Oh, from my reading and the simple fact of the decapitants and that glossary entry and the head in a pole scene from TGO (that clearly was Ajokli), they had some sort of relationship. But, I agree, I don't think Kellhus struck any deals.
And, here's my confusion where you then contribute ALL dialogue in the Golden Room to Ajokli. Kellhus was going in the GR on his own terms. One clue this isn't Ajokli the whole time, is telling Malowebi avert your eyes.... Why would Ajokli care what a mere soul saw in the IF? All dialogue up until the point Kellhus's head bursts into flames, I attribute to Kellhus. I believe that Ajokli is there waiting for the right time and steps in when wants and then the dialogue about making them his slaves and he'll in Earth, blah, blah, blah.
I don't see how you can think they didn't make a pact and attribute all dialogue to Ajokli. Doesn't make sense to me. I agree, no pact and Ajokli just using Kellhus as a vehicle for treachery. But, I can't attribute the dialogue to Ajokli. Not at all. Anyhow. We're here, let's tease this out...meld or what have you.
Thanks, MSJ
.
For me it's the "globular black distortion" (badly paraphrasing) that Malowebi sees obscuring Kellhus' reflection about a page and a half before Malowebi see the same distortion over the other Decapitant, the one with horns, right before Kellhus head goes full-Ghost Rider.
It implies that Ajokli has already started puppeteering - as tleilaxu put it - Kellhus before Malowebi looks at the reflection at all.
I agree with you wholeheartedly here. But, then how do you, again, attribute all dialogue to Ajokli? I just don't see where your toe positions align, at all. Could you help me out to make it clearer please? I love you!
[EDIT Madness: Fixed quote tag.]
Lol, well, I still have my final TUC "almanac-ish" post to do yet so I probably won't go breaking down the text line by line until I get that done.
I'm starting to waver on "all" but I'm still on about "most." profgrape is my Ajokli-Voice, always feeding my quibbling.
Kellhus was going in the GR on his own terms.
Then what would those terms be, if he isn't relying on a divine agency to back him up when he is clearly outmatched and knows this?
On a different note, I like how Malowebi calls Ajokli "the Ciphrang-God".
On the former, I think Kellhus honestly thought he was going to outmatch the possibility of Consult-Dunyain, at least with the help of Serwa et al., given that he'd suspected the possibility "since Dagliash."
On that latter, that is interesting.
One way to think about it: it's Kellhus speaking what he thinks are his thoughts but in truth, the impetus (AKA DTCB) is coming from Ajokli. When the Ciphrang-God manifests, it's really just to cow the Mutilated into submission.
At this point, I'm more or less convinced that the Great Ordeal was little more than a contrivance to get Ajokli to the GR, the topos of topoi.
Thanks for trying to parse the particulars with me for months on end
.
Fair enough. Not that I'll agree just yet, but, if that's the case (the ordeal was to get Ajokli to GR) why wouldn't there be a pact between him and Kellhus?
This crux is really interesting to me since *so* many readers seem to have interpreted the text as Ajokli and Kellhus making a deal. I never thought this and as per usual this discrepancy seems noteworthy to me. Besides the "pacts with the Pit" line, why does anyone think Kellhus and Ajokli had a conversation and made a transaction?
Why would Ajokli care about Malowebi's soul and him looking into the IF?
For that matter, why would Kellhus? We still don't have any idea what shenanigans he was up to replacing Malowebi with his previous decapitant anyway.
Too many of the motivations behind this stuff are too dark.
This honestly strikes me as important, especially given FB's assertion that there are more than two Decapitants in play - following from his reading of
The Carathayan before even TUC.
I did, I think at some point, speculate that the "living shall not haunt the dead" line specifically refers to Kellhus' use (and perhaps misuse, if you'd like to see it from that persepctive) of the Daimos.
I'd have to check but - given that I can refer to the drafts a little more freely since Zaudunyanicon - I believe there is a line from Serwa to Moenghus in TGO regarding how "the dead outnumber us so" (badly paraphrasing).
I just don't think the "all Ajokli" explanation fits any more than the "all Kellhus" explanation.
The key is that both are entangled with each other. It doesn't seem, to me, to fit the narrative and thematic purpose if it's so cut and dry.
+1, I'm swinging around. But as above, I'm still more Ajokli, less Kellhus.
Right. I don't think it is "all Kellhus", I just do attribute the dialogue to him up until it's obvious that Ajokli has taking over. You know from Malowebi saying how it looks like Kellhus has black globular on him that that is Ajokli inhabiting him, or beginning to. I just don't think Ajokli decides to take over until....well he takes over, ghost rider style.
I mentioned my thoughts on this above - you infected me with your use of "globular" because I used it above and I don't think the text actually says that, does it?
As, Kellhus calls himself the Inverse Prophet. He brought news of the Consult to the Gods. I just think he had his own ideas of what was going to go down and not Ajokli taking over and leaving him vulnerable.
profgrape and I have talked about the "Inverse Prophet" line a lot...
He is aware of the Dunsult possibility, as per his own words. And even being a prodigy among Dunyain doesn't mean he can take many of them on without worry. Even two against one is generally not good odds, which doesn't change in a sorcerous battle. Again, he basically should assume that the Dunyain in the Consult know sorcery. They had the means to learn it and the time to do so. Plus, they have the Tekne, and Kellhus does not.
Also, at some point Serwa states that, like everyone else, her father is outmatched. That's why she later fights Skuthula. Granted, she might be mistaken in evaluating Kellhus's sorcerous might, but she is also the most competent assessor we have.
Perhaps, he is actually depending on his Daughter and the Ordeal to gain the Upright Horn and assist him.
So, Kellhus needed a wallop, and later we get Ajokli, who Kellhus is aware of (at least, we can read the Golden Room scenes this way). That explains his contingency, looks logical, and is supported by the narrative (though the latter is, of course, interpretative, as basically everything is in the Second Apocalypse).
See, nowhere did I get the sense that Kellhus was aware of the impending takeover. Aware that he was compromised, sure. By what or whom, no.
That's not saying Kellhus didn't have other contingencies. It would be very disappointing to me if he didn't. But when we talk about pure power play with the Consult, Ajokli just works.
Lol, profgrape is supposed to be making a thread... profgrape?
But yes, it seems likely from Bakker's "dead but not done" comment, and just appreciating Kellhus' intellect, that Kellhus had contingencies.
I'm still pining a Ministrate story.