The Second Apocalypse

Earwa => The Aspect-Emperor => The White-Luck Warrior => Topic started by: profgrape on November 21, 2013, 10:30:58 pm

Title: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: profgrape on November 21, 2013, 10:30:58 pm
Something that struck me after a recent re-read of WLW: it doesn't make a lot of sense for Yatwer to work against the Great Ordeal through Sorweel.  If anything, it seemed like she wants to prevent No-God from returning.  These two lines from her POV seem to refer to the stillborn epidemic during the FA:

Quote
So many.  So many children born...
So many taken.

The whole point (ostensibly) for the Great Ordeal is to stop the World being shut from the Outside and the cycle of birth ending. 

It seems that either:

1. Khellus' motivation is something other than what he's stated.  Which wouldn't exactly be shocking becuase, well, he's that kind of dude.  But it's one of the only pieces of evidence I can find in the books that actually points to his having an ulterior motive.

2. Sorweel is wrong about Yatwer's motivation.  RSB clearly has a fondness for unreliable narrators (Akka in PON) and it wouldn't be a shock if Yatwer is after something less straightforward than killing the Aspect-Emperor.  It could be as simple as his being a "sleeper" as has been stated in other threads: Khellus successfully prevents the No-God from returning and then Yatwer gives Sorweel the go-ahead to salt Khellus. 
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wielokropek on November 22, 2013, 12:57:43 am
I don't know... those lines are pretty ambiguous. There's nothing in that passage that seems to prime us for thinking about the apocalypse; nevertheless, you could be right about them referencing Yatwer's motivations. It would make a lot more sense if Kellhus ends up being the No-God, because then Yatwer would be giving giving Sorweel a tool for vengeance.

Quote
The watching men gasp for the sorrow of a mother's endless Giving ...
and
Quote
"What the Mother gives ..." he cries out to the King. "You must take!"

Make me think that Yatwer's line is more about acknowledging her endless capacity for giving. Yatwer is the mother of birth; therefore, when children are born, they are taken from her.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Cüréthañ on November 22, 2013, 01:27:12 am
Always struck me as a simple battle for souls.
"So much stolen..."
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Callan S. on November 22, 2013, 09:08:23 am
I'd think simple bloody minded possesiveness about authority. Try nabbing some crooks yourself - the police do NOT like you doing that at all.

Authority likes to use it's authority to maintain it's authority. Because oor-thoor-rat-taye!
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 22, 2013, 02:22:26 pm
Something that struck me after a recent re-read of WLW: it doesn't make a lot of sense for Yatwer to work against the Great Ordeal through Sorweel.  If anything, it seemed like she wants to prevent No-God from returning.  These two lines from her POV seem to refer to the stillborn epidemic during the FA:

Quote
So many.  So many children born...
So many taken.

The whole point (ostensibly) for the Great Ordeal is to stop the World being shut from the Outside and the cycle of birth ending. 

I seem to remember a professorplum on Three-Seas? Cheers, regardless.

I agree with Wielokropek:

There's nothing in that passage that seems to prime us for thinking about the apocalypse; nevertheless, you could be right about them referencing Yatwer's motivations.

However, I do think that the perspectives of the Gods and the White-Luck get the lucky advantage of ultimate non-sequiturs because they seem to be able to reference the narrative entire from the objective standpoint of what will happen, even if they fill in gaps because they don't have all the details.

I also think that you may have rejected some considerations. But to the points at hand.

1. Khellus' motivation is something other than what he's stated.  Which wouldn't exactly be shocking becuase, well, he's that kind of dude.  But it's one of the only pieces of evidence I can find in the books that actually points to his having an ulterior motive.

So you reject the narrative implications that the Gods are blind to the actual being of the No-God? Because that seems to easily frame the tension between the Gods stringing up Kellhus' noose and waiting (erroneously, probably) to see what Kellhus plans on doing...

2. Sorweel is wrong about Yatwer's motivation.  RSB clearly has a fondness for unreliable narrators (Akka in PON) and it wouldn't be a shock if Yatwer is after something less straightforward than killing the Aspect-Emperor.  It could be as simple as his being a "sleeper" as has been stated in other threads: Khellus successfully prevents the No-God from returning and then Yatwer gives Sorweel the go-ahead to salt Khellus. 

Sorweel is constantly coming to greater realizations - we can't very well deny the validity of a coming of age tale where revelations actually change the character's perspective and offer wider focus. So he is bound to be unreliable, it doesn't necessarily add or detract to your argument, if we reject only Sorweel's perspective.

