Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sausuna

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
106
The Unholy Consult / Re: Big question about the consult's intentions.
« on: August 29, 2017, 07:18:32 pm »
The Horde fleeing could mean that. Or they could have been routed given the massive slaughter (over a million corpses there, mostly Scranc, as noted) with the Quya pushing them out of the Canal.

Sranc routed? Really?
EDIT And in silence?
Sranc can be routed, they were driven across the large of the Istyuli plains before being forced to fight at Dagliash. As far as the silence, relating to the Canal just being cleared and those outside running. It wasn't literally silent so much as the contract from before. At least that's how it read to me.

I assume SmilerLoki is referencing the fact that The Boding is not described until after the births. Which might be fair, given that apparently everyone around the world could feel it. It seems quite a significant horror. Not that I think that is conclusive proof otherwise either.

107
The Unholy Consult / Re: Big question about the consult's intentions.
« on: August 29, 2017, 06:52:27 pm »
If you do have the book, there is nothing to say. I was speaking by memory.
A friend of mine borrowed it (and there is another waiting in line), so it will be a time until I can check it again.
EDIT: Anyway, when the horde flees, it means that Resumption took place, IMO. Second birth could have been just then.
The Horde fleeing could mean that. Or they could have been routed given the massive slaughter (over a million corpses there, mostly Scranc, as noted) with the Quya pushing them out of the Canal.

Again, the Resumption and stillbirth could be related. They could also be unrelated with a different sequence. Either seems quite likely to me.

108
The Unholy Consult / Re: Big question about the consult's intentions.
« on: August 29, 2017, 06:00:28 pm »
The Dunyain see many posibilities, thousandfold thought ok. But that doesn't seem to fit with trying to kill him outside the Ark, if they meant to use it to start Resumption. And they didn't expect that Full-Ajokli, I think. They don't forsee everything.

I don´t have the book but I re-read that sequence yesterday: It´s birth, Kellhus hologram descending, silence, wail, and the narrator tells the second birth was mercifully quick, Esmenet put away the blue baby (paraphrasing) and Achamian never knew about it. Ok, he didn't say when that second birth took place, but he describe it in that scene. I understood it took place then, but you can read that it had happened before.

EDIT: thanks Madness
  No, I don't think they expected Ajokli I doubt they necessarily expected to find Kelmomas either. But still, I think the idea that they would have preferred to kill Kellhus and use another Anasurimbor is plenty fitting, if they could. It would have still fit with the Celmoman prophecy.



As for the scene, so I'm looking at it right now on Chapter 19.
Achamian is sitting on the corpse of a Bashrag, thinking about the fact he has a son from the first birth.
The Quya attack the Scranc in the Canal, slaughtering them.
"It flees!" some Longbeard cried from the parapets above. "The Horde! Fleeeeees!"
Bunch of dudes are all cheering.
It mentions the second birth being mercifully quick and that Achamian would never know what became of it, the dead twin. How Esmenet gets rid of it.
Achamian gets off the dead Bashrag and sits on the thing's head.

Section break.

Describes the scene again with the fallen horn. Nansur Columnaries and Eumarnan Grandees watching Scranc fleeing.
General Inrilil ab Cinganjehoi yelling how the Soulless bolt from the wrath of the Souled.
Notes how many (more than a million) corpses are around.
"Then the keen-eyed spied Him, and jousting cheers became a tempest of ecstasy and adulation. The Holy Aspect-Emperor stood upon the Vigil, high on theon theward face of the surviving Horn."

