One expert/scientist says this and another something else, so who do you believe?
Indeed. There's architects both ways, I'd guess. Someone in the Conspiracy Squad thought destroying a bunch of papers in WTC 7 was a sellable idea.
Welcome to the world of synchronicity. It is in this world, at whatever threshold of coincidence, a special narrative emerges.
And to me, my threshold of coincidence is somewhere around the "running the same" war-games; I don't know what the frequency of "ok, girls and boys, today we're pretending terrorists are capturing planes to use as bombs" but the statistical chances minimize with every correspondence.
People probably have a pretty low threshold for meaningful coincidences. As evident by the sheer variation of conspiracy theories, I've been exposed to in my life.
Maybe the system itself creates a lot of paranoia, leaving in its wake paranoid citizens?
Here is a passage from this fantastic Illuminatus book:)
Lol, even the lowest of hierarchies have wisdom to offer, Royce. They need not even realize what they're saying.
Personally, my issue is their lack of any attempt at a coordinated, community action. They do give symposiums, etc, but they aren't putting themselves out there, they're surrounding themselves with people who are mostly favourable then neutral towards their system of thought.
Yes, the system itself inherently creates a lot of paranoids but...
Can you solely describe one group of <insert conspiracy organization> that can possible mediate
all other circumstances of why we've allowed a sort of tribal regression to set into the Western Empire? I mean, I'm sure such organizations would want to actively instill that kind of plebletariot but we could all go a long way to stop being paranoid and alone by adopting an actual sense of community, rather than the illusion of one.