The Second Apocalypse

Earwa => The Aspect-Emperor => The Unholy Consult => Topic started by: Anaxophus on July 23, 2017, 06:35:02 pm

Title: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Anaxophus on July 23, 2017, 06:35:02 pm
Somwehere in TAE, Soma 2.0 told Mimara she was carrying twins, right?

Somewhere in TUC, Mimara births a son.  Does she have a second child?  I recall something somewhere about "the second labour", I think as they were fleeing the encampment for the "safety" of Golgotterath.

Aside from Achamian Jr., does Mimara birth two children for sure, are we unsure, or are we certain there's just the one kid?
Title: Re: QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on July 23, 2017, 06:53:59 pm
Somwehere in TAE, Soma 2.0 told Mimara she was carrying twins, right?

Somewhere in TUC, Mimara births a son.  Does she have a second child?  I recall something somewhere about "the second labour", I think as they were fleeing the encampment for the "safety" of Golgotterath.

Aside from Achamian Jr., does Mimara birth two children for sure, are we unsure, or are we certain there's just the one kid?

The second twin is stillborn, though you might have missed it as it only comes up in one paragraph. Chapter 19, page 426 (paperback):

Quote
The babe wailed. The mother sobbed. The second birth would be mercifully quick.
Furtive in the celebratory uproar, Esmenet hurriedly cut the cord with Chipmunk, then bundled the blue slip in a swathe of cloth torn from a corpse. The old Wizard would never know what became of it, the dead twin.
Title: Re: QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Anaxophus on July 24, 2017, 12:25:11 am
I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!
Title: Re: QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Woden on July 24, 2017, 08:40:39 am
I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!

Me too. And the book is so dense, man, that I really need to read it again.
Title: Re: QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on July 24, 2017, 10:44:18 am
I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!

You're welcome, and don't worry, it's easy to miss things in a book such as TUC. :) I know there are probably many bits and pieces I missed too.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Wilshire on July 24, 2017, 11:14:58 am
I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!

You're welcome, and don't worry, it's easy to miss things in a book such as TUC. :) I know there are probably many bits and pieces I missed too.

I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!

Me too. And the book is so dense, man, that I really need to read it again.

Its what happens when you read this books in one, or a few, sittings, reading as fast as possible :P .
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Woden on July 24, 2017, 11:32:38 am
I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!

You're welcome, and don't worry, it's easy to miss things in a book such as TUC. :) I know there are probably many bits and pieces I missed too.

I've been missing little parts like that a lot lately  :-[.  Thanks!!

Me too. And the book is so dense, man, that I really need to read it again.

Its what happens when you read this books in one, or a few, sittings, reading as fast as possible :P .

It was the "meat", the meat (of the book) drove us mad. The more you eat the more you hunger.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Hogman on August 14, 2017, 10:39:09 am
I think the child was stillborn because the No God was resurrected in between the two births.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: SmilerLoki on August 14, 2017, 10:58:18 am
I think the child was stillborn because the No God was resurrected in between the two births.
It might also be because the Judging Eye requires a stillbirth.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Duskweaver on August 14, 2017, 12:41:00 pm
Yes. Both of those things. It is our first clue that the No-God is back, as well as being something we knew was going to happen since TJE.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: SmilerLoki on August 14, 2017, 01:28:56 pm
Yes. Both of those things. It is our first clue that the No-God is back, as well as being something we knew was going to happen since TJE.
I really don't think anything can be said with certainty.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Quinthane on August 14, 2017, 02:10:11 pm
But Soma didn't tell her she was carrying twins. The Survivor did. Right?
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on August 14, 2017, 02:16:55 pm
But Soma didn't tell her she was carrying twins. The Survivor did. Right?

That's right. Soma only told her she was pregnant in TWLW. Koringhus was the one who told her she was having twins in TGO.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Monkhound on August 14, 2017, 02:24:05 pm
Soma sensed the stench of 3 in Mimara's urine, IIRC. It's in TWLW somewhere.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on August 14, 2017, 02:31:34 pm
Soma sensed the stench of 3 in Mimara's urine, IIRC. It's in TWLW somewhere.

I don't remember any mention of a twin pregnancy in TWLW, but it's quite possible I missed it. I'll have to look it up when I can.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Woden on August 14, 2017, 02:43:12 pm
Soma sensed the stench of 3 in Mimara's urine, IIRC. It's in TWLW somewhere.

I remember something like that.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Yellow on August 14, 2017, 03:33:57 pm
I think the child was stillborn because the No God was resurrected in between the two births.

The NG didn't come about until after both births. The "dread" or  whatever it's called wasn't present until *after* the carapace descends from the Horn and after Mimara looks on it with the Eye, so it didn't cause the still birth.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Monkhound on August 14, 2017, 04:57:44 pm
I think the child was stillborn because the No God was resurrected in between the two births.

The NG didn't come about until after both births. The "dread" or  whatever it's called wasn't present until *after* the carapace descends from the Horn and after Mimara looks on it with the Eye, so it didn't cause the still birth.

I was tempted to go both ways here, and I was leaning towards the NG being the cause while reading, as it would serve the narrative well. But I have to agree with Yellow.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Hogman on August 14, 2017, 07:57:42 pm
I think the child was stillborn because the No God was resurrected in between the two births.

The NG didn't come about until after both births. The "dread" or  whatever it's called wasn't present until *after* the carapace descends from the Horn and after Mimara looks on it with the Eye, so it didn't cause the still birth.

