Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rots

Pages: 1 [2]
16
The Unholy Consult / Re: How tall are the Horns?
« on: September 22, 2017, 06:57:44 pm »
I remember there was a glossary entry about this. The Isuphiryas gives the height of th eUpright Horn as one thousand tens, or ten thousand Nonman cubits. By Sohonc accounts, which rely on mathematics and the measurement of shadows, put the height at some nine thousand seven-hundred and twenty-four Umeritic cubits, or little less than half the height reported by the Nonmen.

A cubit is suppose to be roughly the length of one's finger to elbow. Which is about half a meter. So by the Sohonc, around 4862 meters, roughly 15951.44. Unless I'm absolutely garbage at math and conversion, which I am.

Yeah, i tihnk a cubit is ~1.5 feet in length. Thanks for the knowledge/math! It puts me in mind of Mt. Rainier and the overarching prominence of it when seen from over 100 miles away on a clear day in the PNW. Good stuff.

17
The Unholy Consult / How tall are the Horns?
« on: September 22, 2017, 05:26:13 pm »
Someone out there must be better at math than me - does anyone have a decent idea how tall these things are? iirc the canted horn is described as taking something like 30 heartbeats to fall. The word "leagues" gets tossed around in one description of the horn falling to the plain, i think, also.

The Ark almost certainly was built in space wherever it came from. That sort of mass would be heinously hard to launch out of any sort of earth like gravitational field.

Also, randomly, why did Aurax open the door from the Vigil into the Golden Room? Is it as simple as death = damnation and he would do anything to live longer even though he was 99.999999999% certain Kellhus would kill him the second the door opened?

Also, randomly, why did the dunsult make a seemingly legit effort to kill Kellhus when as far as we know they also needed him to be TNG (at least until the last 20+ hours when Kel came into their clutches)? They need TNG to close off the world and stave off damnation and they they are going around trying to kill their shot at Resumption. Doesnt really make sense. Unless its all performative. When you have two sets of Dunyain (and a god!) claiming that the ground is conditioned in their favor motive/subject/object gets confusing in the extreme.

the book continues to definitely sit better with me after my re-read but there are still some ridiculous Chekhov gun scenarios running around. Oh well..

18
The Unholy Consult / Re: Who actually liked TUC?
« on: September 17, 2017, 02:10:50 am »
I still find it baffling someone even takes titles in a very serious manner to the point of saying it sucked. A title is just a title. We already had an idea of what some of the story would be from the outline/blurb and prior comments. If someone thinks the title was subterfuge, I think they buy too much into titles in general.

Titles matter because words have meaning. The previous 6 titles have been very on point and appropriate, imo, in a way that this title and book were not. The title primes the reader and in this case there was a misfire. I find that disappointing. RSB had mentioned something about the g-string (or whatever) coming off in this book and that primes his audience to expect X when instead we got Y.

19
The Unholy Consult / Re: Who actually liked TUC?
« on: September 14, 2017, 07:42:43 pm »
So i have completed my re-read and i have thoughts.

1. The Cannibal Rape Holocaust is better upon a re-read. But its hard to tease out exactly why. I think i appreciate it more, full stop. I also think that i wasnt impatient to get to the part of the book where, you know, maybe the Unholy Consult gets the detailed treatment many of us assumed it would. Since that obviously didnt happen i was better able to just carefully read the CRH and appreciate it for what it is. Its still too large a portion of the book but since the book is what it is i know longer hate it and take it on its own terms

2. There are still a whole lot of Chekhov's Guns laying around. My initial criticisms of RSB stand in regards to Akka and Mimara going for a fucking 4 book walkabout and do a grand total of jack shit. That doesnt mean that i dont hold much love for both of them, i do, however, their integration into TUC was a whole lot of sound & fury signifying nothing.

3. The title should be changed to: The Horns of Golgotterath - sure, the boards had guessed about the Dunsult twist but obviously no one knew. What was in actual evidence was that the most devious and evil minds of inchies/non-man/man were still the Unholy Consult. I think the title vs. the actual substance of the book is a cheap 3 card monty type of subterfuge. At least we have The False Sun and ill consider that my go to for cool Unholy Consult pov and background. The ppl on this board and others around the 'net are by definition a very small subset of RSBs very small fan base - how many ppl have actually read and discussed TFS? probably not many in the grand scheme of things. This title sucked.

4. Has anyone figured out wtf RSB was referring to when he talked about everyone missing something important? Dear RSB, if everyone is missing it the fault is with you, not the reader. RSB is very glib when pushing back on the readers and while i am 100% fine with ambiguity (as previously stated i loved the ending of TTT for example, or the pulling of Serwe's heart, etc etc) but when everyone is fucking clueless than perhaps pull back a bit on your glibness and spell some shit out and please spare me the sanctimonious crap regarding how the people who dont get it are actually the ones who get it the most of all. That the sort of BS i expect out of upper mngt trying to pull a TED talk out of their ass while they are announcing layoffs.

5. Because i dont have TGO near me i have a quick question that i just cannot recall the answer to. At the end of TGO when future/current/always No-God Kel interrupts the Narindar creeping up on Kellhus, which god does that WLW belong to? Yatwer, Ajokli, Momas? I just cant recall. 

Anyways, upon review, i like TUC (HOG) better than before but i am still moderately unsatisfied. Meh.

20
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 18, 2017, 12:03:11 pm »
We joked about him having a kind of 'battered wife' syndrome regarding his relationship with Overlook. He seems to think they can do no wrong, and has never looked for a better offer (imo, for fear of rejection).

This is unfortunate. As i get older i see that all of us, regardless of intellect or education level, is susceptible to a legion
of doubts and irrationalities.

What would you have named it? Seemed fitting enough to me compared to the other titles.