109
The Unholy Consult / Re: Big question about the consult's intentions.
« on: August 29, 2017, 04:15:23 pm »
Yeah, that sounds ok if Captain Hindsight, from South Park, says so. But they didn't know that, and they wanted the Celmomian prophecy to be fulfilled by an Anasurimbor. They needed Kellhus. Kellhus's death outside the Ark might be (without Kel) a defeat, unless they tried to find another Anasurimbor to start the Object (capture Kayutas). And they didn't know about Ajokli either. Things turned out very conviniently for the Dunsult, in th end. Superbly good to read, anyway, I don't complain about that.
I don't follow the hindsight comment. These are Dunyain, they plan for as many conceivable variables as possible. We know they didn't need Kellhus, as evidenced by the fact they used someone else. The contingency very well could have been to capture or breed his other children (dude had a lotta kids - Kayutas,  Serwa, Kelmomas, Inrilatas, Theliopa, The Survivor and his son. Not clear if they knew who was dead or alive, but at least some were clearly alive). Sure, they wanted Kellhus to be the No-God. But that doesn't mean they didn't plan for alternatives. Hence the fact they packed the room with a hundred skin-spies with Chorae. There's no question in turned out well for them, but it was also not Kellhus' best play given the result of his bargain put him in a vulnerable position to be possessed/defeated.

Quote
I don't agree about Mimara's child. Or, I misunderstood the scene when the sarcophagus floats down, disguised by Kellhus hologram, before the Ordeal. Everyone is in silence. A baby wails. Then "the second birth was mercifully quick". Unless you mean that the Resumption was iniciated but not completed... but we don't have any piece of information to confirm that conjecture either, do we?
EDIT: yeah, I was always remembering that passage form TJE (Aurang telling the thing called Somanduta to protect Mimara in order to follow false and true prophecies).
RE EDIT: Or was it in TWLW?
What I mean is, the scene narratively (from what I'm seeing online/recalling, since I don't have the book with me atm) was the both births happen, then they see holo-Kellhus on the Vigil. So the timeline isn't precisely clear that it was birth, Resumption, birth. It could have been birth, birth, Resumption. It seemingly could have gone either way.

110
The Unholy Consult / Re: Big question about the consult's intentions.
« on: August 29, 2017, 12:30:30 pm »
I think the matter can possibly be ascribed to uncertainty and needing to kill Kellhus regardless. It seems possible that, even given their intellect, the Mutilated haven't fully grasped the implementation of the Carapace. So their plan gave the greatest chance of achieving their goal.
- Kill Kellhus outside the Ark, The Ordeal breaks, we research more.
- Have Kellhus get inside the Carapace and become the No-God, winning.
             - Kellhus gets in and dies, we show The Ordeal, it breaks, we research more.
- Have Kellhus get inside, kill him, we try Kelmomas.

Had they simply thrown Kelmomas in ASAP, it presents the very real chance that Kellhus survives the fight and manages to slay it. Given he's a teleporting super-sorcerer with the ability to understand certain tekne artifacts at a glance. But should he either die outside the Ark, become the No-God, or die inside the Ark, few to none could manage. It wouldn't be a stretch (imo) to think the Mutilated had the backup plan of becoming immortal via the Tekne to find a more suitable host. I still find it unlikely that their discovery of Kelmomas was much more than a kind of a fluke. And we aren't sure their own understanding of what kind of subject was necessary.

As for the second child, I don't think it is clearly born after Resumption. All that time of hard travel and snorting dead Nonmen might have played a role in the child's situation. We don't actually know if the No-God was activated yet.


111
First, conventional use of the term hell/damnation and the associated smoke/fire as being bad would imply it is a place of suffering.
This isn't even an argument. You can call anything anything. The Fanim claim the 'Heavens' of the Hundred are really Hells.

Quote
Second being essentially all dogma of the Three-Seas validate this view that people are tortured there. Literal prophets of the Gods preach them as unpleasant places for those who go there.
Various prophets and religions in Earwa claim all kinds of things. At least some of them are very wrong. All we actually know on this particular point is what we've been directly shown by PoV characters (which is almost nothing) and what Bakker has said extra-textually, which is basically that Ajencis and Memgowa are somewhat close to being right and that Fane was mostly wrong. The Scylvendi don't believe they get an afterlife at all (and are implied to be dead wrong about this). The Nonmen told the High Norsirai they could find Oblivion merely by "hiding their Voices" (and it is implied that it's actually much harder, or maybe just more random than that). The Tusk claims whores are damned, but Esme and Mimara seem to prove that isn't automatically true. Proyas' father (and the Mutilated) claim that being a ruler inevitably leads to Damnation, but again Esme seems to disprove that.