The question you've asked, I think, really suggests that the God of Birth should notice that all babies are stillborn. And that itself asks whether the souls that are denied mortal frames are sucked into the No-God Soul-Vacuum, whether they go back to the New Soul Repository, or whether they shuffle along to Oblivion or Redemption (as sinless innocents)?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Ciogli on November 22, 2013, 06:39:01 pm
If Yatwer is truly blind to the No-God, all the subsequent effects would be put down to other factors. So she can only see the effects that Kellhuss changes have wrought, and would move against him as if he was the prime mover in stealing souls. It may be that if Yatwer is not confined to linear time she may be reacting to the future changes that the reawakening No-God causes and thinking that Kellhuss is the culprit because of her blindness to it.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on November 22, 2013, 07:03:11 pm
If Yatwer is truly blind to the No-God, all the subsequent effects would be put down to other factors. So she can only see the effects that Kellhuss changes have wrought, and would move against him as if he was the prime mover in stealing souls. It may be that if Yatwer is not confined to linear time she may be reacting to the future changes that the reawakening No-God causes and thinking that Kellhuss is the culprit because of her blindness to it.
I think this is likely. Kellhus is basically the only big player other than the consult/No-God. Anything that negatively affects the God's will inevitably be attributed to Kellhus.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 23, 2013, 01:54:57 am
If Yatwer is truly blind to the No-God, all the subsequent effects would be put down to other factors. So she can only see the effects that Kellhuss changes have wrought, and would move against him as if he was the prime mover in stealing souls. It may be that if Yatwer is not confined to linear time she may be reacting to the future changes that the reawakening No-God causes and thinking that Kellhuss is the culprit because of her blindness to it.

So because the No-God rises during the Second Apocalypse, Yatwer assumes Kellhus is responsible and so moves across time to try and hinder his plans?

Just trying to get our understanding of motivation straight.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: locke on November 23, 2013, 08:49:35 am
that's actually pretty humorous/ironic if it's true.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Ciogli on November 23, 2013, 04:42:13 pm
Yes, if Yatwer is looking at the Second Apocalypse from the end of time, she only sees the effects and not the cause. Remember the slave Porsparian when he talks to Sorweel , when Sorweel talks about the possibilityof the SA he dismisses it as fantasy, because that is what Yatwer believes. So she is seeing the SA and cannot comprehend the No-God, and so attaches all the effects to the rise of Kellhuss and so sets up destiny for the coming of the WLW. Thinking she is averting the SA, and its disastourus effects.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on November 23, 2013, 08:14:51 pm
that's actually pretty humorous/ironic if it's true.
Especially if she actually does kill Kellhus and that becomes the reason for the Ordeal's failure and the eventual rise of the No-God and the shutting of the world.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Ciogli on November 23, 2013, 11:35:36 pm
Although if the WLW is in Monmen it would be a hell of a walk to get to the Ordeal in time to slay Kellhuss before the advent of the No-God.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: EkyannusIII on November 24, 2013, 01:26:43 am
Tangent: does the strong opposition of the goddess of Motherhood to Kellhus imply that his support for women's lib in the New Empire is somewhat self-serving and spotty?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: profgrape on November 24, 2013, 01:54:49 pm
If Yatwer is truly blind to the No-God, all the subsequent effects would be put down to other factors. So she can only see the effects that Kellhuss changes have wrought, and would move against him as if he was the prime mover in stealing souls. It may be that if Yatwer is not confined to linear time she may be reacting to the future changes that the reawakening No-God causes and thinking that Kellhuss is the culprit because of her blindness to it.

That is a *great* way to this, Ciogli!  I think I had fallen into the trap of evaluating Yatwer's motives from a human perspective.
Quote
The question you've asked, I think, really suggests that the God of Birth should notice that all babies are stillborn.

That's the bit that's bothering me.  The No-God is just so perfectly opposed to Yatwer that it feels like she should have been able to connect the dots.   The ignorance (or denial) of existential threats seems like the sort of trait we'd expect in a human leader, doesn't it?

Crackpot: if she's looking back from the end of time, it could be that her view is so vast that she can only pick up the broad strokes.  The ~2000 years that elapsed between the FA and SA might be compressed.  So from her perspective, the stillborn epidemic from the FA is essentially happening at the same time as Khellus' emergence just prior to the SA? 

Quote
Tangent: does the strong opposition of the goddess of Motherhood to Kellhus imply that his support for women's lib in the New Empire is somewhat self-serving and spotty?

If Kellhus knows that Yatwer's completely misreading the situation with the SA, the Shortest Path might be to marginalize her.  And I kind of think of his support for women and abolishing slavery is pure pragmatism -- oppression is bad for business in the long-term.  But oppression is great for Yatwer as it ensures her a large body of worshipers.  So much irony in the Yatwer-Kellhus conflict!


Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 24, 2013, 03:47:11 pm
that's actually pretty humorous/ironic if it's true.
Especially if she actually does kill Kellhus and that becomes the reason for the Ordeal's failure and the eventual rise of the No-God and the shutting of the world.

+1.

Although if the WLW is in Monmen it would be a hell of a walk to get to the Ordeal in time to slay Kellhuss before the advent of the No-God.

I'm betting that Kellhus makes an appearance at Momemn while the Ordeal fights at Dagliash...

Is it just me or is anyone dying for more epic Bakker sword fights? Kellhus pre-Sorcery (Mekeritrig, the Steppe, Cnaiur, Anwurat, Skin-Spies) and Cnaiur (Kiyuth, the Steppe, Kellhus, Anwurat camp, FUCKING SARCELLUS!!!) just weren't enough :(.

Tangent: does the strong opposition of the goddess of Motherhood to Kellhus imply that his support for women's lib in the New Empire is somewhat self-serving and spotty?