Not necessarily. I assume the horde begins to flee when the No God is reborn. The second birth happens after that (page 426). There could have been a delay before the boding began. Or maybe the horde flees because they sense Ajokli. Who knows?
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Cynical Cat on August 14, 2017, 10:00:02 pm
The Boding occurs after Mimara gives birth.  She's giving birth prematurely to twins in far from ideal conditions.  That one of them would be stillborn is far from unlikely.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: The Sharmat on August 15, 2017, 10:20:45 am
Another guy with a screwed up twin. Hope it doesn't talk to him like the last two.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on August 15, 2017, 01:42:41 pm
Another guy with a screwed up twin. Hope it doesn't talk to him like the last two.

The odds aren't great for Akka Jr. not to be affected by his dead twin considering the precedent of Celmomas and later Kelmomas, poor kid. Though, seeing as TNG will begin a few weeks after the end of TUC, it seems unlikely we'll see if the whole "twin-souled" thing comes into play.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Madness on August 15, 2017, 04:43:44 pm
Considering Bakker's surprise regarding the parallel to Alia on the AMA (https://www.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/6r3hba/unholy_consultation_r_scott_bakker_bares_the_soul/dl2tet9/), I'm going to assume that Akka Jr. isn't pre-born due to the Qirri with the ancestral memories of Nil'giccas and Cu'jara Cinmoi :(...
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on August 15, 2017, 04:51:35 pm
Considering Bakker's surprise regarding the parallel to Alia on the AMA (https://www.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/6r3hba/unholy_consultation_r_scott_bakker_bares_the_soul/dl2tet9/), I'm going to assume that Akka Jr. isn't pre-born due to the Qirri with the ancestral memories of Nil'giccas and Cu'jara Cinmoi :(...

That's honestly a bit disappointing, I liked how the Dune parallels worked so well with him (qirri could have also caused Mimara's pregnancy to last only 6 months much like Chani's pregnancy in Dune Messiah was "sped up" via spice).
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Madness on August 16, 2017, 04:53:52 pm
Considering Bakker's surprise regarding the parallel to Alia on the AMA (https://www.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/6r3hba/unholy_consultation_r_scott_bakker_bares_the_soul/dl2tet9/), I'm going to assume that Akka Jr. isn't pre-born due to the Qirri with the ancestral memories of Nil'giccas and Cu'jara Cinmoi :(...

That's honestly a bit disappointing, I liked how the Dune parallels worked so well with him (qirri could have also caused Mimara's pregnancy to last only 6 months much like Chani's pregnancy in Dune Messiah was "sped up" via spice).

Indeed. Been wishing for the Qirri pre-born since WLW.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: ThoughtsOfThelli on August 16, 2017, 05:21:36 pm
Considering Bakker's surprise regarding the parallel to Alia on the AMA (https://www.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/6r3hba/unholy_consultation_r_scott_bakker_bares_the_soul/dl2tet9/), I'm going to assume that Akka Jr. isn't pre-born due to the Qirri with the ancestral memories of Nil'giccas and Cu'jara Cinmoi :(...

That's honestly a bit disappointing, I liked how the Dune parallels worked so well with him (qirri could have also caused Mimara's pregnancy to last only 6 months much like Chani's pregnancy in Dune Messiah was "sped up" via spice).

Indeed. Been wishing for the Qirri pre-born since WLW.

Akka Jr. even had a twin and all, it would fit him so well to have him become the Leto II of TSA.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: Madness on August 16, 2017, 05:38:17 pm
I'd even have enjoyed it going the Abomination Alia route.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: H on August 21, 2017, 12:28:02 pm
I'll just toss this random sort of thought out in here, because it's not well-formed, or well-researched enough for a thread.

While "wrestling" with my two year old during church, something of the sermon got me thinking (recently was the Assumption of Mary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption_of_Mary)): Mary (not Jesus) is how God enters the world.

What does this mean in the context of tSA though?  It's Esmenet who is mostly the "Mary" analogue in the series, because we know that Mimara is really the prophet, really the "voice" of god.  Not only that, but Esmenet is also that which the No-God enters the world.  And if Kellhus is to be believed, the Darkness that afflicts him.

So what?  But this means that most of the actual Second Apocalypse is predicated on Esmenet.  She is the crux of everything that happens.  She is literally the most important person on Eärwa, really.  I don't think we'll ever know why though.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: profgrape on August 21, 2017, 02:07:47 pm
  Not only that, but Esmenet is also that which the No-God enters the world.  And if Kellhus is to be believed, the Darkness that afflicts him.

Very interesting thought, H!  That Esmenet is Kellhus' "darkness" because he loves her doesn't quite fit for me.  So tying it to the general darkness that surrounds the NG makes a lot of sense.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: TaoHorror on August 23, 2017, 03:59:13 pm
Before reading the forums, I took the quickened birth as a result of the qirri and the stillborn yielding the Eye - but the Eye still opens for Mimara after the stillborn birth, so the No-God could've killed it since it hasn't birthed yet. Not sure of the chronology if that makes sense, but I think the No-God "shows" once the trans mutilations of Kel complete.
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: MSJ on August 23, 2017, 05:35:46 pm
I have taking it that Mimara has and always will have the JE. As to the stillborn, the resurrection of The NG is what I took to cause the death of the baby. I'll have to go back and read that scene again, but was the Eye actually open when Mimara looked upon the hologram and the Carapace?
Title: Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
Post by: SmilerLoki on August 23, 2017, 05:41:36 pm
I have taking it that Mimara has and always will have the JE. As to the stillborn, the resurrection of The NG is what I took to cause the death of the baby. I'll have to go back and read that scene again, but was the Eye actually open when Mimara looked upon the hologram and the Carapace?
It was.
Quote from: R. Scott Bakker, "The Unholy Consult", Chapter 19, "Resumption"
It does not matter.
The Judging Eye is open.

***

The Holy Aspect-Emperor speaks from a black dais ...
Anasûrimbor Mimara advances through the kneelers, stumbling onto the backs of some, hauling herself onward without acknowledgement, let alone apology.