Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Blackstone

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 17
46
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Aorsi/Dagliash
« on: June 02, 2016, 03:56:50 pm »
I think he was activating the nuke :). I love his only few lines, what a great scene.

Indeed 8).

I honestly just think he came to see what's up - he's out above the Horde, he stays outside the distance of Saccarees's Cants. Probably just wanted to make sure that Kellhus fell for the trap.

I agree. The nuke seems to be on a timer, so I don't know that it needs someone to activate it.


And it hadn't occurred to me until now - because I see Kellhus taking the Tekne for himself as inevitable - but that is a really interesting thought, Wilshire, that the Consult might be lulled into the thought that the Tekne-Nuke got Kellhus (though, that they don't know about his Metagnostic Cant of Translocation seems suspicious to me).

I also think this is inevitable, but I don't think it's the main point of the GO.

47
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Momemn
« on: June 02, 2016, 03:53:06 pm »

While on the subject of Kelmomas, anyone else think this is super weird?  TGO ARC, pg. 452

Quote
Ruined! Samarmas screamed, assailed him, biting deep into his neck before vanishing into his own shadow palace, the hollow bones of the boy's own thought.  Kelmomas scrunched the collar of his tunic – the one he had donned after his altercation with Theliopa – under his jaw and chin to staunch the blood.
He liked to remind him from time to time, his twin.
Remind him what it had been like before.

So... this raises a couple of theories to me.  One, Kel (and really all Anasurimbor) suffers from some form of mental illness, some kind of MPD.  Maybe he hurt himself, and in his illness called the hurter Samarmas.

Or two, Samarmas is an actual entity within Kel that can manifest and interact with the 'real' world.

Anyone have thoughts on this?
Wow! I totally missed that. I'd guess one of the two:
1) Samarmas can take control, at least to some degree, of the body they share and hurt Kelmomas--which would appear to be self-hurt from the outside. The problem I see with this is that Kel experiences it as a bite on the neck, which isn't impossible, and I don't think Kel would interpret a scratch (which is possible)) as a bite...

Which leads to 2) perhaps this is some manifestation of Ajokli, in which case, the voice Kel hears is actually Ajokli. But IIRC he has been hearing the voice since long before the sacrificed the beetle.

As it's written though, I don't see where Esmenet is, except under the falling vault.  Granted, we don't see her after it's said that Kel shouts to them and Kellhus takes a step, but that is all we get, except seeing Kellhus walking alone toward the throne.  It's said the vault falls where he was, which would be where Esmenet was too, but again, it is unclear where she was at that point.
I totally agree. But it makes more sense for the story arc for them to meet up again at some point.

48
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Malowebi
« on: June 02, 2016, 02:42:37 pm »
I believe it was that he chanted and at the same time thought against his chanting.

Indeed, that is how it is worded.  However, in a sense, isn't the chalice, as a fetish, something of an inutteral?

In the sense that it helps to fix meaning in place, definitely.   

Blackstone, thanks for the quote, I love the way that's phrased!
No problem!

Is the fetish itself a magical artifact? Would it carry a stain?

Yeah, Malowebi's sorcery is interesting. And I think that Kellhus is actually more intrigued by Malowebi's Ward than he is Meppa - though we had another thread regarding this where I feel like I've posted the same thoughts.

Agreed! He seems to be showing quite a bit of curiosity about the whole thing and seems relatively unconcerned about the actual battle.

49
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Cnaiur
« on: June 01, 2016, 10:50:59 pm »
Will Cnaiur be able to lead the Scylvendi against the GO once it becomes apparent that Proyas is now in command? Cnaiur doesn't seem to have any great love for the Consult, or any particular allegiance to their war, he just wants War.
In rereading/listening to the PoN, it's clear the Cnaiur seems to have genuine feelings of affection for Proyas (saves him in the desert, tells Akka to warn him about Kellhus, etc) and now Proyas is on the path to no longer believing in Kellhus as a god, and at the head of an army which for all intents and purposes is on a collision course with the People of War. Did Kellhus foresee this? Is this why he left, to allow an alliance of the two? Just a thought.

50
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Kelmomas
« on: June 01, 2016, 10:14:10 pm »
What changed your mind upon re-read?
Well, the first time I read it, and excuses excuses, I was going fast and taking in a lot. It seemed like all of the events surrounding Kellhus, Kelmomas, and the WLW could also be ascribed to Kellhus seeing the possibilities as he always does, and avoiding the danger (in this scenario, Kelmomas would be misinterpreting what he was seeing).

The second time, it does in fact seem like Kelmomas is able to break the WLW's streak of White Luck. Now then, would the WLW have been successful in killing Kellhus without Kelmomas's intervention? I still don't think so, but there was an intervention that I can only explain as Kelmomas having a power beyond what he should.

