Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Yellow

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 11
61
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 19, 2017, 06:24:49 am »
Bakker answered this in the AMA and the Q&A thread. Nau-Cayuti and Kelmomas have the same brain structure as the original insertant (who was lost during Arkfall).

I would modify this slightly in that he said an original insertant, not the original insertant, so I don't think there was only one of them.

EDIT - fixed the tag.

62
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 19, 2017, 06:17:01 am »
EDIT - this first bit is in reply to Curethan, but the bit about chorae is in reply to both.

I guess I don't understand your first point / question. I don't believe it matters what the Psukhe is used to *do*, whether that's to destroy things, or walk in the sky, or anything else. If it is done with perfect recollection, it is indistinguishable from as if the God has done it. But it's still sorcery, right? It's just that one method is imperfect. This is basically what Kellhus tells Akka, anyway.

The chorae question is interesting and I'm not sure. But I would say that I think chorae act to destroy links to the Outside, in which case they would definitely kill Psukhe - wielders. I don't believe they act to destroy things which are distinguishable from the God, specifically. The Aporos is the sorcery of contradictions, but I always took that to be referring to (in effect) the use of sorcery to destroy the act of sorcery. Not that chorae specifically destroy contradictions.

Would chorae kill gods? I note that Ajokli was wary of them when he manifested in the Golden room. He forced the skin spies' hands to the ground so they could not use them against him. Was he just trying to protect his host (i.e. Kellhus), or was he also protecting himself? He was as close to all powerful in that Topos as he could possibly be, but he still feared chorae. Would a fully-manifested Ajokli be susceptible to chorae? And if he had created his own Hell in which he is basically all-powerful, why would he allow himself - even through a host body - to be susceptible to anything, unless he was unable to do anything about it? I don't believe we have any evidence either way to answer this - correct me if I'm wrong. What would happen if a chorae found its way (somehow, don't ask me how) into the Outside?

The only thing against this idea that I can think of is that Mimara is not destroyed by chorae. But is she a god? I don't believe so. She's definitely holy, though, sure (EDIT - actually, I don't believe that's true. She's saved, but really it's the Eye that's holy). The JE has a strange interaction with chorae, which I can't remember the details of - it somehow was able to see the God through the chorae, as though the chorae was a direct link to the God. I need to go back and re-read that section in Cil-Aujas to see whether this completely negates my points above.

I guess I just have to admit I have no idea how chorae work :P

63
The Unholy Consult / Re: Cu'jara/Ku'jara?
« on: August 18, 2017, 04:32:12 pm »
Because the EG is intended to be an in-universe artefact, the work of Earwan scholars.

well i guess the 2nd apocalypse will be averted because for the contents of the EG to have been written, it would have been after the 2nd apocalypse in order for the writers to know about resumption and other stuff

To paraphrase Kick Ass... Didn't you ever see American Beauty?

64
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 18, 2017, 04:30:55 pm »
As an aside, perhaps it is simply that sorcery leaves a Mark only when the sorcerer uses language. I believe Gnostic and Anagogic schools both use dead languages for the Uterals - that's a pretty strong link to a lot of  dead and dawned souls really.

My take was that the Mark is a result of imperfection. When recalling the God through meaning and language, the wielder's recollection is imperfect and therefore can be distinguished from the work of the God.

The Psukhe, in the other hand, is the result of the wielder *feeling* as the God, and these emotions are the thing itself, not representations of the thing. Therefore not imperfect. Therefore no Mark.

65
General Earwa / Re: Next Year's Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 16, 2017, 05:28:09 am »
Boooooo.

66
General Earwa / Re: Next Year's Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 15, 2017, 09:38:31 pm »
Manchester is the new Egypt, so they say!

67
General Earwa / Re: "Next Year's" Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 15, 2017, 04:41:09 pm »
Location: Europe...! ;)

UK! Specifically, Manchester  :P The Chanv flows like water...

68
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 15, 2017, 04:39:55 pm »
Kellhus, Shauriatis, Halos, Fanimry. All fucking amazing.

If you guys ever want to do this in the UK, I'm in!

69
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 14, 2017, 03:50:03 pm »
We just need cold fusion for the full house  ;)

70
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]QUESTION: Mimara's Child/Children
« on: August 14, 2017, 03:33:57 pm »
I think the child was stillborn because the No God was resurrected in between the two births.

The NG didn't come about until after both births. The "dread" or  whatever it's called wasn't present until *after* the carapace descends from the Horn and after Mimara looks on it with the Eye, so it didn't cause the still birth.

71
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]What was the point
« on: August 10, 2017, 07:22:59 pm »
The waxing and waning makes it sound like a nova or something. Maybe the Inchoroi did something to the star? That's assuming they're literally going from one star system to the next, wiping out life in one giant daisy chain. I doubt we'll ever really know.

72
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]The Incû-Holoinas
« on: August 10, 2017, 03:15:45 pm »
I keep misreading "Incu - Holoinas" as "Incu-Hollandaise". Coincidence? I THINK NOT.

73
The Unholy Consult / Re: Merchandising the Second Apocalypse
« on: August 09, 2017, 03:08:55 pm »

Btw, if you are interested, you should check out Malazan, one of the books fairly drips with the stuff (Reaper's Gale I believe).

Now *there's* a series which disappeared up its own arse. Read all the Erikson main sequence ones, which were excellent up to book 5, then increasingly self - indulgent until the end.  The Esslemont ones were just dreadful.

74
The Unholy Consult / Re: Merchandising the Second Apocalypse
« on: August 09, 2017, 08:59:33 am »

Anb black seed everywhere.

... Eesh.

75
The Unholy Consult / Re: Zaudunyanicon Q&A
« on: August 08, 2017, 12:50:24 pm »
As a founding remember of the Consult, at what point did Mekeritrig "ride against the No-God"?

+1

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 11