Quote
Kellhus says it is a bad place (I can't find the scene where I think he is actually there, so one might quibble as to his experience, but it does point in agreement, especially for someone who has made a deal with the gods).
Because Kellhus always tells the absolute unvarnished truth, right? :)

Actually, Kellhus' visit to the Outside is probably the best evidence we have that you're right. But he still only sees what the Gods/Ciphrang appear to be doing to the souls of the dead from his own PoV. There's no evidence in those scenes that the souls are conscious.

Quote
The Progenitors thought it was bad (supposedly), it seems like they would be very capable in verifying such a view and would do their best to (given the extremes they've gone to now avoid it).
We're back to "these guys believed X, therefore X is objectively true". For all we know, the Progenitors might have been really prone to jumping to conclusions based on little actual evidence.

Quote
We have the dying moments of Saubon that seem pretty grim.
Could easily be his last impression of dying in a nuclear fireball. Or maybe souls retain consciousness for a few instants after death before being consumed. Still doesn't prove the suffering is eternal.

Quote
The language Cnaur/Ajokli and Kellhus/Ajokli use. But most telling, the PoV chapters from Kakaliol's view made it seem like it was aware enough as to what inflicting torture was.
All these characters had a vested interest in being scary. Of course they're going to promise eternal punishment.

Quote
As far as arbitrary not being the same as random/meaningless, it kind of does, not to get into semantics.
Nope. Especially not in the way Bakker seems to use it in this context. He says it depends on whether the God likes you and that he (Bakker) doesn't know what the rules are that determine whether the God likes you. He never claimed it was random. Just that even he doesn't know all the rules (because he wants it to seem unfair and arbitrary to the readers). Bakker does hint at some rules that seem to apply, though. Premeditation, for example.

Damnation also cannot be meaningless, because the whole point of the series is that Damnation is a result of things having meaning, and that stripping the World of meaning (via the No-God) makes Damnation go away.

For the record, I actually agree that Damnation is probably exactly what it looks like, and that the Consult are probably at least mostly right. My objection is to people claiming that the Consult are objectively the good-guys. You're making assumptions based on limited information and then using those assumptions to justify genocide.

I think you're point is since we don't really "know" what damnation will be like ( and in kind, neither The Consult/Mutilated ), then their approach HAS to be evil since their design is based on an assumption. Sounds like the logic of the "sane" to me  8)
No, I'm saying we the readers don't know enough yet to say whether the Consult are the good-guys or the bad-guys. I'm entirely open to the possibility that the Consult actually know more than we do.

I do find it slightly disturbing just how quick and eager people are to construct an interpretation that justifies genocide, though.
I'm not gonna rehash the points because this doesn't seem to be an argument that can be proven definitively to your satisfaction (no offense intended, seems like enough to me). In regards to the actuality of damnation.

But I want to make note, my stance was and is 'maybe their mission has some merit', which is to say, the shutting the Outside aspect. Beyond that, I agree their actions, both related and unrelated to said mission, are enough to consider them the 'bad guys'. There are a lot of other things we don't truly know that raise questions (cosmological effect of shutting the Outside in regards to life, how many inhabited planets are out there, the actual universal number of damned versus saved, do other means of shutting the Outside exist, etc). And even if we knew all that, we could probably judge the Consult as wrong just because of their incredibly unethical and inhumane practices/methods.

112
General Earwa / Re: Do All Skin-Spies Have Male Genitalia?
« on: August 25, 2017, 10:35:49 pm »
Do skin-spies always have dicks though? I first thought they were like face-dancers, that they could assume a vag or a dick at will like they re-shape their other parts, but several parts indicate that they have dicks all the time. What's the consensus on this?
Also, skin-spies were one of the main reasons I got into SA. They're almost identical to my beloved face-dancers.
I think they probably have both and can adjust. That'd be the best design for hiding. Though, black seed isn't good for hiding either, so I'm not sure.