Well, I'd say no - but only because Yatwer is the Goddess of all of humankind's abject and forgotten, not just women (subsequently guaranteeing her the most adherents, always, as the bottom rung of the social pyramid). Birth is being personified as female but it accounts for the "bounty of Mother Earth" type traditions rather than being the Goddess Femina, neh?

So from her perspective, the stillborn epidemic from the FA is essentially happening at the same time as Khellus' emergence just prior to the SA? 

Or more likely, in this view, from her perspective the stillborn epidemic of the FA bleeds right into the stillborn epidemic of the SA and Anasurimbor Kellhus is the most glorious human leader... well, ever probably.

But oppression is great for Yatwer as it ensures her a large body of worshipers.  So much irony in the Yatwer-Kellhus conflict!

+1.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Triskele on November 24, 2013, 09:11:13 pm
Madness - Do you actually think Kellhus will go back to the New Empire?  I was rereading the conversation between Maithanet and Esmenet today.  Maithanet goes through the thought-process of why Kellhus would leave Esmi in charge of the Empire instead of a half-Dunyain.  And his conclusion is ultimately that Kellhus does not care because it does not matter.  Either the Great Ordeal succeeds in destroying the Ark, or the No-God walks and the Three Seas will be united anyway.  While we cannot know for sure at this point, I suspect that Maithanet is correct.  The New Empire was simply a tool to prepare the way for the Great Ordeal.  Nothing more.

On that note, I do wonder how Kellhus knows what's still going on in the Empire.  He tells Proyas pretty much exactly what happened between Maithanet and Esmenet.  Can he follow what's going on via some sorcery like the seeing fire?  Or is he in contact with someone?  And if so, who?

Back to Yatwer for a moment...

As much as I like the series and this fifth book, I find Yatwer kind of maddening because it seems confusing.  I'm not sure what to make of any of the Yatwerian elements.  The WLW himself, whoever/whatever he is, is confusing.  Sorweel's alleged annointment by Yatwer is confusing next to it almost as if there are two WLW's.

I also find it interesting but confusing that Mimara says a prayer to Yatwer near the end of the book.  Is that an old habit from someone who grew up Inrithi?  And since we now know that Yatwer is real, is this prayer more significant in any way? 

One of my fears about this series is that a lot of these things won't become much clearer...
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on November 25, 2013, 02:19:33 am
Madness - Do you actually think Kellhus will go back to the New Empire?

I can't see why he wouldn't return. After all, if he wins and survives, where else would he go? Zeum?
He can not care what happens to his Empire, but that doesn't me he can't return. Even if it falls into enemy hands, he can take any fortified city by himself, especially since most of the chorae are gone. After that, he just needs to preach for a few days and convert everyone back.


On that note, I do wonder how Kellhus knows what's still going on in the Empire.  He tells Proyas pretty much exactly what happened between Maithanet and Esmenet.  Can he follow what's going on via some sorcery like the seeing fire?  Or is he in contact with someone?  And if so, who?
Can't remember if their conversation happened with fire around. I image if he can watch all the great ordeal fires, he could have cast a little spell on those back home.

Back to Yatwer for a moment...

As much as I like the series and this fifth book, I find Yatwer kind of maddening because it seems confusing.  I'm not sure what to make of any of the Yatwerian elements.  The WLW himself, whoever/whatever he is, is confusing.  Sorweel's alleged annointment by Yatwer is confusing next to it almost as if there are two WLW's.
I'm equally confused

I also find it interesting but confusing that Mimara says a prayer to Yatwer near the end of the book.  Is that an old habit from someone who grew up Inrithi?  And since we now know that Yatwer is real, is this prayer more significant in any way? 
I think we are supposed to assume that it is an old habit. She was a pennyless whore, thats kind of Yater's whole thing.
I don't think that Yatwer is any less real than any of the other gods. Her existance makes me believe that there are others, so a prayer to her is no more special than any other.

One of my fears about this series is that a lot of these things won't become much clearer...
I'd be very surprised if nothing was cleared up by the end, but equally surprised if everything was explained. There will be plenty of stuff for us to argue about once TUC is released.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Callan S. on November 25, 2013, 05:22:11 am
Quote
if she's looking back from the end of time
Gah...this is where writing just becomes too obscure for me. Too up in the air. What does the described position the gods hold in time mean? Anything that comes to mind, pretty much.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: locke on November 25, 2013, 08:36:06 am
On that note, I do wonder how Kellhus knows what's still going on in the Empire.  He tells Proyas pretty much exactly what happened between Maithanet and Esmenet.  Can he follow what's going on via some sorcery like the seeing fire?  Or is he in contact with someone?  And if so, who?
slightly unrelated, but the god talk made me connect Kellhus' seeing flame with the story of the man who shoved his face into Husyelt's fire.  Same thing, I think, but do we compare Kellhus to Husyelt or to the man?
Quote
Back to Yatwer for a moment...

As much as I like the series and this fifth book, I find Yatwer kind of maddening because it seems confusing.  I'm not sure what to make of any of the Yatwerian elements.  The WLW himself, whoever/whatever he is, is confusing.  Sorweel's alleged annointment by Yatwer is confusing next to it almost as if there are two WLW's.

