Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hiro

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 17
196
Unless that answer is "Seswatha gave them the map" :-)

Not very elegant, though...

G-strings rarely are  ;)

197
Unless that answer is "Seswatha gave them the map" :-)

Which would not totally surprise me.

198
The Unholy Consult / Re: Crazy speculation only
« on: May 06, 2017, 05:14:04 pm »
Not so crazy, perhaps:

Achamian and Kellhus enter the Ark, echoing the dreams...echoing Frodo and Sam?

199
The Unholy Consult / Re: Crazy speculation only
« on: May 03, 2017, 09:57:55 pm »
Iyokus will engage in a Daimotic battle...

200
General Earwa / Re: TSA related art and stuff. (VI)
« on: March 21, 2017, 09:19:28 pm »
Redux of my old Akka v. Zioz.

War-cant Master

http://spiralhorizon.deviantart.com/art/War-cantMaster-low-669697552

BTW, thanks for fixin' the permissions, guys!

A-MAZING work!!!

201
General Earwa / Re: The Unholy Consult - The Bad News and the Good
« on: March 15, 2017, 12:51:44 pm »


2) Bakker has done some super subtle foreshadowing going all the way back to the PON books.  I would like to hint about that, but it’s just too wonderful.  Once you finish TUC, you’ll def want to start the whole journey over.  I know that you know Bakker did this, but the way he did it was surprising and unlooked for.  There are parts of the previous 6 books that foreshadow events in TUC that do not seem to be foreshadowing moments or seem to foreshadow something else entirely.



By the by, I think foreshadowing and subtle foreshadowing in particular (Little, Big - anyone?) - is one of the most integral and enjoyable essentials of storytelling. Therefore, this makes me glad.

And, uhm, when can we expect an excerpt...?


202
General Earwa / Re: The Unholy Consult - The Bad News and the Good
« on: March 14, 2017, 09:28:53 pm »
Thanks for these enticing morsels, MG!

205
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 07, 2016, 03:08:08 pm »
That's a good link. What conclusions do you draw from that information?

Here's what I see when I look at that link:
What's left out?
Socioeconomics - Most high crime areas tend to be racially skewed towards non-white population centers.
Race of police officers - May or may not be relevant, but is it still 'racism' if the police that are doing the shootings are all black? Sure, but its not the same kind of racism if all the police are white. To me, I think that kind of information (which isn't available), would change the conversation a lot.

What kinds of other conclusions could be drawn?
The take away could be that the real problem is sexism. Men get killed proportionally more than women, by an enormous margin.
Same with age. Huge margins.
Where are those protests? Men's Lives Matters. Children's lives matter. Non existent, why might that be?


Suggesting, by looking at those numbers, that the only problem (or biggest problem) is racism, requires cherry picking data. If anything, its very clearly unclear, at least to me.

How good is this information?
Only about 50% of the people who are killed are of a known race (according to this article).
50%? How can you draw any statistically valid conclusions with a margin of error of 50%?


For me, in the end, in the last two years this article indicates that some 2000 people have been killed by police. In the same time period, 5 million people have died in the US. Nearly 100,000 have died from suicide over the same two year period. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm - extrapolate for 2 years). The idea that every time someone is killed by a police officer it needs to be national news is totally ludicrous to me. At best, its local or state news. Expanding that to weeks long national news seems odd to me.

At best, it seems what we're talking about are statistical anomalies based on incomplete data sets that don't properly cross reference other relevant data sets.


I'm not saying that racism doesn't exist, nor that it isn't a problem. I'm saying that  one must be careful what conclusions are drawn - and closely examine the why behind those conclusions. If you're stance is that these numbers portray an obvious racism problem, why? It could be that they do, but I'm interested in why.

Thanks Wilshire for taking the time to look at that link.

