Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sausuna

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11
121
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 24, 2017, 01:11:18 pm »
Well and good. I think the Gods are largely neutralized while the No-God is functional, but we shall see.
From what we have seen, they shouldn't be able to at least directly oppose the No-God.
Not that we can know, really, but things could be different this time, given Ajokli's presence in Eärwa now and the possibility he thinks Kellhus is in the Sarcophagus.
Well, it seemed like Cnaiür thought he was in there. Ajokli still couldn't see it.

122
I had a hunch it was not in TGO and thought it was WLW.  It was actually TJE:

Quote
Vast herds of sheep and cattle, bred solely to accompany the march, were also beaten across the horizon, so many that some Men of the Ordeal began calling themselves ka Koumiroi, or the Herdsmen—a name that would later become holy.

Chapter 7, not an epigraph though.
I think A fits a lot more, especially considering how their view on food prior to eating the Meat was.

Either way, I think there are other references to the idea that people outlive The Great Ordeal. It might have been the epigraph or something that sounded like someone had chronicled the events after the fact.

123
The Unholy Consult / Re: The thing we're all missing
« on: August 24, 2017, 02:11:45 am »
There was a scene from the Nau-Cayuti dreams where he sees a bunch of Nonmen staring into the fire in the Golden Room, if I recall correctly.

124
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 23, 2017, 04:23:59 pm »
Well, not to be critical of the analogy, but people with Alzheimer's can influenced the world. Memory issues don't preclude the ability to interact with things. And given Kellhus in the vision, for all we know, he was aiding Gilgoal or Ajokli for some reason. Now, I'm not sure one way or another, I imagine there are other textual statements on the matter. Just saying for the sake of that answer, it isn't clear they could or couldn't manifest influence.

Thing is that the Gods dwell in sub-realities where reality conforms to desire. The things in those realities are harvested from memories of the real world. They interact with reality through souls like Sorweel and Psatma primarily via memories.

Does the Celmoman prophecy seem like it was delivered by someone with Alzhiemers?
Really? I always thought they were just using visions for Sorweel. They also use that mud-face that the one slave makes. And he's always seeing that bird (heron? stork?). Either way, I still don't find the terminology compelling to say they are literally unable to influence the world.


The Celmoman prophecy seems like it was delivered by someone who is bad at giving messages.
"Brave King…
Brave, broken King…
Behold the son of a hundred fathers…
Behold the end of the World…"
If the wording is to be believed, though there might be more because it seems a stretch to interpret that into 'they said another Anasurimbor will come at the end of the world' with nothing else.

125
The Unholy Consult / Re: TaoHorror’s big take away from the series
« on: August 23, 2017, 02:53:49 pm »
So if you are damned and you know it ( clap your hands! Sorry, couldn’t resist – a nod to our scribbler’s new “life” ) … then ANY path to avoid it is valid and not available for moral scrutiny. The Consult/The Mutilated/The Mangaecca may well be on the “right” path if it does lead them to successfully avoiding damnation. It’s “obvious” to us they’re evil and at best, misguided … but if we really take in what damnation really is, implications, then they aren’t. Is there a better way to remove the stain without killing off so many people? Who knows, but every day you’re trying to figure it out is a day you could die and it’ll be too late.
I always felt like the most compelling idea that both sides had merits was the fact that keeping the status quo isn't necessarily a good thing for humanity. Given most people seem damned due to the fickle nature of god/the gods, landing them in an eternity of torture that is so extreme that it cannot be physically replicated by the biggest, baddest group of immortal sadomasochist torturers. Is it thus necessarily good to continue the worship of these fickle 'gods' who seemingly gain some sustenance upon the suffering of Man? To damn countless more to eternal torment because they didn't manage to hide their souls or do something to please the gods enough? Certainly, the Consult has numerous other failings and killing nearly all of humanity is hard to reckon as the 'greater good'. But their mission itself does have some merits...