I also find it interesting but confusing that Mimara says a prayer to Yatwer near the end of the book.  Is that an old habit from someone who grew up Inrithi?  And since we now know that Yatwer is real, is this prayer more significant in any way? 
Well Serwe prayed a lot and kept getting her prayers answered, so I'd think we would see a similar result and a similar level of significance in the prayers of Serwe and Mimara.  Remember this is the sort of thing alongside dreams or nature-vocalizations that Kellhus dismisses as meaningless noise but from the readerly level (I feel like saying the 'meta level' has too much baggage that accompanies the phrase), anyway, from a readerly-level  it is not meaningless noise because readers get to see it, and something that makes it 'on screen' in a piece of fiction is privileged information simply because it exists.  So even though from Kellhus perspective there's lots of noise he's filtering out, from a reader's perspective we see he's wrong and there is a lot of signal in that noise because the author has already filtered it for the reader.

***

I find Yatwer and the White Luck Warrior perspectives so fascinating because they illustrate why gods are so rarely portrayed in fiction unless they're portrayed as human-analogues, experiencing time and thought the same way we do, with narrative thrust and an unshakeable belief in forward moving time.  Forward moving time, where what comes before determines what comes after, is a very hard narrative design to escape from.  And Kellhus and the Dunyain are certainly very trapped within that perconception even as other agencies and entities are not.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 25, 2013, 12:21:54 pm
Madness - Do you actually think Kellhus will go back to the New Empire? ... Nothing more.

The issue for me becomes one of "how much does the narrative move?" Is this Bakker's longest book because of sheer amount of content, info-dumping (what with probable POVs in Ishterebinth and from the Consult)? Is it longest book because a lot happens? If TAE is one book, is TUC the second half or the latter third?

The majority of all my current speculation (across threads) really assumes that the Ordeal doesn't make it past Dagliash in TUC. They win or lose there but that TAE capstone of TUC is going to resemble the end of TWP more than TTT.

So if the Ordeal doesn't make it past Dagliash, then I 100% believe Kellhus will go to Momemn and TUC will end with Kellhus having some anti-climatic (hardly) style conversation with Meppa while the Ordeal fights at Dagliash (and probably, we'll get confirmation on exactly how far Kellhus can transpose with one Cant).

Back to Yatwer for a moment...

As much as I like the series and this fifth book, I find Yatwer kind of maddening because it seems confusing.  I'm not sure what to make of any of the Yatwerian elements.  The WLW himself, whoever/whatever he is, is confusing.  Sorweel's alleged annointment by Yatwer is confusing next to it almost as if there are two WLW's.

I think, Sorweel is Narindar, not the Warrior.

I also find it interesting but confusing that Mimara says a prayer to Yatwer near the end of the book.  Is that an old habit from someone who grew up Inrithi?  And since we now know that Yatwer is real, is this prayer more significant in any way?

Mimara wears a Circumfix taken from the battleground of the Battle of the Horde for the latter half of WLW. She thinks of the symbol as false yet suggests that even false symbols afford some kind of protection (whether this is the general fear of God that humans experience with some religious iconography as she takes it off before Galian goes to rape her).

I also think that's a second or third Yatwer notation in Mimara's POV.

One of my fears about this series is that a lot of these things won't become much clearer...

Lol, how is that a fear? Imagine a series, so well written, that you don't figure things out before the conclusion (TSTSNBN) yet spawns this monument to our collective Nerdanels (not to mention, the Hoard at Westeros and ZTS).

Madness - Do you actually think Kellhus will go back to the New Empire?

I can't see why he wouldn't return. After all, if he wins and survives, where else would he go? Zeum?

Yeah, I'm definitely talking about before the Ordeal's conclusion. Since Kellhus' only objective (in my mind) is trying his hand at the Tekne, I don't believe he returns from that. I am expecting a Tekne transformation.

(click to show/hide)

On that note, I do wonder how Kellhus knows what's still going on in the Empire.  He tells Proyas pretty much exactly what happened between Maithanet and Esmenet.  Can he follow what's going on via some sorcery like the seeing fire?  Or is he in contact with someone?  And if so, who?
Can't remember if their conversation happened with fire around. I image if he can watch all the great ordeal fires, he could have cast a little spell on those back home.

I don't think there is any explicit limit to the Seeing-Flame, yet. However, I do think when Maithanet died, his final words were not for Esmenet's ears...

I also find it interesting but confusing that Mimara says a prayer to Yatwer near the end of the book.  Is that an old habit from someone who grew up Inrithi?  And since we now know that Yatwer is real, is this prayer more significant in any way? 
I think we are supposed to assume that it is an old habit. She was a pennyless whore, thats kind of Yater's whole thing.
I don't think that Yatwer is any less real than any of the other gods. Her existance makes me believe that there are others, so a prayer to her is no more special than any other.

So you two have ruled out Mimara being Yatwerian Holy?

One of my fears about this series is that a lot of these things won't become much clearer...
I'd be very surprised if nothing was cleared up by the end, but equally surprised if everything was explained. There will be plenty of stuff for us to argue about once TUC is released.

