Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sausuna

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11
136
The Unholy Consult / Re: Who actually liked TUC?
« on: August 21, 2017, 12:41:20 pm »
I quite enjoyed the book. The ending was a bit tough to swallow at first, I typically enjoy a happy ending, but we'll see what goes down in the books to come. I think the dark tone helped adjust my expectations given the clear line of people being damned fully on the way to the Ark. But to come so close!

As for the violence, I didn't have issue with it, though I typically prefer darker settings. My expectations were set there long ago from the whole 'we are a race of lovers' scene from whatever book that was.

137
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 21, 2017, 12:28:09 pm »
I honestly wouldn't mind Crabbicus not interacting too heavily with the Second Apocalypse proper, as it were, or not being super heavily involved. I always think the Dunyain sections were especially interesting to read and really liked The Survivor's stuff (whose name I can't remember). As long as his intents aren't like a certain other semi-Dunyain child then I think it'll be an interesting read.

138
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 18, 2017, 05:18:16 pm »
Wouldn't it have to have existed? The Dunyain acknowledge the No-God is necessary for shutting the Outside
For them, in their current situation. It doesn't necessarily mean that it was so before, when the Ark was operational.
Perhaps. I think the question remains one way or another, what unique aspect of even Nau-Cayuti, allowed him (and later Kelmomas) to become the No-God where those thrown in for over a thousand years were insufficient. I can buy the idea that Ark served the function of the No-God and they didn't have one before. But it still doesn't answer what about Nau-Cayuti worked.

139
The Unholy Consult / Re: The Mysunsai and the Red Ghoul
« on: August 18, 2017, 03:57:57 pm »
No, it was the Red Ghoul who turned on them.

"Obwë Gûswuran stepped forward, led his Triune toward the Ishterebinthi, believing it his prerogative and obligation."

He moved forward because the Quya had.  He didn't want to be one-upped.  He believed he should be the van, not them.
Was that why? I thought he moved up because he thought he should be coordinating with the Quya, that he was trying to make contact. Not sure why I got that impression.

@Wolfdrop - Either way, I read it similarly to H, that Sujaranin thought they were his enemy and attacked first.

140
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 18, 2017, 03:53:08 pm »
@H - I think that raises an interesting question as to whether or not beings of others worlds take the shape of Men or not. Always wondered if the origin of life would ever be explored (given what interesting tidbits there are for the origin of Non-men). Or if aliens also shared the same gods (given we know the Inchoroi creators had a form of worship and were damned). Either way, somehow both Nau Cayuti and Kelmomas shared something beyond blood in regards to their minds that made them suitable. As I said, I just struggle to see what that might be, given they vary greatly in several regards.

Yeah, perhaps my question wasn't as succinct as it could have been.  It's plausible that this means the Kel was near to Nau, but I thought I by framing it inside a question of "other worlds" it would mean more about the pre-Eärwa insertents, however, that might not be a Bakker took it.
Considering that the Dunsult refer to the No-God as "the prosthesis" of the Ark, and the Ark itself had functioned fully before the Earwan crash-landing, it can't be said with certainty that the No-God existed pre-Earwa.
Wouldn't it have to have existed? The Dunyain acknowledge the No-God is necessary for shutting the Outside and the Inchoroi (or was it that one Wracu) note how they reduced several worlds before. Wouldn't that imply they must have used the No-God in those attempts?

141
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 18, 2017, 03:29:43 pm »
I had the feeling for a long time that Nau Cayuti was meant to be the subject that would be the No-God, but I always thought something unique about his torment related it (so I had a crack-pot theory Kellhus was working with the Consult to torment all the Ordealsmen to recreate that to make a No-God). Anyway! Really have to wonder what about Nau Cayuti that would make him so special. I might need to reread his dream scenes.

Bakker acknowledged that my thinking that the suitability to operate the Sarcophagus (i.e. become the No-God) is a reflection of closely mirroring the soul of an original insertant.

So, we should ask, who would that have been?  My guess is an actual Progenitor.  Their sin, recall is being too close to Absolute.  So, therefor, only a soul sufficiently close to the Absolute is a candidate.
I recall seeing that answer. I was just under the impression that Nau Cayuti was the original insertant in that context. I don't remember how you phrased the question when I saw it, though, for some reason I thought it was about why was Kelmomas fine.

The theory seems reasonable, though I would still question how Kelmomas would fit. I'm not sure where he stands in comparison to the Absolute that might be similar to where Nau Cayuti was. Or (if the Mutilated truly believed) where Kellhus stood towards it.


142
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 18, 2017, 02:19:27 pm »
The other option is to accept that the Mutilated based their strategy on the Celmomman prophecy showing Kellhus as the Harbinger. Which seems pretty dumb tbh, seeing as Kelmomas isn't in it.
Well, Kelmomas would be in it, no? Isn't the entire Celmoman prophecy just that an Anasurimbor would return at the end of the world? And Kelmomas is an Anasurimbor. I think they legit believed Kellhus was the No-God, but were willing to accept the idea that Kelmomas might be as a sort of backup. And given his 'I told you they can't see me' line, that'd be a good piece of information to go off of.

I think it kind of went that the Mutilated assumed it was Kellhus based off the prophecy and bloodline. But then when they managed to capture Kellhus and heard his claims about being blind to the gods, figured they might as well try to see if Kellhus would work, but would use Kelmomas all the same if not.


I had the feeling for a long time that Nau Cayuti was meant to be the subject that would be the No-God, but I always thought something unique about his torment related it (so I had a crack-pot theory Kellhus was working with the Consult to torment all the Ordealsmen to recreate that to make a No-God). Anyway! Really have to wonder what about Nau Cayuti that would make him so special. I might need to reread his dream scenes.