Also, I know someone mentioned some book in the reading thread that had a very similar concept to what you posited. 'Your god would create something then damn those who do things wrong to an eternity of torture? Sounds like a real jerk!' Which, funnily enough, has always been a big grip about religion for me (not to derail or flame at all, each their own).

126
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 23, 2017, 02:43:40 pm »
Also, what does Skafra say that implies Celmomas wouldn't have been saved? All I saw from him was mentioning, 'our lord hath tasted thy king's passing', which seemed a reference to just knowing he died.

Right, so if we put together the (presumable) source of the name Cara-Sincurimoi "Angel of Endless Hunger," with Skfra's comment there about tasting his passing, and "souls that encounter him pass no further," the implication there would seem to me to be that the No-God is not allowing souls to pass through to the Outside, presumably this is how it "broke" the great Cycle of Souls.

It's plausible though that this is a mistake, rather it's a case of the "taste" is the "code-flash" and the cycle is broken by simply just not allowing souls back in.  This doesn't, however, square away the souls passing no further, so I rate it as less plausible.
I think the latter is more likely, as 'tasted his passing' to me reads much more as having noticed his death, just the wording in general. If it meant to imply he ate his soul, I would think 'tasted his soul' or something would fit.

Also, as for the 'shall not pass' line, I always saw that as a reference (from the context) to the unique nature of the battleplain as the location of the No-God's death. They think it is an ongoing issue. This isn't hard evidence against, but Akka doesn't seem to question the prophecy dream for consistency in that aspect. He doesn't say, 'weird that Gilgoal showed up because he wouldn't be able to.'

The Angel of Endless Hunger certainly could be interpreted different ways as well. Note, I'm not adamantly against the idea. I feel like there must be some line about the Gods and the No-God that probably explains it. Just not a reading that feels intuitive to me. But that's just me.

127
General Q&A / Study of Aporos Among Nonmen
« on: August 23, 2017, 01:50:58 pm »
Hey,

I wasn't sure if this was at all a spoiler question, but let me know if I need to add any tags.

My question was about the Aporos. Do we know why Nonmen outlawed the study/practice of it?

128
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 23, 2017, 01:10:17 pm »
@SmilerLoki, I included those quotes already. ;)

I have no idea how you conclude that Gods with Alzeihmers can do anything. We're talking about an inability to grasp or form memories in creatures that depend entirely on the memories they harvest from souls.

No more babies = no more souls. Maybe they can peer uncomprehendingly through birds or whatnot, but I don't believe the Gods can intercede from the outside.
Well, not to be critical of the analogy, but people with Alzheimer's can influenced the world. Memory issues don't preclude the ability to interact with things. And given Kellhus in the vision, for all we know, he was aiding Gilgoal or Ajokli for some reason. Now, I'm not sure one way or another, I imagine there are other textual statements on the matter. Just saying for the sake of that answer, it isn't clear they could or couldn't manifest influence.

@H - Is that how it works (the Inverse Fire)? Kellhus' statements and the glossary imply to me that whatever they see is a sure thing. Granted, Kellhus may or may not understand the device, but he seems to grasp it quickly. And basically seemed to say 'it finds your soul in eternity then parses it so you can understand in the now'. Which, if that's the case, then the soul is already one way or another. Except for the No-God being the force that can change eternity.

Also, what does Skafra say that implies Celmomas wouldn't have been saved? All I saw from him was mentioning, 'our lord hath tasted thy king's passing', which seemed a reference to just knowing he died.

@TwoMinutesToApocalypse - I know it mentions her seeing a witch as a slender ciphrang above them in the battle.

129
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 22, 2017, 08:11:51 pm »
From what I recall, this was when Akka was seeing Seswatha's vision through Celmomas, so the situation remains in question. And I think he wakes up before he dies as well. But that's the thought he has 'Gilgoal came for him' rather. And sees what he thinks is Gilgoal. Though, with Kellhus in the vision and 'four horns', hard to say.
Thank you! I remembered it wasn't very clear, not to mention happening in a dream of undetermined credibility.
I was actually reading it in regards to the Celmoman Prophechy.

