Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - themerchant

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 64
76
Philosophy & Science / Re: The Best from "Quillette"
« on: November 07, 2018, 11:12:00 pm »

77
Bought my first gig tickets since my 20's.

21 st anniversary of Massive Attack's Mezzanine album so they are playing one night in Glasgow. Really looking forward to it.

The album in question, i think track 3 might be the famous one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frkOYc1eYWU&list=PLH1JGOJgZ2u3ql4SJbF1iUIt3mSGfDsad

78
Philosophy & Science / Re: How Quantum Mechanics Could Be Even Weirder
« on: October 29, 2018, 11:28:13 pm »
They can't test it yet, they're just doing a mathematical progression that implies that at certain limits the universe communicates in even crazier ways than is thought about now.

Probably doesn't explain it at all, but i tried lol.

79
Philosophy & Science / Re: Sam Harris on why Materialism is Nonsensical
« on: October 29, 2018, 11:26:06 pm »
https://scientiasalon.wordpress.com/2015/05/11/reflections-on-the-skeptic-and-atheist-movements/

I read the "exchange" between Harris and Chomsky.  I imagine this is the intellectual equivalent with what would happen if I were to show up at the Lakers practice facility and hop on the court, clearly challenging Lebron James to a pick up game of basketball, after having empiricism his "basketball sense" and "understanding the fundamental question of basketball."  After Lebron thoroughly embarrassed me, complete with okiedokes, dipsey-doodles, Harlem-Globetrotter-style bouncing the ball off my head, and enough fakes that I send more time on prone than on my feet, I decry, "that was hardly a charitable exchange!"

Be glad it was Lebron , rather than Larry Bird or MJ as they would have trash talked you down to size at the same time. I knew my 80's basketball knowledge would prove a boon at one time!

81
Philosophy & Science / Re: Sam Harris on why Materialism is Nonsensical
« on: October 22, 2018, 05:43:05 pm »
Quote
Consciousness may very well be the lawful product of unconscious information processing. But I don’t know what that sentence means—and I don’t think anyone else does either.

Removing 'information' and using 'physical interactions', I don't know why he'd say he doesn't understand it. Maybe he expects to suddenly understand every little part - but that's like looking at a print out of code for a program and if you don't understand all of it then you don't understand any of it. It's just giving up.

IIRC Sam is a Neuroscience PhD, as such I doubt he's telling people in his own field to just give up researching the brain. Rather he's asking how you can go from matter that lacks consciousness to something that has consciousness - his object[ion], AFAICTell, is that there's a Something from Nothing problem.

I think Nagel said something similar, how describing the arrangement of atoms* that bring about consciousness wouldn't give you the answer as to why that arrangement works.

*Or chemicals, or cells depending on how far down you think you can go before you hit some disunity in levels of reduction.

Sam Harris payed to do a phd (as opposed from coming up through undergraduate, masters then phd) he didn't do his own experiments, and then he wrote a book based on his phd work.
 
I'd be astounded if he could add anything to the field.

82
Literature / Re: Steven Erikson (The 3.5 million word journey?)
« on: September 27, 2018, 09:43:35 pm »
Yeah now i've been introduced to some really good books in the Sci-fi genre on here i;ll be picking it up as well.

83
General Misc. / Re: Board Games and Miniatures
« on: September 27, 2018, 07:17:33 pm »
I was actually just checking that you wanted me to actually go to someone's house and ask them about stealing all monies. It sure looked that way but i thought best check before i label you crazier then me. :D

Yes - I would like someone to knock on his door, when he answers, say something to the effect, "hey man, you don't know me, but could you let me know if/when you intend to deliver Darkness Sabotage?". It can be a respectful exchange. Warning, do not try to hurt him or his property once you've been identified - the suggestion to egg his house was a joke. This is a request to anyone living near his home and would enjoy performing this task, not asking anyone to put themselves out or do anything they would not want to do.

