The Second Apocalypse

Miscellaneous Chatter => Philosophy & Science => Topic started by: sciborg2 on February 11, 2020, 08:32:23 pm

Title: An Existential Crisis in Neuroscience
Post by: sciborg2 on February 11, 2020, 08:32:23 pm
An Existential Crisis in Neuroscience (http://nautil.us/issue/81/maps/an-existential-crisis-in-neuroscience?utm_source=pocket-newtab)

Quote
The question of how we might begin to grasp the entirety of the organ that generates our minds has been pressing me for a while. Like most neuroscientists, I’ve had to cultivate two clashing ideas: striving to understand the brain and knowing that’s likely an impossible task. I was curious how others tolerate this doublethink, so I sought out Jeff Lichtman, a leader in the field of connectomics and a professor of molecular and cellular biology at Harvard.

Lichtman’s lab happens to be down the hall from mine, so on a recent afternoon, I meandered over to his office to ask him about the nascent field of connectomics and whether he thinks we’ll ever have a holistic understanding of the brain. His answer—“No”—was not reassuring, but our conversation was a revelation, and shed light on the questions that had been haunting me. How do I make sense of gargantuan volumes of data? Where does science end and personal interpretation begin? Were humans even capable of weaving today’s reams of information into a holistic picture? I was now on a dark path, questioning the limits of human understanding, unsettled by a future filled with big data and small comprehension.
Title: Re: An Existential Crisis in Neuroscience
Post by: mostly.harmless on February 12, 2020, 02:11:59 am
Added to to-read list :)

Sent from my LYA-L09 using Tapatalk