All that being said, it is this alone that makes me believe it. All the things that came before just seem like the bizzaro imagination of an insane boy--thinking he had made a deal with the beetle sacrifice, believing he has the Unerring Grace, etc. And I still think the voice in his head is Samarmas.

Heh, I did the same thing (burned through it) on my first read.   

I agree that Kelmomas has some kind of special sauce that stops the otherwise unstoppable WLW.  And there are plenty of signs that point to Ajokli as being behind it. 

The thing that gets me, actually, are all the signs pointing to Ajokli.  It's almost too "on-the-nose" -- culminating with Kel's conversation with the librarian.  Like you write above, everything leading up his intervention points to self-delusion. 

Semi-tangent: if the Gods are blind to the No-God, are they also blind to the Consult?
Yes, self-delusion was my assumption until I reread the end.

Blind to the Consult? That's an interesting question. On one hand I would say no, because what would make them so special that the gods were blind to them--if the gods were blind to them, couldn't they just slip by into oblivion after they died? On the other hand, if I recall the Lastborn's explanation correctly, the gods did not understand the first apocalypse or why men cried out in despair...so they must be blind to the Consult, or they'd at least have some understanding of the FA.

51
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Kelmomas
« on: June 01, 2016, 08:24:49 pm »
What changed your mind upon re-read?
Well, the first time I read it, and excuses excuses, I was going fast and taking in a lot. It seemed like all of the events surrounding Kellhus, Kelmomas, and the WLW could also be ascribed to Kellhus seeing the possibilities as he always does, and avoiding the danger (in this scenario, Kelmomas would be misinterpreting what he was seeing).

The second time, it does in fact seem like Kelmomas is able to break the WLW's streak of White Luck. Now then, would the WLW have been successful in killing Kellhus without Kelmomas's intervention? I still don't think so, but there was an intervention that I can only explain as Kelmomas having a power beyond what he should.

All that being said, it is this alone that makes me believe it. All the things that came before just seem like the bizzaro imagination of an insane boy--thinking he had made a deal with the beetle sacrifice, believing he has the Unerring Grace, etc. And I still think the voice in his head is Samarmas.

52
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Kelmomas
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:50:21 pm »
I can admit when I am wrong, and I would like to officially change my stance: on the reread, I was convinced that Kelmomas is indeed a narindar of Ajokli.

53
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Meppa is...
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:48:43 pm »
Well, it wouldn't be a proper TSA novel if we didn't have anything to debate! :-)
Ha ha ha. Indeed!

54
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Malowebi
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:48:10 pm »
I believe it was that he chanted and at the same time thought against his chanting.

Indeed, that is how it is worded.  However, in a sense, isn't the chalice, as a fetish, something of an inutteral?

In the sense that it helps to fix meaning in place, definitely.   

Blackstone, thanks for the quote, I love the way that's phrased!
No problem!

Is the fetish itself a magical artifact? Would it carry a stain?

55
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Meppa is...
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:21:19 pm »
Edit - Aurang wanted to destroy the Cishaurim, so I don't think he'd help engineer the Last Cish.

Cribbing from Madness, the Consult wanted to destroy the Cish because they mistakenly thought the Water-bearers were unmasking the skin-spikes.  Once they discovered it was the Dunyain (and that Kellhus' father was among the Fanim), they might have changed their tune on eradicating the Cish.

Possible, yes.

It would be a pretty Aurang thing to do, make an enemy for your enemy...
It would! I just don't think any of the evidence points to it being the boy, and there is evidence of it not being the boy.

56
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Malowebi
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:19:51 pm »
As we're discussing our favorite Zeumi sorcerer, did anyone else come away with the thought that the Mbimaya cant he uses included an Inutteral?  I can't recall the specific wording but it was something like "secret words" that went along with what he was chanting.
I believe it was that he chanted and at the same time thought against his chanting.

57
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Ishterebinth
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:18:18 pm »

EDIT:  Well now that I read my first sentence out loud, Seswatha being in the drivers seat in that confrontation could have possibly hindered Saccarees MG abilities.
This is a distinct possibility.

I read that portion as Seswatha taking over Saccarees in a similar fashion as Akka in the Library. Which makes the fruitless attack all the more troublesome for TGO in my opinion.

Also, in another thread way back, I brought up Akka's use as Qirri as a possible means to "level the playing field with meta-gnostic's".  Not that he necessarily made the conceptual leaps to the MG, just that it somehow has elevated him... for what it is worth.  People us the "Cleric Suicide" as an example of Akka's strength, while it gives good measure, it says he sang nothing but wards while his title in the mandate (my phrasing) was War Cant Master or something.  That makes me feel Akka is a lot more dangerous on the offensive than the encounter with Cleric seems to suggest.

