The Second Apocalypse

Earwa => The Aspect-Emperor => The Great Ordeal => Topic started by: locke on October 20, 2015, 08:53:53 pm

Title: New Cover Discussion
Post by: locke on October 20, 2015, 08:53:53 pm
Not that the forum noticed but the cover art is up on amazon as well. Release date thread is locked.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: mrganondorf on October 22, 2015, 12:02:01 pm
Not that the forum noticed but the cover art is up on amazon as well. Release date thread is locked.

thanks for the info, i just cannot get excited about that look :(
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: H on October 22, 2015, 12:08:15 pm
Not that the forum noticed but the cover art is up on amazon as well. Release date thread is locked.

thanks for the info, i just cannot get excited about that look :(

Yeah, my TJE and WLW sit on my shelf with no dust jackets.  I lost/threw them away.  While I didn't do it purposely, it's really wasn't an accident either...
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Wilshire on October 22, 2015, 03:35:32 pm
Worst English version cover so far imo
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Aural on October 23, 2015, 08:25:24 pm
Worst English version cover so far imo

Yeah... no (http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/princeofnothing/images/5/52/Tdtcb.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150414105332).
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Madness on October 23, 2015, 08:56:36 pm
Lol - yeah. There's a whole unfortunate series of face covers...
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Somnambulist on October 23, 2015, 09:43:59 pm
Before I weigh in on covers, can anyone elaborate on exactly why they feel the 'face' covers are so crap?
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Madness on October 23, 2015, 09:50:05 pm
Well, I know very little about the study of art and only a little bit more about why the brain seems to find certain principles in art more aesthetically attractive than other particular visual cues...

But I "feel" like the Rankine series (TWP (http://www.davidrankineart.com/WP.jpg), for instance) is on the other spectrum of quality covers than the face series.

EDIT: Also, let it be officially declared by myself that I'd love to see Somnambulist do the next cover and/or illustrated editions of PON, TGO, TUC, whatever.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Aural on October 23, 2015, 09:58:04 pm
Speaking of faces, someone mentioned on the other board that this face is a blind man with a serpent. Wonder what people here think about that.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Somnambulist on October 23, 2015, 10:02:28 pm
Lol, come on, buddy!  I appreciate the 'United Nations' answer, cuz Kellhus knows I've given a shit-ton of them in my own life. :)

Are the Rankine covers the originals from Canada?  Like, the ones you're used to?  Taking nothing away from them at all, because they're elaborately beautiful (imo), but I wonder if it's a mental connection to the text.  The copy of TDTCB I found/bought all those years ago was the face cover.  TBH, it's one of the reasons I bought the book.  It was dark, mysterious, serious looking, and along with the title, just blew away every other book in the 'fantasy' genre that was out at the time (that I remember, anyway).  So, I wonder if that's my mental connection.  Like, that's the way it's supposed to look or something, so I'm partial to those covers now.

I just found it interesting how a few of you seem to despise those face covers.  Maybe if the one I'd bought had been a Rankine version, I'd feel the same way.  Just thought it was curious.

Now you can blast me for liking the face ones.  Ooh, I can feel the damnation welling up...
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Madness on October 24, 2015, 12:01:21 am
Lol - yeah, the Rankine series are the original PON covers in Canada. Though, I've also seen a fair number of these (TWP) (http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSPFIJekGiOkVrufE7nLB5jjrMv0uqt4Mn_lYmBrh7B-6bIVfjx) circulating, which I find satisfying on the spectrum somewhere between the Rankine pieces and the face.

Aside factoid, the face is apparently some editor or agent's nephew or something, as I recall - I'll try and find the comment from Bakker at some point (I want to say it's on TPB somewhere).

Absolutely, first impressions bias us. So does knowledge. Wilshire knows more of the exactitudes than anyone but the Rankine cover script is actually something Rankine/Bakker devised - as far as I recall, it's a transcribed quote from the books that Bakker chose and a set of King Crimson lyrics that Rankine chose. Knowing that has undoubtedly coloured my arbitrary perception/projection of "quality."

Someone else asked a similar question on Westeros and no one answered them, though I did a little research in an attempt. This (http://www.creativindie.com/8-cover-design-secrets-publishers-use-to-manipulate-readers-into-buying-books/) was the most enlightening piece of opinion I could find and, to be honest, in giving it thought here, the face covers aren't necessarily "breaking" any of those "rules."

That's just my stream of consciousness thoughts on the subject.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Somnambulist on October 24, 2015, 01:44:52 am
Thanks for that link about cover design.  Bookmarked.  Takes me back to all that design theory stuff in school.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: locke on October 24, 2015, 05:14:29 am
Lol - yeah, the Rankine series are the original PON covers in Canada. Though, I've also seen a fair number of these (TWP) (http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSPFIJekGiOkVrufE7nLB5jjrMv0uqt4Mn_lYmBrh7B-6bIVfjx) circulating, which I find satisfying on the spectrum somewhere between the Rankine pieces and the face.

Aside factoid, the face is apparently some editor or agent's nephew or something, as I recall - I'll try and find the comment from Bakker at some point (I want to say it's on TPB somewhere).