Also, it was High Thane Sosering Rauchurl of the Holca who is noted as going to the war god.

130
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 22, 2017, 07:32:23 pm »
Perhaps I misread or misinterpreted it, but wasn't one warrior of the Ordeal saved toward the end? He died and was carried into the arms of Gilgaol or some such.
Sorweel is also saved.

And possibly Celmomas, since Gilgaol takes him after giving him the prophecy. Not completely sure about this, though, need to re-read it.
From what I recall, this was when Akka was seeing Seswatha's vision through Celmomas, so the situation remains in question. And I think he wakes up before he dies as well. But that's the thought he has 'Gilgoal came for him' rather. And sees what he thinks is Gilgoal. Though, with Kellhus in the vision and 'four horns', hard to say.

131
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 22, 2017, 04:39:40 pm »
Well, Cet'inigra explicitly says that what the Nonmen believed in was a lie - I took that to reference the idea that they can find Oblivion and hide from damnation. This is why he understood that Nil'giccas and the rest of his people won't really believe, or rather accept such a revelation, because it would render all the strife and hopes in their lives to this point meaningless. One has to see the Inverse Fire to believe.

But then that Erratic's soul did slip the Ciphrang (again, that might be just a lucky circumstance, as has been posited).

With regards to the JE being able to see the No-God - why I think this is hugely important is because to some extent it puts the God of Gods outside the continuum as well (otherwise inability to perceive the NG follows), which lends credence to the Solitary God interpretation. On the other hand, Bakker seems to have said that the Fanim have it totally wrong....

(this feels like we are discussing the nature of quantum mechanics back in the 1920s :D)
For Cet'inigra, I think it is so much hubris and/or assumption. The fact being that most people seemingly are damned and the paths to Oblivion are what, 'tight as an arrow's notch'. Aurang said something very similar as well in regards to damnation being inevitable. I think either some Non-men had more liberal views on finding Oblivion before (that it wasn't quite so hard) or seeing the Inverse Fire is horrifying enough to convince him it wasn't possible. And there might be yet further aspects to Elision and how finding Oblivion works that is unknown.

As for the Judging Eye, I still have to wonder how it works. The entire scene where The Survivor gets high still seems like it might hold more clues. But I think whatever it is, the God of Gods, Oblivion, whatever, that it certainly differs from the ordinary gods (imo).

132
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Some No-God considerations
« on: August 22, 2017, 03:55:39 pm »
Hi there,

I haven't really participated in the discussion here, as I rarely have the time to actively follow-up on posts but I've been reading a lot on the forum since I finished TUC. There are two thing that - to my surprise - I haven't seen being discussed and I wonder about your take on them.

(1) There hasn't to my knowledge been a very serious discussion about what the Mutilated mean when they say the No-God can read the code of Earwa by using deaths. Up to this point, the acquired wisdom has been that the No-God is a means to cut off the number of living souls and thus seal Earwa (and maybe other worlds as well) to the Outside. The entire code-reading narrative goes into an altogether different direction, signifying, at least to me, that the Ark was designed to gleam meaning from the specialness of Earwa where the Outside is closest to the physical reality and thus achieve world-sealing in some other, scientific, way.

I find it irritating that while Bakker claimed TUC would reveal or at least hint at who is right and who is wrong w/r/t understanding of Earwan metaphysics, he in fact only introduced further uncertainty. For example, Cet'inigra muses that the Oblivion approach of the Nonmen is fallacious although the text makes special effort to show that at least one Erratic does in fact escape Hell (granted, this might have been a special case, as has been discussed here). The book therefore keeps lacking clear authority on what exactly is the proper way to achieve salvation and what mechanisms allow it, and therefore fails to deliver at least on that front of Bakker's promises.