Indeed.  I mean, honestly, the list is pretty sketchy after Kellhus really, haha.  I still have doubts if Akka is stronger than any meta-Gnosic, Qirri or no Qirri, but he may well be stronger than any of the Nonmen left.  Or not, haha.  It's really difficult to place it all really, since we have such little information that doesn't involve some extenuation circumstance, like the Seswatha-spirit-inhabiting.

Back to Isterebinth, was there ever an approximation given on how many of The Tall there were?  Lastborn tells us a dozen "intact", but that doesn't seem to take into the account any of The Tall that may or may not be offended by the "Vile" circumstances taking place.

I don't recall there ever being an actual estimation of the number.  My guess would be something like, "no more than a handful" but that's based on nothing at all really, just the idea that there couldn't have been all that many to begin with.
Based on nothing concrete, I'd also say a handful. The Tall were nonman heroes, so it would make sense that there wouldn't be tons of them to begin with, and it doesn't seem like there are a bunch of "normies" left either (the dozen intact and about 100 that are about to step off the deep end in my estimation).

58
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Meppa is...
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:04:09 pm »
Edit - Aurang wanted to destroy the Cishaurim, so I don't think he'd help engineer the Last Cish.

Cribbing from Madness, the Consult wanted to destroy the Cish because they mistakenly thought the Water-bearers were unmasking the skin-spikes.  Once they discovered it was the Dunyain (and that Kellhus' father was among the Fanim), they might have changed their tune on eradicating the Cish.

Possible, yes.

59
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Ishterebinth
« on: June 01, 2016, 06:12:49 pm »
That would be my guess as well, but I feel like the False Sun did give us a hint that a human can be more powerful that a nonman.

Indeed, I loved the part of TGO where Kellhus name-drops Titirga.  Although I think he is right in his assessment, he is indeed more powerful than Titirga.  Shae is probably less powerful than Titirga, even still alive as he is.  I would think that Seswatha is slightly more powerful than Aurang or Aurax.

So, where does Akka fit?  I'm not sure, I would think he isn't quite as strong as Serwa, or Saccarees.  It would seem he wasn't really quite as strong as Cleric and presumably Mek was stronger than him?  I would guess that puts Akka somewhere in the neighborhood of the top 10 most powerful sorcerers alive, but certainly closer to number 10 then even 5.  Something like:

1. Kellhus
2. Shae
3. Aurang
4. Aurax
5. Mek
6. Serwa
7. Saccarees
8. Akka
That seems like an accurate estimation. Akka doesn't have the Metagnosis, so he would be less powerful that Serwa and Saccarees.
It seems like at Dagliash, when Saccarees went one-on-one with Aurang, he threw a powerful Metagnostic can't at Aurang and it did nothing. That doesn't bode will for the GO.

I think I would put Mek under any of the Metagnostics though.

60
TGO ARC Discussion / Re: Meppa is...
« on: June 01, 2016, 05:47:35 pm »
No, it doesn't prove it wrong, but if there is evidence against and none for, then it seems like the most likely explanation is that he isn't the boy. And if all the Cishaurim were destroyed at Shimeh, then no one would be left to teach the boy the Psukhe. The most likely explanation is that Meppa, as a full fledged Cishaurim, somehow escaped.

I had a similar thought regarding the training; how could he learn the Psukhe without being taught by one of the Cishaurium?

The only thing I could come with (and it's thin, no doubt) is that he's an autodidact.  Consider this snippet from one of Scott's old interviews:

Quote
Prior to Fane, the Psukhe as an arcane art was unknown, though there are legendary hints and mythic innuendos of certain sightless individuals harnessing inexplicable powers in moments of extraordinary anguish.

Compared with Gnostic or Anagoic sorcery, the Psukhe seems more like the sort of thing someone can just stumble upon.  And Meppa's use of the Psukhe seems to be more as a blunt instrument than what Moenghus describes as "those aspects requiring subtlety."
I'll admit that it's possible, and that it's possible that he's ~30 years old and went prematurely white, I'm just saying the most probable scenario is that Meppa is not the kid from the end of TTT and that he is quite old. Simply put, the last Cishaurim with a passion for revenge so deep that his Water seems boundless.

Yeah, I can definitely see the plausibility in him having "awoken" the Water in him in the anguish of his family dying.  Indeed this could be what Aurang's "secret" to tell him was?  That he was one of the Few?

I don't know, we have such little information.  The better question might be about what happens to him now?
I do agree that this is the better question ;)

Edit - Aurang wanted to destroy the Cishaurim, so I don't think he'd help engineer the Last Cish.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 17