The reason I put up that link was that it seemed fairly evenhanded. Although thinking about it a bit longer;

The main problem with that link, amongst a few you cite, is that it does not specify the reason people get killed by police. So if you want to base yourself on data, - in this case -, it needs way more specific information. The link I posted earlier provides more context:

http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/9/21/12993866/terence-crutcher-unarmed-killed-black-lives-matter

In a similar way, I don't see the value of comparing the amount of people getting killed by police with people committing suicide, or even the total amount of people dying in a year. If data ignores reason -- intent -- context, than the data serves to explain what exactly?

There should be a correlation between data and actual lived experience. Even one person getting killed in this manner by the police is a horrible tragedy, I don't mind Black Lives Matter bringing this to attention. And if it helps reflection on police violence in general, all the better.

Also, Black Lives Matter exists in a social and historical context, it's not just an anomalous blip.

206
General Misc. / Re: What are you watching?
« on: November 07, 2016, 02:12:49 pm »
Arrival was a pretty interesting film!

207
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 07, 2016, 02:11:36 pm »
And actually, your description of Black Lives matter as being "shockingly racist" is rather ignorant and insensitive. You seriously haven't wondered why such a movement felt the need to raise their voice?
There's actually some fascinating research on this subject, though unfortunately you'd have to filter out political bias/rhetoric, as most of the research on the subject is done by the opposition party.

In general, I find data the best lense to look through these types of subjects, when such data exists. Racism, sexism, etc-isms. There's a lot out there, especially in the US, just be careful what conclusions you draw from whichever bias its being filtered through before you get to it. Without the citation of relevant and complete statistical evidence, these conversations may as well be impossible to have, as either side just talks past the other until both are too upset to continue (speaking generally, not specifically this post)

This seems fair enough:

http://www.vox.com/a/police-shootings-deaths

208
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 07, 2016, 01:21:00 pm »
So, let me say something about my background now. I'm Polish and white, like most of people in Poland. But I am also a woman, a socialist liberal and a nerd - which at the moment means that I am outside the official discourse of our government and state-owned media. Since our last election (a year ago) everything is becoming more nationalistic, isolationistic and xenophobic. And, oh, they wanted to ban abortion in any circumstances (currently it's allowed only if pregnancy is dangerous for the woman's life, the embryo is unable to live or heavily disfigured or if the pregnancy is the result of crime). Anyway, this discourse promotes the skinhead, neo-nazi types as modern Polish patriots. The result is racist attacks, mostly on Arabs (you know, the whole islamic threat and all that), but recently a Polish professor of history was beaten on the tram because he was talking in German to his colleague, a German professor of history.
Our Independence Day is coming. 11 November, the Armistice Day. And you know what - we warn our non-Polish friends to better stay at homes on that day (fortunately, it's a holiday, so they do not have to go to work or school) or they might get beaten by our brave young Polish patriots.
And you know what? I love my country and I hate it at the same time. I don't want to leave, but I'm so afraid it will get worse and worse. I've survived the communist regime, early 21st century seemed to be all bright and promising, membership in NATO and EU, open borders, open minds... and now it's all falling apart.
So yes, I am offended. I am offended by racist jokes and comments, I am offended by anti-gay rhetorics, I am offended by our women-hating government. I never thought I would go marching in the streets, and yet during this year I did it several times. It won't change anything but at least I can see that I'm not alone.

Thanks for sharing Alia, and good for you to stand up!

209
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 07, 2016, 01:19:24 pm »
I am very very very sorry for the racist harrasment you had to deal with MSJ :(
In my life I have never encountered racism until I was a regular in the Internet.I have encountered Brown,Black,white,ginger and even a few Asian people and never did I saw any racism. Simply the idea of judging people based on their skin color is too stupid and inane for me to understand and still it is.Also I have to agree about the people getting easily offended thing ( no I don't mean you Hiro) the whole " black lives matter " movement for example is shockingly racist. Black lives??! WTF. All I know is you don't call someone black or white unless you are describing them. Does skin color really matter in anything? How can someone be that inane? Understanding how can someone judge another from their skin color is beyond my level of intelligence.Racism stops when people stop saying black and white people. This is it. Again I am sorry MSJ for what happened to you, I really am.