(2) More excitingly though, don't you find it highly revelatory that unlike Cnaiur/Ajokli, Mimara was in fact able to see the No-God with the Judging Eye? Literally leading to the important conclusion that the eschaton/invisibility argument doesn't extend to the God of Gods itself but just to the Hundred. I think this has immense metaphysical implications, which I am not altogether ready to summarize. It's also noteworthy that her perception of the sarcophagus didn't involve any descriptions of either damnation or salvation that have hitherto been present when she sees other entities with the Eye.
I think the code idea might just relate to how the Tekne works in general, that all things are mechanical. If we think of the universe as sort of a system (souls in, souls out, maybe souls back in or something) then the 'code' would more-so be Ark trying to understand this system through mass-death and how to shut it down. At least that was kind of how I read it, though it still raises the question of why the 144,000 if quantity of death is more important than remainder of life. Given we know the how is important, not the what (human extinction).

Can you elaborate how Cet'inigra implies/says Oblivion is fallacious? I might have just missed that part. I figured his 'we're all damned' thing was more the concept that damnation is nigh universal, not literally so. Unless I missed something specific in his musing. Though, I share your pain in regards to some of the unclearness of the layout of things.

As for the Judging Eye, I actually missed the part until someone pointed it out, and it seems terribly interesting. I really don't have enough on the concept of the Judging Eye, God of Gods, and how they relate/exist. Though, ever since the Survivor, I've felt like it might relate to the idea of Oblivion.

@profgrape - I'm not sure we should consider the No-God soulless. It required a soul, eh?

133
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 22, 2017, 03:38:23 pm »
- Nau-Cayuti is not a direct ancestor of Kellhus (unless he meant that in a more general way)

- but then why the hell do the Mutilated take this seriously at all?
Question - Do you know Anasurimbor Ganrelka II relation to Celmomas II? All I saw was that he was his successor, wasn't sure if he was specifically a son or what all. But I assume it was a general note regardless.

As for The Mutilated taking the prophecy seriously point, sometimes I think it just relates to being somewhat unclear on what will work as well. It seemed like they wanted to try Kellhus and Kelmomas was a backup plan. 'We need a soul, Nau-Cayuti worked before out of tens of thousands, there is a prophecy about his bloodline returning...'

I have to wonder if Celmomas having a prophecy featuring Kellhus around his death might actually be Kellhus trying to reach from the Outside to the Now. I mean, we already now the Outside has a very, very strange relationship with time. But I feel like Saubon seeing his own death before and after might relate to this if Akka's dreams have some truth.

134
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoiler] Minor Aurax Question
« on: August 21, 2017, 04:14:43 pm »
Do you have a page reference? I imagine it was just his blubbering (or pretend blubbering).

135
The Unholy Consult / Re: The thing we're all missing
« on: August 21, 2017, 12:56:37 pm »
I'm pretty sure the Spearman was simp,y referred to as an Erattic after Kellhus beats him.

I had been hoping for a big name.
I re-read the section after someone pointed it out earlier (because I kept thinking it was Aurang). It was referred to as an Erattic.

As to Hogman's points.
- I think the first reference really is just in regards to Ark. That the ship was at least somehow playing a role, in spite of dying. Or at least the machinery was allowing them to do more than their meager numbers.
- As to this point, I feel a lot less confident. But I think it might be the idea that Shauriatas might be within the Mutilated. Given his penchant for soul trapping magics, their spiritual strength, and their speaking in turn that the mage used in his other multi-vessel? I think it was suppose to be vaguely hinted as a possibility.

Second possibility, they wanted the Dunyain to join them. Ultimately it is very much a good thing to have four super-intelligent thought dancers at the fore. They were able to start grasping the Tekne, they beat Kellhus (in a manner of speaking), and brought back the No-God. One could debate how much they played into it, but the Consult needs all the help they can get, given the way two of their main members were whipped. Whether or not the Dunyain think they've subsumed the Consult, ultimately it is to the benefit of the surviving members.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11