Yeah, I do think TAE as a whole is going to mirror the feeling at the end of TWP. Answers that make us question everything ;).

slightly unrelated, but the god talk made me connect Kellhus' seeing flame with the story of the man who shoved his face into Husyelt's fire.  Same thing, I think, but do we compare Kellhus to Husyelt or to the man?

Seems clear that as per the story's analogy, Kellhus is God to Proyas as servant.

Well Serwe prayed a lot and kept getting her prayers answered, so I'd think we would see a similar result and a similar level of significance in the prayers of Serwe and Mimara.

+1. I'm beginning to think many have decided that the Kiunnat Gods are Ciphrang (that is, inherently evil)... it's interesting to watch.

Forward moving time, where what comes before determines what comes after, is a very hard narrative design to escape from.  And Kellhus and the Dunyain are certainly very trapped within that perconception even as other agencies and entities are not.

Well, it is interesting to note that while many of us experience time as moving forward, we don't all similarly feel that way. We describe time differently based on cultural or social filters, injuries, disease, which all can affect our perception, thus, our description.

Also, since it's my understanding that Bakker has had the ending planned all along - what comes after determines what comes before and that truly, as an author anyways, seems the harder of the two to bend/escape.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Cüréthañ on November 25, 2013, 01:13:19 pm
slightly unrelated, but the god talk made me connect Kellhus' seeing flame with the story of the man who shoved his face into Husyelt's fire.  Same thing, I think, but do we compare Kellhus to Husyelt or to the man?

Hmm, probably compare Khellus to Angrashael (the man).  Both prophets, both married to Esmenet.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 25, 2013, 01:45:58 pm
Quote from: WLW, p74
Proyas surprised himself with his lack of hesitation. He came to his knees before the edge of the small iron hearth ... He knew the famed story of the Tusk, where the God Husyelt asked Angeshrael to bow his face into his cooking fire. He knew, verbatim, the Sermon of the Ziggurat, where Kellhus had used this story to reveal his divinity to the First Holy War twenty years previous. He knew that "Bowing into the Fire" had since become a metaphor for Zaudunyani revelation.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on November 25, 2013, 03:47:30 pm
Quote
Quote from: Wilshire on November 24, 2013, 10:19:33 PM
Quote from: Triskele on November 24, 2013, 05:11:13 PM
I also find it interesting but confusing that Mimara says a prayer to Yatwer near the end of the book.  Is that an old habit from someone who grew up Inrithi?  And since we now know that Yatwer is real, is this prayer more significant in any way? 
I think we are supposed to assume that it is an old habit. She was a pennyless whore, thats kind of Yater's whole thing.
I don't think that Yatwer is any less real than any of the other gods. Her existance makes me believe that there are others, so a prayer to her is no more special than any other.

So you two have ruled out Mimara being Yatwerian Holy?

'Yatwerian Holy' is a term I dislike. How about Yatwerian chosen?
Anyway, I wasn't ruling it. I was more suggesting that if Yatwer exists than so too must the other gods. Her prayers, because they are to Yatwer, don't make them special. She could pray to any God and potentialy have her prayers answered.
I do think that those who Yatwer has chosen are special, because she has shown to have both an extreme interest and a lot of power within the sphere of Earwa. Mimara could easily be your Yatwerian Holy, but through little fault of her own. Yatwer chooses who she will, be it one of her high Clerics, or a lowly slave, a blind man in the streets, or a suffering child (Mimara did suffer quite a bit).

Tangent regarding the Judging Eye:
A child who happens to have TJE, which might even be a gift from Yatwer as an indication of her favor, or maybe she was simply born with it. Or, yet another theory, TJE is someone's attempt to spite Yatwer (A rival God, like Gilgaol, or the Inchoroi, or even Kellhus) since TJE blocks birth. Perhaps it kills the children because Yatwer cannot see the woman and is therefore unable to give the gift of life.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Triskele on November 25, 2013, 06:17:57 pm
I totally do not recall Serwe praying and having hear prayers answered...at least not specifically to gods.  Is that what you meant, locke(snow)?

Were there specific examples of her praying to Onkis or someone?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on November 25, 2013, 06:39:52 pm
I don't have a direct quote for you, but Serwe definitely spoke of praying in a room filled with idols when she was a girl. This was back in TDTCB or TWP.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 26, 2013, 03:02:07 pm
House Gaunum certainly came to ruin. Girl prayed hard.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on November 26, 2013, 07:29:16 pm
House Gaunum certainly came to ruin. Girl prayed hard.
At this point in the story, the reader has little reason to believe that his is not a coincidence. Looking back though....
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: locke on November 26, 2013, 11:20:39 pm
I also think that Serwe prayed for Kellhus to take her away from Cnaiur.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on November 27, 2013, 10:47:15 am
'Yatwerian Holy' is a term I dislike. How about Yatwerian chosen?
Anyway, I wasn't ruling it. I was more suggesting that if Yatwer exists than so too must the other gods. Her prayers, because they are to Yatwer, don't make them special. She could pray to any God and potentialy have her prayers answered.
I do think that those who Yatwer has chosen are special, because she has shown to have both an extreme interest and a lot of power within the sphere of Earwa. Mimara could easily be your Yatwerian Holy, but through little fault of her own. Yatwer chooses who she will, be it one of her high Clerics, or a lowly slave, a blind man in the streets, or a suffering child (Mimara did suffer quite a bit).