113
I dunno, the Inverse Fire seems pretty clear on it. You soul is shredded and devoured forever.
Yes, but what does that actually feel like, when you're a disembodied soul? It sure looks horrible to a living person seeing their soul's fate through the Inverse Fire... but that's why it's the Goad. What the IF shows could be both 100% accurate and completely misleading.

To an extent, I'm playing Ajokli's advocate here. If it were me looking into the IF, I'd probably join the Consult in a heartbeat. But that's not the point. As a dispassionate outside observer (as opposed to an observer of the Outside ;) ), I am not convinced of the moral rightness of the Consult's plan. As I said, there are a lot of ways they might be completely wrong, even assuming what the IF shows them (and what the JE shows Mimara) is accurate:

Souls might not be conscious, or might have no sense of self.
Damnation might not actually be painful. Being burned and eaten by Ciphrang might not hurt when you're a disembodied soul.
There might actually be good reasons why the Damned are Damned, even if we can't know what they are. 'Arbitrary' is not the same as 'random and meaningless'.
There might be other ways of preventing Damnation besides the global genocide one.
Finding Oblivion might be possible after all (bonus: we now know this one is true!)
Eh, I think there are enough other sources that seem to confirm the badness of hell for those within it. First, conventional use of the term hell/damnation and the associated smoke/fire as being bad would imply it is a place of suffering. Second being essentially all dogma of the Three-Seas validate this view that people are tortured there. Literal prophets of the Gods preach them as unpleasant places for those who go there. Kellhus says it is a bad place (I can't find the scene where I think he is actually there, so one might quibble as to his experience, but it does point in agreement, especially for someone who has made a deal with the gods). The Progenitors thought it was bad (supposedly), it seems like they would be very capable in verifying such a view and would do their best to (given the extremes they've gone to now avoid it). We have the dying moments of Saubon that seem pretty grim. The language Cnaur/Ajokli and Kellhus/Ajokli use. But most telling, the PoV chapters from Kakaliol's view made it seem like it was aware enough as to what inflicting torture was.

Idk, I just don't find the first three objections very reasonable. As far as arbitrary not being the same as random/meaningless, it kind of does, not to get into semantics. Either way, it is at best unfair and poorly relayed to some. As for five, we also know it is extremely hard. Three seems like the most reasonable objection.

114
To me this would imply that Yatwer, after the fact, would know they were always going to fail. That once they failed, she would have always thought (in her eternal mind) said plan wasn't going to work.
My point is that, as far as Yatwer is aware, Sorweel did not fail. In the branch of Reality in which Sorweel was head-stabbed by Kelmomas, Kellhus died (thanks to Kelmomas). So when Sorweel's soul reaches the Outside, Yatwer knows Kellhus was slain. It does not matter that, from Sorweel's PoV, Kellhus is not dead yet. To Yatwer, there is no 'yet'. It might not have worked out 100% as Yatwer foresaw, but the final result was the same, and that's all Yatwer cares about - because it is all she is capable of knowing.

