Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - reichorn

Pages: [1] 2
1
Philosophy & Science / Lectures on the Dialectic of Enlightenment
« on: June 06, 2017, 09:59:25 pm »
Hello all!

I decided on a whim to post recordings of an informal course I gave this spring on Adorno and Horkheimer's The Dialectic of Enlightenment.  If anybody's interested, you can find the link to the files here:

https://reichorn.wordpress.com/2017/06/04/lectures-on-the-dialectic-of-enlightenment/

2
Literature / Re: SFF Rec by Academic Philosophers
« on: September 04, 2016, 01:55:46 am »
Thanks for the link.  I didn't know that Schwitzgebel had put this together...

3
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 19, 2016, 11:50:32 pm »
I haven't read anything from you in the past, so you and I haven't done this yet.

Perfect!

I'm not sure I fully understand his motivation to find out what happens next. Topically, it makes sense, why wouldn't you want to find out your fate? But, after thinking on it, since its not his timeline, its not so much as 'him' as it is someone else, and the drive to see that vision to its end seems less compelling...

Interesting point!  I tried to emphasize that Jerome cannot mentally or emotionally distance himself from the other 'timeline,' for it FEELS just as real to him as his own past does.  Your point makes sense, but only from a 'detached' perspective.  The 'lived reality' of the other life is inescapable, no matter that the idea that it's somehow 'real' is, as Ciaran puts it, utter nonsense.

Also, there's the fact, not quite explicitly stated but I hope detectable, that Jerome really WANTS to become a sorcerer -- but not on Elaarist terms, i.e., he is unwilling to let himself be simply handed over to the Irathics.

4
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 16, 2016, 04:41:57 am »
I want to read the rest now :)

That's exactly what I want to hear!

Thanks for reading, Wilshire!  If you have the time or inclination, I'd appreciate any comments, positive or negative.  If not, that's cool too.  I imagine we've been down this road before...

But this draft is the one.  Strangely, I am free of doubt on this point.  I never could have said that before.

This is the one!

6
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 15, 2016, 06:59:36 pm »
EDIT: Where the hell does the expression "betters" come from to mean those better than you?

According to the OED, it goes back to Old English, meaning both "One's superior in a particular sphere, activity, or personal quality" and "A person of higher rank or social station than oneself. In later use chiefly in pl."  It's no surprise that it's so old, and Germanic.

Some examples:

OE   Vainglory (1936) 36   He þa scylde ne wat fæhþe gefremede, feoh [read feoþ] his betran eorl fore æfstum.

c1330  (▸?c1300)    Guy of Warwick (Auch.) l. 1939 (MED),   A gode kniȝt and no coward—Anon to Speyne his better nis.

OE   Battle of Maldon (1942) 276   Eadweard..gylpwordum spræc þæt he nolde fleogan fotmæl landes, ofer bæc bugan, þa his betera leg.

c1275  (▸?a1200)    Laȝamon Brut (Calig.) (1963) l. 1872   For hit was swuþe mouchel scome..þat scholde a quene [sc. Cordelia] beon king in þisse londe & heora sunen beon buten þa weren hire beteren [c1300 Otho betere] of þan aldre sustren.

Yes, I'm a very literal person...

7
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 14, 2016, 11:58:34 pm »
The blog is fine, I just don't like reading on my phone, or a screen at all if I can avoid it. Much better for me to read it on paper.

I've been meaning to say that anyone forum regulars who want .pdf's of my chapters, I'd be happy to send them.  Much easier that way, if you're going to print them out.  Let me know.

8
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 12, 2016, 08:13:15 pm »
Liked it a lot, again. Glad to hear that the previous opening with the sidereas game will be used for Bk2. Just curious if that actually means book 2 in this trilogy/duology, or rather the 2nd section of this first book.

Thanks for reading!  For a long time I imagined Three Roses as a trilogy of door-stoppers.  Last year, or the year before, I decided the story was better off as six reasonably sized books.  So it's a sex-ology?  Awesome.

I do still plan on using the sidereas game as the opening for Book 2, as in the second book of the series.

9
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 12, 2016, 05:43:45 pm »
Tried to read it o my phone but didn't like that media. I'll print it out and read it, hopefully sooner rather than later.

