Where do you feel I lost you? Happy to provide links if there's anything that needs clarification, or even attempt to use my own words.
Well, unfortunately, I fear I am lost in the whole thing. In the sense that all my googling and reading articles fails to operationalize exactly what it is you are aiming at.
For example, I can't fashion just what the idea of hyperchaos is. The following deinition leaves me less clear than before I read it: "…the notion of Hyper-Chaos is the idea of a time so completely liberated from metaphysical necessity that nothing constrains it: neither becoming, nor the substratum. This hyper-chaotic time is able to create and destroy even becoming, producing without reason fixity or movement, repetition or creation." I might just not be smart enough to be able to grasp the idea.
I can follow the idea of Transcendental Universals, like math and logic, as things real but not physically existent, however then I am lost again how that relates to Aquinas, as such.
I don't have a definitive proposal in bringing up Math & Logic, just that while it doesn't seem beyond my imagination to consider Hyper Chaos (with reservation) I can't help but feel Universals from which we derive math & logic are more than mere artifacts/tools arising by sheer luck from the formless, lawless matter.
I could, however, see the existence of the Universals acting as lodestones bringing Order to Chaos. However none of this has good metaphysical reasoning, just a passing fancy I was thinking about that may have a nugget of something worthwhile.
That's true, I certainly didn't reason them out in the least bit. Mainly because I barely even understand what we are discussing, haha. Although, perhaps it is hard to say that math, for example, is transcendental, when it could, plausibly, be the case that it exists only in our minds? Or maybe not though. I think my brain-meter might run out in this depth...