Sorry, thought I should address this... while I remember. Yatwerian Ordained probably best fits what I'm trying to say.

Also, to what I bolded, I couldn't agree more. I've been nerdaneling that Maithanet's existence as Shriah puts a metaphysical stranglehold on the agency of the Gods and She has broken him. I pray in the quiet moments that TUC features some Erikson-level High House Cult awesomeness, featuring among others, First Sword of Gilgaol :)).
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on March 11, 2014, 05:10:41 pm
I really love that Bakker brought Yatwer into the series.  The whole mystery of Yatwer vs Kellhus concerning the No-God has brought an epic tension/mystery into it.  I'm wondering, it's easy to see Kellhus having multiple hidden motives, could the same be said of Yatwer?  Is she playing the role of 'mother of birth' to some higher end?  Is she aiming to usurp the god or something like that?  Enslave the other gods?  It seems to me that whatever she is, she is static, but you know Bakker...
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on March 15, 2014, 06:05:43 pm
Musing: the 'gift' of the few--could mean it's especially attached to the Giver Deity, Yatwer?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on March 21, 2014, 04:13:13 pm
If the Gift was somehow a divine present from one of the Hundred, why does it scar the Onta so?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: SkiesOfAzel on March 21, 2014, 08:21:53 pm
If the Gift was somehow a divine present from one of the Hundred, why does it scar the Onta so?

While i don't subscribe to the idea that it's Yatwer's gift, the Gods and the God are NOT the same thing at all.

+1. I'm beginning to think many have decided that the Kiunnat Gods are Ciphrang (that is, inherently evil)... it's interesting to watch.

Why are Ciphrang necessarily evil? They just act according to their interests, i don't see them having a morality one way or another.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on March 22, 2014, 08:33:52 pm
Some random and incompatible thoughts about Yatwer:

- She is simple a tool for the Consult?  Shae's own version of the gnosis+daimos made her a slave/ally ages ago?

- 2 Yatwers: There is The Yatwer who is real and active in the 3seas, messing around with Psatma and WLW; then there is another false Yatwer - a perception created by the Consult (or my own favorite: crowds of dunyain/cishaurim just off stage) to manipulate Sorweel/Zeumi prince/others.

- If Kellhus hopes to ultimately mold the Zeumi prince into a believer-king to take the circumfix to Zeum, then it's pretty neat that Kellhus' future agent and Yatwer's agent are best buds.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on March 23, 2014, 11:29:12 am
+1. I'm beginning to think many have decided that the Kiunnat Gods are Ciphrang (that is, inherently evil)... it's interesting to watch.

Why are Ciphrang necessarily evil? They just act according to their interests, i don't see them having a morality one way or another.

Mostly because angelic Ciphrang were mentioned in an interview.

However, you could be right... but it could also be that they are the aggregate of negative human desires? Or simply anthropomorphisms of evil?

Some random and incompatible thoughts about Yatwer:

- She is simple a tool for the Consult?  Shae's own version of the gnosis+daimos made her a slave/ally ages ago?

...

- If Kellhus hopes to ultimately mold the Zeumi prince into a believer-king to take the circumfix to Zeum, then it's pretty neat that Kellhus' future agent and Yatwer's agent are best buds.

Probably the instances that Sorweel has interacted with are real. And what happens in the Catacombs is pretty convincing of Psatma's direct line. Neither seem like they could be a product of the Consult.

Sorweel is convinced, despite Kellhus' or Yatwer's manipulations. The war is real, whether Kellhus' intentions to destroy the Consult are.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: SkiesOfAzel on March 23, 2014, 01:02:30 pm
Mostly because angelic Ciphrang were mentioned in an interview.

I'd forgotten that piece of info. What i meant by my comment is that they seem more amoral than evil to me. But if they hunger for souls, they are by definition Ciphrang. The Nonman King's shade remarks that although it dreams it is a God, it hungers and Gods shouldn't hunger.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on March 24, 2014, 01:36:54 pm
It's the way that they have to hunger, I guess? Like Mimara describes seeing the consequences of Damnation as torment, assuming we can trust her visions. Torment seems evil to our humanness?

Regardless, I got the amoral comment... I went back and read the context of my comment and I'm not sure what motivated that brackets... usually, I have something pretty specific in mind.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: SkiesOfAzel on March 24, 2014, 04:27:01 pm
I went back and read the context of my comment and I'm not sure what motivated that brackets... usually, I have something pretty specific in mind.

It's the darkness that comes before all of us :P
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on March 25, 2014, 10:20:33 am
May we all know this in some way :) - though, in this case, I am the darkness that came after the darkness that came before.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on March 25, 2014, 10:57:46 am
TUC must contain an angelic ciphrang!
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: SkiesOfAzel on March 25, 2014, 11:46:40 am
Lol it's Scott we are talking about, the difference between angelic ciphrang and regular ones might simply be the use of lube ;)
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on March 25, 2014, 12:20:46 pm
"touched by an angel"
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on March 28, 2014, 05:26:30 pm
Lol it's Scott we are talking about, the difference between angelic ciphrang and regular ones might simply be the use of lube ;)

I've looked at the quote several times and I'm not convinced that it even suggests there even are Angelic Ciphrang.

