Reading more, I think it's clear that Pauli had at least read Hegel. Anyway, moving on in the pdf, I really like this part:
Pauli’s suggestion to consider mind and matter as complementary aspects of the same reality has sometimes been misunderstood in the sense that conscious human observers need to be included as an essential new feature of quantum mechanics. Pauli clarified this misrepresentation succinctly:
“Once the physical observer has chosen his experimental arrangement, he has no further influence on the result which is objectively registered and generally accessible. Subjective properties of the observer or his psychological state are as irrelevant in the quantum mechanical laws of nature as in classical physics.”
That makes a ton of sense to me, that they would be "complementary" but not dependent. Also, it would seem to me sort of self-evident that in setting up the experiment, the experimenter is enforcing a certain conceptual frame in what is to be (or even could be) observed, by virtue of the scope of the experiment. This is part of why I do imagine there being a very real limit to "science."
If one takes the idea of a symmetry breaking seriously for the relation between mind and matter, the starting point for advancements in its understanding has to be the relationship between parts and wholes.
This makes me wonder about sort of categorizing Mind as something that can imagine (rightly or not) itself as something apart from Matter.
That is to say, something that can direct itself, rather than only be directed?