Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Neuropath / Re: Countering the Argument with Thorsten
« Last post by TaoHorror on January 11, 2019, 03:18:19 am »
Think I posted these Tallis articles long ago, not sure though:

What Neuroscience Cannot Tell Us About Ourselves

How Can I Possibly Be Free? - Why the neuroscientific case against free will is wrong

You're an ace, Sci - haven't read it all yet, about to hit the hay, but wanted to say thank you.
23
Neuropath / Re: Countering the Argument with Thorsten
« Last post by sciborg2 on December 01, 2018, 08:53:36 pm »
I think if you want to counter the argument you have start with the underlying questions that precede the mind/body question(s).

I mean I think those [mind/body] questions play a role, but I feel that trying to play the game the way Libertarians & Compatibilists do - accept just about all assumptions of the Reductionist/Determinist then either look for miracles or play semantic games - leaves one destined to lose.

Questions about time, substance, causality - these likely have more promise than initial focus of the human level.
24
Semantica / Re: The thing I look forward to most about Semantica is...
« Last post by Madness on February 21, 2018, 02:44:31 pm »
Good points, I do think a break from TSA could potentially have net-positive results (I can't see it making the series worse-off, anyway) and I personally would take a longer gap between whatever the first book of TSA: The Next Generation is, though I have a feeling we may be somewhat in the minority there ;).

Lol.
25
Semantica / Re: The thing I look forward to most about Semantica is...
« Last post by Francis Buck on February 17, 2018, 09:03:27 pm »
Good points, I do think a break from TSA could potentially have net-positive results (I can't see it making the series worse-off, anyway) and I personally would take a longer gap between whatever the first book of TSA: The Next Generation is, though I have a feeling we may be somewhat in the minority there ;).
26
Semantica / Re: The thing I look forward to most about Semantica is...
« Last post by Wilshire on February 12, 2018, 02:25:24 pm »
I picture it as a one off like Neuropath. A PKD style fast paced big ideas novel, heavy on action and cyberpunk trashy.

+1 - Semantica, for sure. Or a duology or something.

But SF deserves a full-on Bakker/TSA epic.

I want this so bad but I'm afraid he's just going to keep writing TSA material.

Which is itself not a bad thing (I feel like a prequel series after TNG is almost inevitable) but...a legit Bakker epic SF would be so. fucking. good.

I think given the choice between a new Bakker scifi series, or an immediate continuation of TSA through the end of TNG, I'd pick the former. Given what appears to be his present focus, based on his TPB posts and such, I think he's in a better headspace for a new scifi, and a break from TSA might make for better books in the future.
27
Semantica / Re: The thing I look forward to most about Semantica is...
« Last post by Francis Buck on February 09, 2018, 09:19:52 pm »
I picture it as a one off like Neuropath. A PKD style fast paced big ideas novel, heavy on action and cyberpunk trashy.

+1 - Semantica, for sure. Or a duology or something.

But SF deserves a full-on Bakker/TSA epic.

I want this so bad but I'm afraid he's just going to keep writing TSA material.

Which is itself not a bad thing (I feel like a prequel series after TNG is almost inevitable) but...a legit Bakker epic SF would be so. fucking. good.
28
Neuropath / Re: Countering the Argument with Thorsten
« Last post by BeardFisher-King on January 06, 2018, 04:16:43 pm »
You wouldn't say, for example, "You can look at the painting as an accumulation of paint, or you can not." You would say, "You can view that painting as an mere accumulation of paint and you can view that painting as a landscape."
Viewing it as a landscape does not change the fact that it's an accumulation of paint, with all the implications of being an accumulation of paint.

Very true. That is exactly correct. As an accumulation of paint, for example, it will require care, restoration, a controlled environment. And, viewing it as an accumulation of paint does not change the fact that it is an aesthetic object, a portrait of a landscape, with its corresponding implications.
29
Neuropath / Re: Countering the Argument with Thorsten
« Last post by TLEILAXU on January 06, 2018, 04:07:00 pm »
You wouldn't say, for example, "You can look at the painting as an accumulation of paint, or you can not." You would say, "You can view that painting as an mere accumulation of paint and you can view that painting as a landscape."
Viewing it as a landscape does not change the fact that it's an accumulation of paint, with all the implications of being an accumulation of paint.
30
Neuropath / Re: Countering the Argument with Thorsten
« Last post by BeardFisher-King on January 06, 2018, 04:00:53 pm »
You wouldn't say, for example, "You can look at the painting as an accumulation of paint, or you can not." You would say, "You can view that painting as an mere accumulation of paint and you can view that painting as a landscape."
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10