I like your amoral argument. As it goes, damnation is subjective. The Ciphrang might just be hungry, and would probably not appreciate being called evil, or even amoral.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on April 09, 2014, 03:17:13 am
Yatwer can hide a face from the Dunyains and a chorae too.  What else could she hide?  Could she hide a sorcerer's mark?  Perhaps this is an added bit to the WLW's notched blade--it does not appear notched to Kellhus' eyes.  Of course, maybe meta-gnostic-daimos allows him to see past all that.  :)
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on April 09, 2014, 09:16:17 am
You just suggested elsewhere that the pouch is a sorcerous object hiding the Chorae, MG...
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on April 09, 2014, 03:03:33 pm
You just suggested elsewhere that the pouch is a sorcerous object hiding the Chorae, MG...
"Mundane" explanations do not rule out higher intervention. Perhaps Yatwer sanctioned the sorcery used to craft the pouch such that it didn't leave a mark. It can be both sorcerous and 'divine'.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Somnambulist on April 09, 2014, 03:43:56 pm
Why are we so convinced that the Anasurimbors can't sense the chorae in the pouch?  They all played along with Sorweel's belief that Yatwer was hiding his face, when in fact Serwe reveals that he truly was the enemy part of the Niom.  If he actually was a Believer King, they would have chosen someone like Zsoronga instead, since he obviously hates them.  Sorweel was running around thinking he'd fooled them all, when that wasn't the case.  I think they all just played along with his beliefs to get him to do what they wanted (standard operating procedure for dunyain).  The greatest manipulators of men in the world would hardly let on to Sorweel (basically an infant to them) that they knew his dirty little secret.  They played him from the start.  They knew about the chorae (imo), which was why Serwe wouldn't take the pouch from him.

Unless I've forgotten a crucial piece of evidence, which is altogether possible.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on April 10, 2014, 12:46:21 pm
Makes sense to me. I could have sworn that possibility was brought up in the thread somewhere but couldn't find it to quote it for you :P

There is just too much mystery to penetrate. Without the POV's of the Dunyain to corroborate either side its all conjecture.

It is extremely coincidental that Sorweel is being sent to "play the part" of an enemy within the Niom pact, and I just don't really believe there are too many true coincidences in the books. Based on what I heard from Chapter 3, it seems like Serwa at least cannot 'see' Sorweel (and this bothers her a lot). The daughter is not the father though, and they could be as oblivious to Kellhus' true plans as everyone else.

I'd like to avoid drifting to either extreme opinion of the dunyain/Kellhus. I don't think he/they are ignorant or omniscient, but rather somewhere in between. It is just difficult to know where to draw that line.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Somnambulist on April 10, 2014, 02:34:00 pm
I'd like to avoid drifting to either extreme opinion of the dunyain/Kellhus. I don't think he/they are ignorant or omniscient, but rather somewhere in between. It is just difficult to know where to draw that line.

I definitely agree.  I just don't remember seeing the argument against in the thread.  They're definitely fallible but they thrive on contingencies and adaptability.  I honestly don't have a strong feeling either way, but these rabbit holes keep getting deeper and deeper.   :)  I likes me some rabbit holes.  Which reminds me of another topic that occurred to me, but I'm not sure where to put it.  I'll have a look.

Oh, and I kept saying 'Serwe' when I obviously meant 'Serwa.'  Oops.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on April 10, 2014, 03:50:04 pm
I like the idea that the pouch chorae is a decoy for the reader.  We expect it to be significant, but really it's been premeditated and the move after that has been premeditated, but the move after that?  There has to be SOMETHING that blindside's the dunyain's in TUC.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on April 10, 2014, 04:46:59 pm
Oh, and I kept saying 'Serwe' when I obviously meant 'Serwa.'  Oops.
I mess this up all the time. My recent read of TDTCB helped straighten it out a bit, but it is still irritating. Why change one letter :P
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: SkiesOfAzel on April 10, 2014, 05:12:38 pm
Why are we so convinced that the Anasurimbors can't sense the chorae in the pouch?  They all played along with Sorweel's belief that Yatwer was hiding his face, when in fact Serwe reveals that he truly was the enemy part of the Niom.  If he actually was a Believer King, they would have chosen someone like Zsoronga instead, since he obviously hates them.  Sorweel was running around thinking he'd fooled them all, when that wasn't the case.  I think they all just played along with his beliefs to get him to do what they wanted (standard operating procedure for dunyain).  The greatest manipulators of men in the world would hardly let on to Sorweel (basically an infant to them) that they knew his dirty little secret.  They played him from the start.  They knew about the chorae (imo), which was why Serwe wouldn't take the pouch from him.

Unless I've forgotten a crucial piece of evidence, which is altogether possible.

I am sure they suspect, but i am not convinced they are certain. They seem to worry when they keep seeing love in his eyes. I would go as far as to say that the  gymnastics demonstration between Serwa and Moe was probably meant to make him reconsider his affections.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on April 10, 2014, 08:22:05 pm
I would go as far as to say that the  gymnastics demonstration between Serwa and Moe was probably meant to make him reconsider his affections.
This is the overall problem with an unfinished story and characters that are known to lie about everything.