The Horns of Golgotterath - Denotes that all the action is in the Ark but doesnt tease out the Consult in a way that
was never delivered upon, again, imho

[EDIT Madness: Fixed quote tags.]

21
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 17, 2017, 07:15:59 pm »
Thanks for the info and reflections from Zaudunyanicon. Im sure it would hvae been interesting to see things through my own eyes. Subject/object, and all that. Sometimes being a Bakker fan is a slog - he does not endear himself or make it easy and that is obviously perfectly fine as he can do what he wants. Im still, to use a term in this thread, nonplussed about TUC and i dont see that changing. If nothing else its simply a bad title and doesnt jive w/the material in the way that hte other 6 titles and books do, imho.

Also, shocked that hes shocked that the editing is so poor. Doesnt he get a production copy of the book before anyone? The editing was basically atrocious for TUC. Regardless, good job @Madness & Wilshire for setting this up. impressive work recruiting a recalcitrant Bakker to come out and press the flesh a little.

22
Quote
If Ishoiya last year is any indication, it'll be less discussing Bakker and the books and more bacchanal (though, we drew the line at cannabalism and orgiastic excesses ;)).

Ha! Knowing when and how to draw the line during a bacchanal is key. I salute your wisdom. :)

Also, i am far less convinced by RSBs answer to this question than you. Which is obviously fine, but i find his response not at all compelling. RAFO as he is fond of saying.. Basically, for me, my disappointment can be boiled down the fact that this was called The Unholy Consult and we got precious little Unholy Consult. That and epic slogs through agongorea = meh. TUC had been sold by RSB as being the final piece of this story as he envisioned it way back when. I was hoping for a bit more meat..and less agongorea filler when it came to the numerous story lines that were left utterly untouched.

Obviously i am happy that the next series seems to be officially official but ill go into it a bit wary for the first time w/his works. I feel like he overplayed his hand here a bit in terms of how TUC was framed/sold as the final piece to this story, and what it delivered.

23
Of course, that's also what an author that failed would say  :P

Ha, beat me to it. That is awful convenient to say..

Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the response.
That means your planning on coming to Zaudunyanicon right? I kid ;)

Not kidding, you should come to Zaudunyanicon, Rots!

I would but its in the great white north, yes? I hope you all have a great time bouncing nerdanels off of one another!

[EDIT Madness: Fixed quote tag.]

24
I'm curious, nothing in the past decade has been interesting enough to spend time chatting about? Curious, I think, how misery loves company. Welcome (back) though.

Once upon a time i was an inveterate and deeply involved member of a lot of various boards in the net. Then, i realized that i value in-person communication more than 1s and 0s. So, i have vampire'd my way through the thought and dint of others while keeping my distance so i do not get sucked into writing thousands of words and spending hours of my time on 1s and 0s. I run huge networks that give voice/video/data access to millions of ppl as my day job. Mostly, i try and stay away from the day to day of boards and internet stuff when not working. Id rather be hanging out w/my gf, walking my dog, lifting weights, whatever, anything but the internet.

So, thats why i am 99% a lurker.

25
So ive now had several days to let TUC sink in and i am still of the opinion that its a massive let down. So much space dedicated to agongorea, i still cant get over that. I feel like that is a story line that maybe 16 year old RSB might have thought was transgressive and heterodox and is really just a slog and boring. Its the first and only time in reading the 7 books that i have ever thought about just fast-forwarding through it to get to the next chapter.

So many seemingly important story lines that were teased out for thousands of pages and are not even mentioned at all or barely touched upon. Im basically fine w/the ambiguity of the end - weve seen that before in the RSB playbook. The dues ex machina of the dunsult has been bandied about here for years but i am fine with that. however, the fact that the most devious and cunning minds of man, inchie, and non-man came together in the Consult and then had literally millennia to game theory TSA and they just get run over by Dunyain faster than Usain Bolt can run a 100 is a bit much.

Heres a thought: maybe spend a few hundred pages less repetitively illustrating mans inhumanity to man and give us some of those pages back as chapters on the Ark like were done for Ishterebinth. Or literally anything else. This is the first of these 7 books i will not recommend to anyone and the first that i will not buy in physical form. Ive been a 99% lurker but i go back to ZTS and have been avidly a reader and a fan of this series from day one and this is still, after 5 days of reflection, a real disappointment for me.

26
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]What was the point
« on: July 28, 2017, 06:50:29 am »
Also, did i miss anything re: the Nail of Heaven or is that left untouched also?

27
I agree with Panorama almost completely. Well put. Im hoping my initial disappointment subsides but seriously, wtf, so much bs. Maybe Bakker is the trickster..

28
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]What was the point
« on: July 28, 2017, 03:44:36 am »
Just finished the book. Ive been in self imposed exile from the boards for weeks. I must say.. meh. For the record i am 100% fine with the world ending and Mog running rampant. However, ~40% of the book devoted to agongorea? Come the hell on. Yes, we get it. Men = sranc. that is obvious to any casual study of man and history. I dont think we needed hundreds of pages of that.

I feel shortchanged. The Ark, the golden Ark, the inchies, Shae, where were the massive dumps of info? Keep in mind i literally just finished the book and have not read the appendices yet. But yeah..40% to the obvious and well worn tracks of the inhumanity of man was way too much.

Also, the editing was bad. Bad enough to take me out of the story. There were a lot of verb tense mistakes, repetitive descriptors in back to back to back sentences, etc.

Im looking forward to reading the thoughts of those that see deeper than i..but overall color me underwhelmed.

29
News/Announcements / Re: Donations to Bakker
« on: May 03, 2013, 03:10:43 am »
I donated to the cause. God knows what i gave is a poor representation of what i have received from RSB these last 10+ years.

Pages: 1 [2]