I got the Private message from you, we'll move this over to secured communication channel, once my fee has cleared.

84
General Misc. / Re: Board Games and Miniatures
« on: September 27, 2018, 03:01:40 pm »
I was actually just checking that you wanted me to actually go to someone's house and ask them about stealing all monies. It sure looked that way but i thought best check before i label you crazier then me. :D

85
General Q&A / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Tsinirû
« on: September 26, 2018, 08:54:25 am »
Yes she is a sorceror and it was the artisan that got them together and that's the first time he appears in history gifting the day lantern which in some way causes the coming together of the two mansions.


86
General Misc. / Re: [TV Spoilers] Game of Thrones (S7)
« on: September 26, 2018, 07:53:16 am »
Well, the whole Night King thing is mostly a joke, but one taken from the roots of a real sentiment.  That pretty much all the characters have gotten to the level of being somewhat annoying (on the show).  Honestly, the Night King is refreshing in his steadfastness and lack of nonsense and bullshit.  You know the Night King isn't going to make some outlandish and dumb choice, he is just going to kill you, because he is going to kill every one.

Sure, the "default" is to view the Starks as a force of "good" but that ends up a little problematic, as Anna Smith Spark explains it.  It's interesting, in the face of a lack of appealing options, seems I am not alone in defaulting to nihilism.

Just read this. Anyone read her novel The court of broken knives?

87
General Misc. / Re: Board Games and Miniatures
« on: September 22, 2018, 05:33:32 pm »
So you want me to go knock on his door and ask him what's happening with the start up, as someone posted his address online.  He'll fucking shoot me probably.

The guys name is Dez Oku, which seems made up by a lazy person to me.

88
The Unholy Consult / Re: "Kellhus is dead, but not done."
« on: September 15, 2018, 05:54:11 pm »
It stops all souls from going to the outside though.
It certainly would be one interpretation of that line. But the issue is, in the infamous Dream Celmomas believed himself to be carried to Gilgaol's Heaven, which is in contention with the proposed interpretation.



Although the dragon said to seswatha that the No-god ate his soul. or tasted it, something like that. Although that's from the dreams as well, so just as unreliable. Plus it seems that might not have been Gilgaol but Ajokli.

I'm not too wedded to any interpetation but for the purpose of testing theories it's good to air them and see who can spot inconsistencies or add other titbits to make it more robust.

89
The Unholy Consult / Re: "Kellhus is dead, but not done."
« on: September 15, 2018, 05:49:41 pm »
It stops all souls from going to the outside though.
It certainly would be one interpretation of that line. But the issue is, in the infamous Dream Celmomas believed himself to be carried to Gilgaol's Heaven, which is in contention with the proposed interpretation.

[EDIT] I really dislike that Dream since it contradicts many things that would otherwise be all but set in stone.

[EDIT] And also the one where the Heron-Spear misses.

Yeah we have some competing evidence and no idea how much weight to put on each.

90
The Unholy Consult / Re: "Kellhus is dead, but not done."
« on: September 15, 2018, 03:04:13 am »
It is to souls though, Mimara second baby was still born, the soul that encounters him goes no further.
It's a strange thing. Yes, the No-God does something with birth, though we don't know what. But just by being there it doesn't close the world. Sorcery is contingent on the Outside and still works, the Gods are able to act and were able in the First Apocalypse, I'm pretty sure Ciphrang can still be summoned, and also, as dragharrow succinctly put it above, if it was enough for the No-God to just exist to prevent souls from going to Hell (or, much less likely, Heaven), the whole Apocalypse and 144k thing would've been totally unnecessary.

Considering all of this, I don't think it is correct to say that the world is closed in any way.

It stops all souls from going to the outside though.

The No-god has a shelf-life, exposing the code allows the no-god to make permanent the effect.

What do you think "the soul that encounters him goes no further" means in your context?

Obviously this is all speculation as no one really knows. For the purpose of debate i'll assume my weighting is correct (probably isn;t)

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 64