series. That book is great for vocabulary and it also has a summary of all the major events in the New Sun series. The author has recently come out with a similar book for the third part of the series (the Short Sun), which is good, because that might be the most mysterious part--in good and perhaps also in some frustrating ways. Urth of the New Sun is pretty tricky as well.

This series is well-known for making the extraordinary seem commonplace. The writing is indeed exceptional, but I think the series isn't as well-read as it deserves to be, because it's full of intricate puzzles. Reading the New Sun books made me want to write my fiction in the first person. Mind you, Wolfe is also well-known for using untrustworthy narrators to add yet another layer of mystery. Is Severian lying at some points? There's lots of discussion of that as well.

If you like this genre, I'd recommend Jack Vance's Tales of the Dying Earth. That's a more amusing series. Some of the stories in Songs of the Dying Earth are also great.

8
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: January 26, 2014, 06:20:47 pm »
The lie works for the adults, too, in that it spares them the discomfort of having to explain the truth to the boy. It keeps Douglas out of the way. But the Cackler and Howard Rhodes and maybe the old man go mad from understanding the meaning of the apocalypse all too well. So the other, sane characters have their own delusions.

(click to show/hide)

9
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: January 22, 2014, 09:04:08 pm »
Thanks very much for your kinds words. I'm glad you enjoyed the book. Douglas will indeed be a major character. He's growing up fast, though. Having a child along in that terribly stressful situation would indeed by annoying, to say the least. But the thing is, without any children around, I figure the sense of doom would be unbearable since you'd have palpable proof of our imminent extinction. (Cormac McCarthy made much of this in The Road.) So the grown-ups have to figure out a compromise; hence, the trick they play on Douglas.

I agree, frankly, that the writing quality and the philosophical perspective are my strong suits, but I tried hard to make the characters interesting and believable. When Douglas and Jenna faced hard times, it got very difficult for me to write those parts. Douglas is modeled on my nephew (except that my nephew is only 2, not 6), whom I've written about a little on my blog. For example, when Douglas tries to use the binoculars but covers up the back end with his hand, my nephew did that very thing and it was hilarious.

I do hope you'll put your book review up on the Amazon page.

10
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: January 22, 2014, 02:03:50 am »
Thanks for your comments, Madness, and thanks for putting them in spoiler mode. I'll do the same. You certainly don't have to twist my arm to get me to talk about my novel.

(click to show/hide)

If you have other questions or comments, please don't hesitate to raise them. What did you think of the boy, Douglas, by the way?

11
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: January 21, 2014, 12:29:31 am »
Thanks all for reading the book! If you do have a strong enough reaction to it, I hope you'll post your review on Amazon. I don't want to sway the reviews either way with my comments. But I think I achieved what I wanted with the content of my first novel--although that's a weaselly thing to say since the question might be whether my goals were best. Authors are known to be very ambitious with their first novels, but that's with respect to authors who have deals with big publishers, since then they figure they have to put everything they have into that first book in case they don't get another chance. With POD, there's no need for that. I plan to keep writing novels and I have a huge narrative arc in mind, but I don't see a need to put it all in one book.

I'm sure my novel isn't for everyone, but that too isn't saying much. Who would want to read a novel that's fit for everyone? There are those classic novels with universal themes, but I think the more distinguished the reader's ideas are, the less likely she'll find an author who makes no wrong moves in the reader's judgment. I'm having a devil of a time finding a novel I can actually enjoy, so I read mostly nonfiction.

12
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: January 08, 2014, 09:31:11 pm »
Ah well, sorry about that. Maybe if you like it, you can pass along a copy to a friend when you're done.

13
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: December 23, 2013, 10:16:08 pm »
No, I agree with you Callan, the Cackler's story is largely a sad one. He's in there for black comic relief, with the emphasis on "black." (Actually, I added him late in the writing process, after about the third draft, because I wanted more dialogue in the beginning). Your interpretation of the Cackler is quite interesting. Like I said, I haven't figured out his whole back story, but I'd love to have an excuse to rant more in a fictional setting.

I haven't read the book in a while, but as I recall, he was fed by Eric and Hernando. But the way I imagined his survival, he's like an old-school Cynic who blends in with the chaos because he thinks of himself as an animal. Of course, that wouldn't suffice to save him from the zombies, so there's got to be more to it. An animal would have much less pride than a person, though, so the Cackler could resort to ugly means of surviving, sort of like the Jews who hid in outhouses during the Holocaust.

It's a little awkward commenting on the book since you haven't read it all yet, but there's another, more major character later on who likewise thinks of himself as somewhat less than human.

14
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: December 21, 2013, 03:36:30 pm »
How about the content of his rant, though? Was it amusing? There's the possibility of a spin-off book that centers on him and follows his story. I like that crazy character. Maybe I wouldn't make all of his rants into such long paragraphs, but I wanted to separate his dialogue from the rest in the book.

15
Literature / Re: God Decays by Benjamin Cain
« on: December 18, 2013, 11:15:02 pm »
I have never been fond of zombies, but since I enjoy your blog very much, I will give this a go:)

I wonder how you'd pirate the book without buying it first. Do you mean you can break into Amazon and steal the eBook?

I understand about the blog, though, assuming you're serious. It's not for everyone.

Pages: [1] 2