Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - profgrape

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 27
46
After listening to the spoiler section a few times, it's pretty revealing as far as Bakker goes.  In describing the relationship between the Gods and the World, Bakker draws from Kahneman's two distinct modes of decision making: System 1 (fast, unconscious, automatic, error-prone) is the Gods; and System 2 (slow, conscious, deliberate, reliable) is the World. 

What kind of blew my mind (hey, that's the name of the podcast!) was how these constructs relate to several other metaphysical concepts raised in the series:

System 2 => World, Conscious, Object, Watched
System 1 => Outside, Subconscious, Subject, Watcher
System 0 => No-God, Unconscious, Absolute

In short, the series itself is an allegory of human cognition!  Which is pretty cool. 

A spoilerific thought stemming from this way of imagining the world:

(click to show/hide)
So that's why sealing the World is necessary, not just because of damnation but because it removes the subject (God) and everything collapses into object...

Yes.  To be clear, though, the interpretation about meaning and the NG is mine, not Bakker's.  :-)

Also, the NG facilitates the sealing rather than doing the sealing.  But I think that the method of sealing is only possible with the God of Gods (and therefore, the Gods) removed from the board.

47
After listening to the spoiler section a few times, it's pretty revealing as far as Bakker goes.  In describing the relationship between the Gods and the World, Bakker draws from Kahneman's two distinct modes of decision making: System 1 (fast, unconscious, automatic, error-prone) is the Gods; and System 2 (slow, conscious, deliberate, reliable) is the World. 

What kind of blew my mind (hey, that's the name of the podcast!) was how these constructs relate to several other metaphysical concepts raised in the series:

System 2 => World, Conscious, Object, Watched
System 1 => Outside, Subconscious, Subject, Watcher
System 0 => No-God, Unconscious, Absolute

In short, the series itself is an allegory of human cognition!  Which is pretty cool. 

A spoilerific thought stemming from this way of imagining the world:

(click to show/hide)

48
General Earwa / Re: TSACast (SA Podcast)
« on: October 03, 2017, 06:05:35 pm »
 ;D

49
Welcome to the Second Apocalypse, Nichamian.

unless we choose to believe Ajokli took over in the Golden Room unbidden I don't see another reading for the 'treaties' line (A Prince of Hell has no one to be making agreements with in Hell if Kellhus is removed from the idea.)

I wish we knew more about Ajokli's relationship with the Outside, and Hell specifically. I know it's poor logic but we can't yet disprove that Ajokli didn't need to assure the Outside or Ciphrang or Gods or whatever that he'd feed souls to the Outside if they let him make his play in Earwa.

Would someone be able to clarify a point for me - Malowebi observes the events that take place in the Golden Room from Kellhus' hip. At one point he thinks he hears a voice speaking to him alone, and he doesn't hear it again. Could Kellhus hear Malowebi, and communicate with him?

Welcome to TSA Nichamian!

It did appear that Kellhus had some kind of telepathic link with Malowebi. I'm unsure why Bakker chose to include it; maybe a hint for later?
Right before he enters the Golden Room, he says "Fear not Iswazi", but I'm not sure if he said it telepathically or aloud.

It seems to be telepathic - or Daimotic, or whichevery.

There's also the later instruction not to look at the Inverse Fire.
I actually need to double check this. I strongly recall the instruction to not look into the Inverse Fire was telepathic. But for some reason I think the conversation before they walk inside the Ark was out loud?

Here's the section where Malo is warned away from the Goad:

Quote
Wonder had him straining at the margins of his vision to decode the flames at first, for in no way could he sense the stain of sorcery in the unnatural burning.
Avert your eyes... a presence instructed.
Whether the voice was his own or belonged to the Aspect-Emperor he did not know, but it bent the arrow of his attention as if it were his own...
Seems like telepathy, maybe a form of Compulsion?

50
Hello! First post so be gentle...

I read and reread the Golden Room many times to try and unpick the ambiguity of Kellhus and Ajokli's relationship. I feel they are analogues of one another - both separate from their 'race', both great decievers and quick to betray, both have crossed into each other's 'realm'.

As stated by Bakker, Ajokli has been involved with Kellhus since the Circumfixion, but Kellhus didn't know it was Ajokli until later ('light of delusion'). Kellhus himself tells Proyas that he has been to Hell. I believe this is literal and that he 'struck treaties' there - unless we choose to believe Ajokli took over in the Golden Room unbidden I don't see another reading for the 'treaties' line (A Prince of Hell has no one to be making agreements with in Hell if Kellhus is removed from the idea.)
I imagine their relationship to be a mirror of Kellhus crossing the Stepe with Cnaiur - trackless/conditioned ground, Cnaiur's constant vigilance against Kellhus - this could be why Kellhus repeats 'there is a head on a pole...'

(I apologise for the stream of consciousnes - I'm typing this on a phone on a train)

Would someone be able to clarify a point for me - Malowebi observes the events that take place in the Golden Room from Kellhus' hip. At one point he thinks he hears a voice speaking to him alone, and he doesn't hear it again. Could Kellhus hear Malowebi, and communicate with him?
 
Many thanks for letting me join, and thank you for all the insights that without which I would be lost while trying to make sense of these novels!

N
Welcome to TSA Nichamian!

It did appear that Kellhus had some kind of telepathic link with Malowebi. I'm unsure why Bakker chose to include it; maybe a hint for later?

51
The No-God / Re: Perspective and answers to open questions
« on: September 29, 2017, 07:22:04 pm »
profgrape had plans to make a thread about some of these considerations... profgrape ;)?
profgrape still has plans... stay tuned...