Absolutely, first impressions bias us. So does knowledge. Wilshire knows more of the exactitudes than anyone but the Rankine cover script is actually something Rankine/Bakker devised - as far as I recall, it's a transcribed quote from the books that Bakker chose and a set of King Crimson lyrics that Rankine chose. Knowing that has undoubtedly coloured my arbitrary perception/projection of "quality."

Someone else asked a similar question on Westeros and no one answered them, though I did a little research in an attempt. This (http://www.creativindie.com/8-cover-design-secrets-publishers-use-to-manipulate-readers-into-buying-books/) was the most enlightening piece of opinion I could find and, to be honest, in giving it thought here, the face covers aren't necessarily "breaking" any of those "rules."

That's just my stream of consciousness thoughts on the subject.
I like both the face and rankine covers but I strongly dislike the cover linked here. The face covers are probably better at selling the book than either of the others.

Does the face cover on the first series indicate it's in a third printing run?
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Wilshire on October 24, 2015, 01:47:41 pm
I just know that the faces have nothing to do with the series. I asked bakker about them, he doesn't even know who the guy is or why they picked it.

On the other hand, the rankine covers bakker worked with rankine on the design and its a beautiful artistic rendition of some psedu-earwe text. So not only is it unique and beautiful, it's significant to the text. The face... is just some random guys face.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: themerchant on October 25, 2015, 02:20:52 am
I have the face covers. The only one i did not have was the WLW one which was the weird looking dude on the circumfix, I ordered that directly from Canada as it was the quickest way to read the book. All my face books are still intact while the Canadian one broke into bits ages ago, even though it is significantly younger and less thumbed.



Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: H on October 25, 2015, 01:17:21 pm
I find the face covers bad because, to me, they look utterly like "generic fantasy book" covers.

Really, if you changed the title on it, you could use that cover for probably 90% of fantasy books.  The Rankine cover at least presents something of interest, in the sense that it is a mysterious language.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Wilshire on October 25, 2015, 03:12:39 pm
The original tdtcb and twp that I got were the old mosaic style, in the series that madness showed earlier. So it's not just nostalgia I think, in further defence of my opinion ;)
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Francis Buck on November 20, 2015, 02:28:37 am
I'm probably an outlier here but I like the "mosaic" ones the most (these http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSPFIJekGiOkVrufE7nLB5jjrMv0uqt4Mn_lYmBrh7B-6bIVfjx (http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSPFIJekGiOkVrufE7nLB5jjrMv0uqt4Mn_lYmBrh7B-6bIVfjx)).

The face ones are, as others have said, very boring and generic. And while I like the Rankine ones in concept, and that they use some sort of material from the series itself, they still don't really do it for me.

As dumb as it sounds, I think the "mosaic" covers actually made me take the books more seriously from the onset (not that I wouldn't have after reading the first couple pages). They look...classy? I don't know, that's not really it. They don't scream fantasy -- or even really hint at it -- which I kind of like for whatever random reason. I generally prefer simplistic designs that evoke a feeling, rather than overt imagery, when it comes to most book covers.

Terrible picture here, but just as an example of what I mean, I love the front-end design on A Dance with Dragons, way more than the dust-jacket itself (which to me is basically just as generic as the TSA face covers, but slightly less offensive with the lack of face).

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oF0rMO4u-hk/hqdefault.jpg)

(it irritates the living hell out of me that the design isn't centered vertically though)
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: H on November 20, 2015, 11:43:54 am
Well, I don't mind the "mosaic" ones really, not great, but certainly not bad.

The Rankine covers will always be the "true" covers to me, probably mostly for the fact that it was that cover of tDtCB that caught my eye and got me interested.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Madness on November 20, 2015, 11:51:13 am
The Rankine covers will always be the "true" covers to me, probably mostly for the fact that it was that cover of tDtCB that caught my eye and got me interested.

This.

However, I thought you won this topic when you pointed out that TGO has a recycled cover.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: H on November 20, 2015, 02:13:03 pm
The Rankine covers will always be the "true" covers to me, probably mostly for the fact that it was that cover of tDtCB that caught my eye and got me interested.

This.

However, I thought you won this topic when you pointed out that TGO has a recycled cover.

I think that was actually MG.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: profgrape on November 21, 2015, 12:38:59 am
I didn't even realize until Pat pointed it out with his post about TGO...

http://fantasyhotlist.blogspot.com/2015/11/us-cover-art-for-r-scott-bakkers-great.html
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Madness on November 21, 2015, 01:16:31 am
I think I've confused H for profgrape twice now.

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oF0rMO4u-hk/hqdefault.jpg)

(it irritates the living hell out of me that the design isn't centered vertically though)

Lol - I didn't see this earlier.

I can't believe this is hidden under a generic face-jacket... like some beautiful book skin-spy.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: Wilshire on November 21, 2015, 08:42:42 pm
Wow. Recycled face cover. That's just awesome. Another great reason to love overlook.
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: profgrape on November 21, 2015, 08:46:25 pm
Us Southerners all look alike, eh?
Title: Re: New Cover Discussion
Post by: natanaj on December 03, 2015, 11:42:41 pm
not a big fan of the face covers. My favorite were the hardback covers from the PON trilogy.