Mortals are divided by increments of time. For us, Being is Becoming. Gods are instead divided by branches of Reality. Sorweel and the other WLW were sent by different Yatwers from different branches. That's what Kellhus was getting at with his "Eternity is transformed and the Hundred with it, oblivious to the transformation" bit. The No-God's approach shifts the metaphysics of Earwa from a singular path fixed by Divine Will to something more akin to the Many-Worlds interpretation of modern physics. We even get a hint of this in Malowebi's PoV sections in the Golden Room. He starts out observing the branch of Reality where Kellhus/Ajokli triumphs. Then Mimara looks upon the Carapace with the JE. Then we're back to Malowebi and he awakens to the branch of Reality where Kelmomas fucked it all up, and Kellhus is already salt. Only later do we get his observations of how we got to that point. The weird timey-wimey nature of all this is absolutely deliberate on Bakker's part, I think: he's telling us that Reality has divided, that Eternity has been transformed. Malowebi, being both dead and alive, perceives this both as a mortal (as a linear progression of moments in time) and as the Gods do (as one Reality winking out like a soon-forgotten dream, and a new Reality snapping him to wakefulness).
I think Yatwer would be quite aware a knife hit Sorweel in the head before he took the chorae out and touched Kellhus. Just because Kellhus died later, I don't see why she would inherently attribute it to Sorweel. I think it more likely Yatwer knew both Sorweel and the White-Luck warrior would always fail, but also accepts Kellhus was always going to die elsewhere (Though, this might come into doubt later, given we don't know where Kellhus is yet and in what capacity he influences the world later, if any). I assume the rationalization on her part was either she never helped them or were using them as ploys to put him in a dangerous situation.

I think what Kellhus is saying with that bit is that they don't realize things change in eternity. Yatwer thought the White-Luck Warrior (original) was going to succeed. That's how things always were. When that didn't happen, she retroactively always knew it was always going to fail. That's how I take the idea of 'Eternity changes'. Yatwer isn't aware that eternity changed, she isn't in a position to realize things can happen differently that they've already happened. Hence the, 'and when they fail, they were always doomed to fail.'

To me, I think of time as more like a stream in this instance. And the No-God/Ark are capable of changing the course of said stream. But the Gods, which metaphysically exist at every part of this stream, cannot conceive of it changing courses at all. So say the stream is changed, I see that they would rationalize it as 'the stream was always like that.'

You might be right in regards to Malowebi, though I figured it was just presented that way to up the suspense of the reveal.

115
Also, now that I think about it, Sorweel didn't really do anything that would damn him that I can think of. Seemed like a really decent fellow aside from his teen angst.

We assume almost everyone is damned, but we are only introduced to pretty scummy characters for the most part.
True enough, we mostly run into Ordealsmen, Scylvendi, Sorcerers, Nonmen, Inchoroi... That said, one shouldn't forget the phrase (can't recall who said it) "There were a thousand Hells for a hundred Heavens - so many more ways to drown in fire and anguish than to wander meadows in paradise.". I think it might have been Proyas?

116
Might be Duskweaver is unclear on the whys and the wherefores constituting individual Damnation...
I think Bakker answered the question before, in a way.

Q - Where does the judging eye get its subjectivity? In other words, why is sin SIN? In my mind, perhaps there is no answer, the God has its own reasons, its own unconscious motivation perhaps. But it seems some animals are more holy than others, some acts more heinous than others. Is this human morality (Mimara interpeting what she sees) or God's morality? Is there a reason for this morality?

A - Ad hoc arbitrariness is the problem all traditional religions share. Blind consensus covers this arbitrariness over, but as soon as you start asking questions, it becomes ever more obvious. Ethics and meta-ethics represent attempts to rationalize this arbitrariness, but can never seem to bootstrap any scheme out of the mire of philosophical disputation, leading to the suspicion that they too, are arbitrary. The suspicion in our world is that moral authority basically boils down to power. The fact in the World is that this arbitrariness is an objective feature of reality. Since modern readers rely on modern versions of blind consensus, the idea was to write a fantasy that would grate against moral sensibilities, calling attention to the plight of all morality in the modern age.

And to a different question.
A - My answer to shaik2016 covers this, I think. You need only be liked. The answer is as simple and as complicated as that. Many things the God hates, such as premeditation and rarely forgives. If one's heart is 'in the right place,' this often helps. But you have to ask Him - I fear he stopped talking to me a long time ago! Apparently he only likes those who believe as children do.

Now, this doesn't answer the actual 'what' of individual damnation. But arbitrariness might be enough to validate trying to interrupt. It is at least an unfair practice.