Anyone who's WordPress-savvy and wants to make recommendations for formatting my blog, let me know.  My patience runs out quick when I try to do shit like that...

I'm so astonished how effortless pumping out these different versions is for you, delavagus.

Effortless?  Hah!  That's just an expression of your blindness to the wheels turning behind the screen...

10
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: June 11, 2016, 07:06:50 pm »
You guys must be mightily sick of hearing this, but -- wait for it... -- I scrapped what I had of Three Roses and have begun again, again.  If you have the stomach for yet another dive, take a plunge:

https://reichorn.wordpress.com/sample-chapters/

If you do, I think (= hope) that you'll agree that THIS IS THE ONE GODDAMMIT ALL TO HELL.

I've never been so pleased with how the book is coming together.

11
Literature / Re: Audiobooks
« on: January 17, 2015, 01:37:42 am »
Pronunciation of wacky names and places is sort of aggravating how wrong I've been, for example it is kelus not kellhoose.  That's a huge adjustment, dropping the h sound in kellhus

I had the same reaction -- but from the horse's mouth.  I remember a hungover breakfast with Scott in London when we started talking about the books.  He pronounced Kellhus "Kellus" and I was like, "WTF?!"  Though of course I didn't say anything.

Now I've learned that it's a totally normal way to pronounce that sort of name, but at the time it seemed weird.

12
Literature / Re: Audiobooks
« on: January 17, 2015, 01:29:08 am »
I have come to embrace audiobooks completely -- to a large extent because it's the only reliable way for me to get my fiction fix.  There are good audiobooks and bad, true.  In my own case, though, I find that, with good audiobooks, I go with it, because they're good; and with bad audiobooks, I kind of listen 'through' the narrator, bypassing him/her.

In most cases, though, I find that I end up liking even narrators I didn't originally take to.  Last summer I started the epic project of listening to the entire Wheel of Time series, and at first I didn't like the narrators -- American, when I always prefer English narrators for fantasy, and just not voices I got into at first.  But after umpteen thousand hours of listening, I've come to like them.  The fact that they have a man narrating the male pov sections and a woman narrating the woman pov sections is actually pretty great, even though it introduces all sorts of problem (voices sound different, names are pronounced differently, etc).  All those problems, though, have smoothed out for me, so I hardly notice them and they don't bother me.

Anyway...  Maybe the best narrator I've heard (that I can remember, anyway) is the guy who does Martin's books.  (Well, all except Feast for Crows.)  I forget his name, but he's amazing.  Especially by the second and third books, when he's really hit his stride in terms of voices and characterizations.  For instance, he gave Tyrion a very distinct accent, and at least in later books, he has Jaime speak in a way that is very similar only much less pronounced.  It's quite subtle, if I remember right, yet it was clearly a conscious decision.  Really impressive.

13
Literature / Re: Three Roses, Bk.1 by Roger Eichorn
« on: December 17, 2014, 10:01:34 pm »
Thanks for the boost, Madness, and to everybody who has read, esp. those who have commented.  It's been so great these past few years to know that I can turn to you guys to get a second, or third, or fourth set of eyes on my drafts.

I hope you all get to read the completed book (indeed, the completed series) someday.  I have the whole thing, all six books, outlined, and I'm really excited about it.  (The series used to be broken into three huge books, now it's six reasonably sized ones.)  I think I've got something new, at least in terms of how the story is structured (it spans generations, so it can't afford to fall into the day-to-day-to-day trap one finds in, say, Jordan or Martin).

Anyway, thanks again, everybody.

14
Literature / Re: Patrick Rothfuss
« on: November 30, 2014, 09:18:22 pm »
No.  I'm a bit bemused by how much people seem to like his work.  I read (or, well, listened to) the first book.  I enjoyed it enough that I finished it, but I wasn't impressed, and by the end my interest had faded to nothing.  I've never felt the slightest desire to seek out the second book.

I don't remember (off the top of my head, anyway) enough about the story to be more specific.

15
I haven't watched the seminar, but I wonder if Searle's 'direct realism' is ontological or epistemological.  I think 'direct realism' is a live option *ontologically*, but it's a dead letter epistemologically.

Pages: [1] 2