You do realize, - if you have taken the time to read my posts -, that I was not offended in the first place, right? Apparently just using the word 'racist' was enough for people to think I was, funny how that works, I mean: who is actually feeling offended? I do not feel the need to reiterate my points again. See the other thread.

However, just because you feel that skin color doesn't matter, does not mean that there is no racism in society at large. And actually, your description of Black Lives matter as being "shockingly racist" is rather ignorant and insensitive. You seriously haven't wondered why such a movement felt the need to raise their voice?
First of all I think that you should know something about me. I am not American, I am Egyptian.Second I don't think you have read my post, "Also I have to agree about the people getting easily offended thing ( NO I DON'T MEAN YOU HIRO) " you probably have missed this last bit  :)
Last I know about the American cops shooting black people thing, when that happens you protest against cops shooting people. Aren't black people normal people or what??  you see I am a Muslim too and right now Muslims ( I know that Islam is not a race but I don't know a better word) are getting racism from most people in Europe and America alike. Do you see me screaming RACISM every single second? If so then Bakker's books are racist. The Fanim never won a battle in the Prince Of Nothing trilogy. Self wallowing for no reason is stupid.That's it for now.

Well, I'm not American either, does that matter? I did read your post and responded specifically to your reference to me. To reiterate I was not offended in the first place, so to mention my name as possibly being offended was unnecessary and rather silly. It continued to extend a misunderstanding, hence my comment.

As I understand the Black Lives Matter movement, it's not merely about people getting shot by the police. It's about a lot of black people getting shot - without any provocation that would warrant such an extreme measure. There is also a painful amount of examples of white people not getting shot in similar circumstances or even in circumstances that - according to US Law - would justify extreme measures.

See for further explanation: http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/9/21/12993866/terence-crutcher-unarmed-killed-black-lives-matter

Self wallowing has nothing to do with it, anyhow, it is more useful and valuable to get oneself informed.

210
General Misc. / Re: The Offended Eye
« on: November 07, 2016, 01:01:26 pm »
Great points, H. As alwaays, my question is how do break the chains of this mindset of us vs them?

MSJ, sorry, I didn't see this thread before. I have just posted a reply in the 'What are you watching' thread, was busy these past few days. I'll read this thread and respond as well. Regards.

Glad you seen the thread, as I am very interested in your thoughts. To go back to what you said in the other thread, It hit the nail on the the head as to why I liked Wilshire's statement. I see people that get offended over perceived slights at them or what they feel to be a negative comment.

MSJ, thanks for sharing your experience and background. That is certainly courageous, and I would venture to guess that your experience would lead you to be more able to empathize with people experiencing racism.

Still, I'm puzzled why you felt the need to devote a whole thread to something that grew out of a misunderstanding. If it contributes to a more thorough discussion, why not.

And while I made a case for communicating intent, another case can be made to be suspicious of intent as well. Intent is not neutral by any means, and even if we feel or are convinced that our intent is right, that does not make it so. There are certainly instances where no matter the intent, the outcome is correctly experienced as offensive. To then claim, my intent was maybe not clear to you, is another way of saying - I don't care so much about you as another person.

The internet facilitates misunderstandings and offenses, as it, - as we concluded in the other thread- , 1) lacks face to face or even body to body communication, so lacks the full communicational context, and, 2) when people feel anonymous, or unobserved, they apparently feel less restraint to unleash their inner demon.

To me, this whole discussion of being offended, of political correct / incorrect speech, is all related to a fundamental misunderstanding of freedom of speech in particular, and to the currently most misunderstood or abused word in this and many other languages: freedom.

So I suggest another candidate for your 'statement of statements': "Know Thyself."


Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 17