117
General Q&A / Re: Study of Aporos Among Nonmen
« on: August 25, 2017, 01:45:02 pm »
Yeah, I searched around the books more, but couldn't really find the why. Though, I always got the impression that the study was outlawed before the Inchoroi came as well. But that might have just been an assumption of mine.

People discuss wanting to know more about the Psuhke, but I think learning more about the Aporos would be interesting. Seems like it would be markless as well, no? Can't recall sorcerer's seeing anything beings 'pinpricks of oblivion'.

118
Indeed Sausuna. I was referring to the lack of particulars we get. When Mimara looks at Galian she sees why he is damned and his fate in the outside and we share that knowledge. With Esme we just get the bald fact that she is not damned.

I wonder how Yatwer rationalized the failure of the white luck. Maybe she decides that she was really doing something else... or perhaps she blames Ajokli.

 Even more strange that she takes Sorweel after he fails, isn't it? Or maybe he is saved because his real mother intervenes, as per Kinuit tradition.
Oh, I gotcha. Sorry about the confusion.

As for Yatwer, I assume it would relate to the nature of the White-Luck. The White-Luck is the perfect coincidence of action and fate to achieve a goal. I think Yatwer would think, 'that wasn't the White-Luck. It would have worked if it was.'

Interesting theory on Sorweel, I never thought his mother truly might have helped. But I really like the idea, given what a rough go he has. I think Yatwer would also generally be fine with Sorweel, succeeding or failing, because he at least tried in the end.

119
The most obvious explanation, from Yatwer's very limited PoV, is that Sorweel and Esmenet are responsible for killing Kellhus, for carrying out Yatwer's will. Even better, they did it filled with hatred towards Kellhus, but without any actual thought. That is the mark of the Righteous, after all, for there to be no interval of thought or reason between (Divine) Will and Action. (This is also why the Holca thane is Saved by Gilgaol, because he fights without thought, making the War God's Will manifest in the World without the filters of consciousness.)

So both Sorweel and Esme are Saved by Yatwer's Grace because Yatwer has convinced herself that they killed Kellhus. And indirectly, of course, they did. That's the hilarious thing: Yatwer is actually sort of right. Sorweel and Esmenet did set the chain of causality in motion that led to Kelmomas exorcising Ajokli, leaving Kellhus vulnerable to being salted in the Golden Room. Without Sorweel and Esmenet, Kellhus/Ajokli would almost certainly have succeeded in whatever he was planning.
Honestly, the entire situation with Sorweel raises questions to me. Yatwer were already trying to get him to assist in killing Kellhus at the same time as she has the White-Luck warrior going to kill him. Why? The White-Luck is (in her mind) assured to succeed, so why recruit and doubly aid (face magic and chorae hiding pouch) a second assassin when there is no chance of failing with the White-Luck?

We also have to question Kellhus' statements on the matter.
"When they attack me, their assassins are doomed since Creation to succeed, and then they fail as they were always doomed to fail. Eternity is transformed and the Hundred with it, oblivious to the transformation. The Unholy Ark is the disfiguring absence, the pit that consumes all trace of its consumption! To the degree it moves us, we pursue a Fate the Gods can never see…"
To me this would imply that Yatwer, after the fact, would know they were always going to fail. That once they failed, she would have always thought (in her eternal mind) said plan wasn't going to work.

@Curethan, Mimara does see Esme as saved in The Unholy Consult. At least from what I recall, can't find the reference off-hand.

120
The Unholy Consult / Re: The Vigil and the Threshold
« on: August 24, 2017, 02:34:21 pm »
I think the Threshold and the Vigil might be the same, certainly. They seem to share all the same features. Though, the Vigil seemed primarily described as (from what I recall) stone and the Threshold as iron. But a minor thing.

However, I got the impression the Barricades were truly destroyed and the Consult just put up a really good door later. The False Sun made it sound like they were 'constructions of nimil and light' and were truly shattered after their sundering.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11