52
General Earwa / Re: TSACast (SA Podcast)
« on: September 29, 2017, 03:29:37 pm »
I'm obviously in.  But I strongly encourage new folks to join.  Madness is a great moderator and it's a lot of fun, especially when we've a ton of TUC material to discuss!


53
General Earwa / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Celmomian Prophecy
« on: September 27, 2017, 05:59:24 pm »
- Somehow Kellhus and Ajokli were jumping around time memeing from hell, the message was an accident, and also misinterpreted.

That's a cool idea.   H and I had a Quorum chat a while back about how the Outside was effectively a superspace encompassing every instant of the World's existence for all time.  If this is remotely accurate, it wouldn't be surprising that tinkering with the Outside would have unexpected temporal effects on the World.

54
The Unholy Consult / Re: Did Kellhus find Oblivion?
« on: September 27, 2017, 05:26:30 pm »
But Bakker said that Kellhus is dead but not done. So it’s unlikely that he has found oblivion if he’s still a player.

My cheeky "+1 8)" was only because profgrape and I were talking about it off-forum.

I'll plant my flag again at Bakker's quote meaning that Kellhus' machinations aren't yet played out. Kellhus is dead, dead, as far as I'm concerned.

As much as I hate agreeing with Madness, I agree with Madness; Kellhus might be off the board but the Thought is alive and well.

55
The Unholy Consult / Did Kellhus find Oblivion?
« on: September 27, 2017, 03:23:13 pm »
In response to MSJ's question about Kellhus' fate (is he the other Decapitant, in the Outside, etc), Bakker relied with:

Quote
Well, Ajokli can't find him.

This got me thinking about the scene where a Ciphrang encounters a soul-less Nonman.  I interpreted this as confirming that Nonmen could in fact find Oblivion and therefore, avoid damnation.  But while this is interesting in a world-building sense, it bothered me that it didn't seem to have any underlying purpose to the narrative.  After all these years, we know that Bakker is very deliberate about these little tibits. 

What if the reason Ajokli can't find Kellhus is that Kellhus found Oblivion?  Given that he can wield sorcery without leaving a Mark (levitation), it would't be such a stretch to imagine that he'd found a way to hide his soul in the Outside. 

Make no mistake, I would *way* prefer for Kellhus to be stuck in the Decapitant on his salt-statue's waist, or better yet, be in the Decapitant sent to Zeum.  But maybe he just employed a tried-and-true Nonmen method to escape damnation?

56
The No-God / Re: Perspective and answers to open questions
« on: September 25, 2017, 08:59:43 pm »
This is all fine and dandy. But, what will Kellhus do trapped in the head of Malowebi, laying on the floor of the Golden Room? Is the demon Malowebi, who was instructed to return to Kellhus when through with the Zeumi, is on his way back to his Master? How does he get into the GR? Or, will they (CONSULT) simply discard the salted remains of Kellhus? It can work if demon Malowebi makes it back to Kellhus, though.
To be clear, I don't think Kellhus is trapped in Malo's head.  Or at least, I didn't until you mentioned it... ;-)

All joking aside, "dead but not done" is more about Kellhus' plans surviving his death.  Not saying he had it all figured out.  But I think that several of his machinations (Akka/Mimara, for example), have yet to show their true purpose.

57
The No-God / Re: Perspective and answers to open questions
« on: September 25, 2017, 08:21:15 pm »
There's also the issue that Kellhus (or Ajokli) instructs Malowebi not to look into the IF. If Malowebi is irrelevant to Kellhus' (or Ajokli's) plans at that point, why bother to ensure he remains untainted by the Goad?
Good point.  You'd figure that Kellhus has the pick of the litter when it comes to Decapitants.  So the very fact that he chose Malowebi, let alone making sure he wasn't corrupted by the Goad, matters.

To me, it all points to the fact that Kellhus knew he'd fail.  The bit in TUC where he talks about how the very fact of the Gods' blindness means someday, somehow, the Consult wins and the NG walks.  That he didn't know how things would play out wouldn't stop him from having some kind of plan, right?


58
The No-God / Re: Perspective and answers to open questions
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:04:43 pm »
Is it possible Kel saw his doom in that room? Bringing the head as a trojan horse type move, leaving an operative in his wake to finish the job. Why else bring him? Seems like a tight plan to introduce a spy into the room, otherwise why have him? My first read was that was why he brought him, as backup.
Agreed.  While Kellhus' vision was clouded, he always liked to have a lot of pieces in reserve.

At first I thought Malo was along to record what happened; he is the Witness, after all. But once we saw that he couldn't really communicate, that was out.


59
The Unholy Consult / Re: Why Kelmomas?
« on: September 12, 2017, 03:34:13 pm »
Well looking back on Akka's dreams, Nayu is infatuated with Lëva in the same manner that Kel is with Esme. I mean, in the bowels of the Ark, and Nayu only has getting his wife back on his mind. I think those hints are there for a reason.
I had a similar thought, MSJ, about whether there was a parallel between NC:Aulisi and Kel:Esme.  The bit I had trouble reconciling was that the object of NC's obsession, Aulisi, is long-dead by the time he becomes the Subject.  The last thing he does before getting captured, after all, is enthusiastically shag his wife. 

60
The Unholy Consult / Re: Why Kelmomas?
« on: September 11, 2017, 04:41:42 pm »
I thought it was because he's an ensouled being without any identity, a sort of non-entity.  Reminds me of how Bakker described the NG as "a perfectly unconscious God". 

That being said, I've no idea whatsoever why Nau-Cayuti was a suitable Subject.   

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 27