I think you've broadened the notion, Mike - at the start I said I was focusing on sexual predation. In terms of something like, say, men being promoted ahead of equally qualified (or better!) women at work, I'd agree to a notion of male privilege (though given I think this is wrong, again I'm tempted to say it's something else, a bad thing. I prefer to keep privilege as a good notion - all of us rely on privileges of various types every single day of our lives)
Though I think the 'unwanted compliments' is problematic. Oh I know what is being refered to - but it also has it's own sort of 'you aught to be able to read my mind or your a bad person' hypocracy. Of course we mock victorian etiquette, but it was precisely set up to enact rules for this sort of situation? If a woman (who has consumed and reproduced the idea of 'unwanted compliments') (or a man, for that matter) who looks exactly the same to any eye in A: and B:, but in A: she accepts the compliment and in B: she reacts with a nasty condemnation, that's really just bullshit. How the hell can anyone tell those things apart? It's just encouraging someone to be an unpredictable landmine.
You'd think there could be a social contract sort of thing in culture where there are certain beginner compliments that are generally accepted - very light ones and non judgemental. The other person can decline the compliment (thus blocking any further, more elaborate stage of compliment), but not think the other person is bad for giving one without asking (because they used the very faint compliments).
Otherwise it's just a movement pushing women to consume the idea that if they find the person handsome, they can accept it, but if they find the person ugly, they can treat that person as a bad person for giving the very same compliment.
No, that's not good enough. Unless we want to encourage people acting like children.