I like this idea, but they fully convinced me they where telling the truth that I never saw it. Now I'm torn :P.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: SkiesOfAzel on April 10, 2014, 08:45:08 pm
I would go as far as to say that the  gymnastics demonstration between Serwa and Moe was probably meant to make him reconsider his affections.
This is the overall problem with an unfinished story and characters that are known to lie about everything.

I like this idea, but they fully convinced me they where telling the truth that I never saw it. Now I'm torn :P.

Lol, i am not saying they lied about their relationship, i am just saying that they timed their push-ups so that Sorweel would bump into them and get jealous. You can have your cake and eat it too ;)
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: locke on April 10, 2014, 10:17:40 pm
Lol, i am not saying they lied about their relationship, i am just saying that they timed their push-ups so that Sorweel would bump into them and get jealous. You can have your cake and eat it too ;)
Wait, you mean this is something people didn't get?  Like it wasn't obvious they were setting up Sorweel to trigger jealousy?

Suddenly all the complaints about that scene make a lot more sense.  Really?  How did people miss that?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Cüréthañ on April 10, 2014, 11:27:52 pm
The narrative deliberately obfuscates the nature of K & E's kids to huge effect, locke. 
I think readers like you and I are constantly searching for hints as to what is 'really going on', but the clues are often slight and often contradictory, so much so that it is very easy just to assume they cancel each other and stick to interpreting actions only or just 'miss' things because one is looking for confirmation of other hints.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on April 12, 2014, 12:14:28 pm
So many unknowns.

I will say that Kellhus must be able to sense the discrepancy between Sorweel's face and his actions. Whether Kellhus knows who is responsible for the Mask or not, it would be fairly obvious to him from his inability to predict Sorweel's actions from his face.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on April 12, 2014, 08:15:49 pm
So many unknowns.

I will say that Kellhus must be able to sense the discrepancy between Sorweel's face and his actions. Whether Kellhus knows who is responsible for the Mask or not, it would be fairly obvious to him from his inability to predict Sorweel's actions from his face.

Makes me think of Kellhus' inference that Old Moe detected the skin spies because of their voices.  Can Serwa and co pull the same trick?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on April 12, 2014, 10:03:41 pm
You just suggested elsewhere that the pouch is a sorcerous object hiding the Chorae, MG...

I hadn't thought about it, but I think I assumed that divine intervention and sorcery were on the same continuum.  Maybe like this:

1) Divine Intervention: Magic directly from the outside into the world--it is "markless" because it's mark simply is it's being--divine will/desire holds up every moment/atom of existence both following 'natural laws' and the 'transgress' of such (bunny ears because there wouldn't be laws or transgressions because every act unfolds according to the Plan)

2) Sorcery: Magic from the world to the world--it is "marked" because it is crosses #1

3) Psukhe: Magic from the world to the world 'as if' it came from the Outside or perhaps it's just #1 and a blind human is the conduit.

To me, this would mean we could have 2 or 3 kinds of magical objects.  Most would be like Mim's knife, but some would be like Sor's pouch.  Objects like this could be hiding anywhere!  Does Kellhus have some?  Like a sword that hides a chorae in its blade?

Madness, what do you think?
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on April 15, 2014, 11:32:44 am
Hmm... I am increasingly tired and distracted but this brings us back to the age old question of distinguishing works by Psatma, works by the Cishaurim, and works by Sorcerers.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Wilshire on April 25, 2014, 11:49:46 pm
Lol, i am not saying they lied about their relationship, i am just saying that they timed their push-ups so that Sorweel would bump into them and get jealous. You can have your cake and eat it too ;)
Wait, you mean this is something people didn't get?  Like it wasn't obvious they were setting up Sorweel to trigger jealousy?

Suddenly all the complaints about that scene make a lot more sense.  Really?  How did people miss that?

lol Zing! If only we where all as smart and quick-witted as you locke. Imagine, the world through the eyes of god such as yourself :P.
The narrative deliberately obfuscates the nature of K & E's kids to huge effect, locke. 
I think readers like you and I are constantly searching for hints as to what is 'really going on', but the clues are often slight and often contradictory, so much so that it is very easy just to assume they cancel each other and stick to interpreting actions only or just 'miss' things because one is looking for confirmation of other hints.
Constantly searching makes it likely you'll find something, but that doesn't mean its there. Forcing meaning into a meaningless passage ;) (not specifically this instance, just generally)
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: mrganondorf on May 09, 2014, 01:43:39 am
Was just rereading, maybe Yatwer was present at Akka and Mimara's first meeting?

Akka was yelling at Mimara, he wanted her to tell him why she had come...

"She flinched, looked down to the childish scribble at her feet: a gaping mouth scrawled in black across mineral white, with eyes, nose, and ears spaced across its lipless perimeter."

The Judging Eye, US edition, p. 48, a few pages into chapter 2.
Title: Re: Yatwer and the Greal Ordeal
Post by: Madness on May 09, 2014, 03:03:27 pm
So creepy. Communication and coordination are important parts of engagement (like getting shit done). If all Yatwerians communicate individually with their Goddess... she directs any or all of them...