You said Bakker said he didn't love her, when in fact his statement proved that he did.
I said nothing of the sort. I don't even understand where you got that. Like, really, where...?
It did effect the story, the plot and Kellhus's actions.
But of course!
Seems when someone didn't see the signs and get it right, its not worthy of their time or discussion. Funny how that works.
It's again way more complicated than that. Trust me, I see the signs. I just don't think that conventional explanations work for an unconventional series.
Like with that dream where the Heron Spear misses. After Mimara starts using the Judging Eye in fairly interesting ways, my first thought was - "someone like that defeated the No-God, not the Spear". But under scrutiny it's so extremely obvious and simplistic I have trouble to believe Bakker will go for it (it's, in my opinion, on a "Harry is a horcrux" level, and Bakker is not Rowling; nothing wrong with Rowling, he just isn't). Maybe some facet of it, but not all of it.
Though there always is, of course, a possibility of overthinking things.
[EDIT]
Well I'm not concerned with what interests you or not, or what you feel what is worthy to discuss
Oh, just to clarify. I'm not saying you or others shouldn't discuss it, I merely give notification that I won't so there is no hard feelings when I say something like "I don't see it like that" and stop participating in the discussion. I never tell people what they should or shouldn't do, I'm too focused on myself for that!