Seemed relevant to the topic. I think most people suffer from confirmation bias, and it's a good idea to explore why men are so resistant to feminism.
Depends if one side forgets it's also vulnerable to confirmation bias as it focuses entirely on the other side?
I'll also say I find the EkyannusIII references to accepting biology to be dubious, as there's no reference to any peer reviewed journals to clarify/support his points.
I think he's trying to say men are more physically powerful, so women can't fight them off and feminism is hiding that gender strength disparity/that women can't fight them off and so leaving them vulnerable. I don't really agree a bit of upper body strength is a defining issue myself (as I partly noted with my comments about a bread knife between male ribs). Nor do I agree that some "men defending women or women can only move around in groups of two or three" culture is a solution. Though, rather than upper body strength, it might do well to look into male psychosis. You can't treat upper body strength (if it somehow mattered), but you can (self) treat psychosis.
I am glad to see Meyna here, as I believe that makes at least one actual female who is interested in discussing such issues around these parts. I know Three Pound Brain largely reads as biased figures all agreeing with each other, so it would be good to have some female perspectives here.
I'm stuck in two camps, wanting a less skewed demographic, but at the same time people are just people here.
eta: If you're interested I'd link this thread to Westeros as I'm curious to see the reactions.
Depends on whether you can describe the argument I'm putting forward (you don't have to agree with it, just be able to describe the idea of it correctly). Otherwise I'd be giving permission to link a missinterpretation of my argument, which would be all sorts of train wreck.