143
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 17, 2017, 08:02:46 pm »
If nothing else its simply a bad title and doesnt jive w/the material in the way that hte other 6 titles and books do, imho.
What would you have named it? Seemed fitting enough to me compared to the other titles.

144
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Glossary findings
« on: August 17, 2017, 06:00:45 pm »
Are the swords Alimir and Pitiril meant to be the same sword or tragic misnaming by the Non-men? Not sure if it was mentioned.

Alimir - "Divider" (Ihrimsu). The legendary enscrolled sword of the Kuniuric High-Kings, famed for possessing the Edge Peerless, and when wielded with skill, capable of halving mammoths. Lost at the Battle Eleneot with Anasurimbor Kelmomas in 2146.
Pitiril - Divider (Ihrimsu). Enscrolled blade belonging to the Ishroi Hero Oirinas, lost as the Battle of Pir-Minginnial.

145
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 17, 2017, 04:34:01 pm »
As for the second point, I wasn't aware of that. It certainly isn't in the text, but I guess from a Q&A session.
It's mainly extra-textual, but it has also been heavily implied with Titigra in "The False Sun".

Confirmed long-time readerly speculation in the recent AMA.
By "extra-textual" here I meant that it wasn't stated anywhere in the text of the series proper, but revealed outside of it. There are issues with such authorial tidbits for readers who don't follow the community of a given work. Also, some approaches of literary criticism eschew this kind of information as non-canon even if it does come directly from the author. "Not in the text = irrelevant until appears in the text".
Not as a shot at you, but I never cared this approach in discussing canon of a series. As a critique of writing criticism, perhaps. But more often used for when people want to support what would otherwise be a wrong interpretation of text.

Again, not against you or necessarily the idea. I just remember discussing it with someone else on another forum and it just never sits right with me.

146
General Q&A / Re: [TGO/TUC Spoilers]The Boy, Crab Hand
« on: August 17, 2017, 01:34:20 pm »
I had an off-hand thought.
lmao with the hand puns.
Entirely unintentional. Also, thanks for the edit.

147
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 16, 2017, 07:07:27 pm »
Kellhus is much more than his father, but that's not the point. He isn't wielding the psuke as the Cishaurim would have understood it. First, he's not blind, but beyond that he likely (imo) is doing something with his understanding of creation more similar to Emilidis than Moenghus.

Then again, if its straight psuke, levitating a meter above the ground isn't something I'd call an exceptional dispensation of power. Perhaps it is the puske, and he is limited to part tricks like making his voice loud and floating a cubit off the ground.

---
Thanks codebread. Moved to the other post ;) .
Do expressions of the Psûkhe inherently cause glowing eyes/mouth and singing? I honestly can't recall. Not to say this can't be some other unique expression of markless magic he does. But I just find the idea that it directly relates to the Psûkhe to seem hard to fit in.

148
Author Q&A / Re: Unholy Consultation - *SUPER SPOILERIFIC*
« on: August 16, 2017, 05:59:56 pm »
Would The Judging Eye be able to see Kelmomas? If he is invisible to the gods, and the Judging Eye is (I think?) a manifestation of the gods or one god or the god of gods, then would he be invisible to it?
The is a scene in TUC where it does. It sees the whirlwind.

I'm trying to find this scene. I went back and re-read the scene where Mimara first appears at the Umbilicus and there is a scene (though it's from Kel's POV) and it mentions that she seems not to see him at first, seems to look through him, and then she slowly smiles as if he suddenly appears (maybe the Judging Eye closing?). So I think that answers my question. If you happen to find the scene where she sees the whirlwind when looking at him I'd be interested. Thanks.
I think this might be a reference to when she sees the No-God after he descends from the Ark under an illusion. She's the only one who can seemingly see through said illusion.

149
The Unholy Consult / Re: The Collected Works of Emilidis
« on: August 16, 2017, 05:45:36 pm »
I think it worth noting that Harapior could also be wrong, given the glossary entry about Emilidis.
"A great deal of controversy and confusion surrounds the Artisan and his creations, the latter because the School of Mihtrulic insisted on crediting Emilidis with the manufacture of everything save the humblest sorcerous artifacts long after his disappearance"

150
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] Nascenti of Zaudunyanicon
« on: August 16, 2017, 05:36:16 pm »
I was being kinda tongue-in-cheek with the description, but apparently Kellhus' "markless" magic - like him levitating at the last whelming (Kelmomas said he couldn't see him doing sorcery) had nothing to do with Ajokli. All Kellhus magic all the way.

Kellhus has learned so much about sorcery that he has developed some magics that are, more or less, indistinguishable from the world.

That's got a whole lot of implications.

Well, there really isn't anything to keep Kellhus from spiking the Meta-Gnosis with the Psûkhe, besides the fact that he still has his eyes.  Yet, from the lesson of Titirga, while it helps to be blind in developing the Water, the Psûkhe can still be used while sighted.  Perhaps Kellhus was on the trail of the Psûkhe and in the last encounter with Meppa he discovered the last few things he needed to know in order to wield it.  We simply don't know how things would work together, because no one, besides Kellhus, really knows (much) more than one of the Gnosis/Anagogis/Psûkhe.  Further adding the Daimos complicates things even more so.

Perhaps even Titirga could have devised something like this, had he lived longer.  Then again, he didn't have the Meta-Gnosis, so we don't know how many "inutterals" he could muster.
Well, the biggest issue with Kellhus using the Psûkhe would be the same issue Moënghus has, no?

Whenever I thought about Titirga, I always figured he was using aspects of the Psûkhe by accident. That he using the Gnosis while adding in his passion semi-learned from his youthful period of blindness. 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11