Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Cüréthañ

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 52
31
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 19, 2017, 06:45:30 am »
I'll try and clarify my position for you Yellow.

Well, sorcery alters Creation, yes? The God is responsible for reality, sorcery changes that reality according to the desire of the sorcerer, whether it's the Psukhe or not. There's plenty of ways to get damned without causing the Mark, why should the Psukhe be exempt?

Chorae destroy the Mark, and yet the Aporetics who made them defected to the Consult.

Aside from Kellhus' cryptic reference to the Psukhe using different leverage to produce sorcerous effects, I see no real reason to axiomatically conclude Cish aren't damned simply because they don't produce a Mark. And given that sorcery of all stripes is primarily used to murder and destroy at the whim of the user, I can't get behind the idea.

Chorae are used to banish Ciphrang in Shimeh, but that could be because the demon's avatars might be a product of Daimotic magic. On the other hand, I think Yatwer seemed pretty comfortable with Chorae even seemingly manifesting one from nowhere when the first WLW tries to kill Kellhus, but Mimara's tricks with them might be another matter.

32
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 19, 2017, 12:35:22 am »
Bakker answered this in the AMA and the Q&A thread. Nau-Cayuti and Kelmomas have the same brain structure as the original insertant (who was lost during Arkfall).

Well, I read through both of those and must've missed that.

Perhaps this is what you mean?

Quote
Quote
Quote from: H on July 29, 2017, 06:57:10 am
I don't have a question prepared on short notice, so the first thing that comes to mind is to ask about Ark.  It was my presumption that the No-God apparatus (the sarcophagus) functioned differently before Ark-fall.  My supposition would be then that while Ark was fully functional, the souls of the Progenitors would have been contained therein, meaning that on other worlds, it would have been unnecessary to find a suitable surrogate.  Of course, the presumption then would be that what makes a soul a suitable alternative is not specifically Anisûrimbor blood, but rather similarity to the Progenitors.  Could this be an accurate summation?


Plug and play, basically. Having lost the original store of circuits, the Consult had no choice but to keep rummaging through the heap the World provided. The Anasurimbor, for whatever reason, have proven apt historically.

Doesn't seem that cut and dried to me.

33
The Unholy Consult / Re: The Mysunsai and the Red Ghoul
« on: August 19, 2017, 12:06:37 am »
A good example of Bakker's writing at it's murkiest. Like, this didn't need to be so confusing.

34
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 19, 2017, 12:02:51 am »
Wouldn't it have to have existed? The Dunyain acknowledge the No-God is necessary for shutting the Outside
For them, in their current situation. It doesn't necessarily mean that it was so before, when the Ark was operational.
Perhaps. I think the question remains one way or another, what unique aspect of even Nau-Cayuti, allowed him (and later Kelmomas) to become the No-God where those thrown in for over a thousand years were insufficient. I can buy the idea that Ark served the function of the No-God and they didn't have one before. But it still doesn't answer what about Nau-Cayuti worked.

+1.  Those other victims were surely brutalized in the same way as Nau Cayuti.

In the interest of provoking more discussion it might be worth noting that the only confirmation of the Mutilated's assertion that it was NC in NoGod1.0 is Akka's dream. We still don't have the vaguest clue where that information comes from ... and we know that they have contradicted themselves before - when Anaxophus did not use the Heron Spear ... and so the DreamsFromTheSheath may not be trustworthy. No idea where to take this train of thought from here, but...

Celmomas has got a lot more similarities with his (K) namesake, twinsouled, dead-brother, direct lineage. Perhaps he is the key here.

35
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 18, 2017, 11:48:07 pm »
My take was that the Mark is a result of imperfection. When recalling the God through meaning and language, the wielder's recollection is imperfect and therefore can be distinguished from the work of the God.

The Psukhe, in the other hand, is the result of the wielder *feeling* as the God, and these emotions are the thing itself, not representations of the thing. Therefore not imperfect. Therefore no Mark.

So how does that work when a Cish delivers Water, or walks in the sky, or sends dreams? 

Creation as is stands would be a perfect recollection, but the Psukhe destroys and alters creation itself no less than other forms of sorcery. Thus it is also countered by the contradictions of Chorae.

The difference seems rooted in the method of invocation, not the 'perfection' of the effect - other sorcerers use semantics to change reality whereas the Cish use passionate belief. For me, it is pretty clear that they are using different tools to the same effect.

36
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 18, 2017, 08:54:43 am »
Huh, well maybe he changed his mind since writing and disseminating that timeline with the rape of Omandelia. Maybe he's just being contradictory to evoke mystery.

Kelmomas is certainly and odd kid, but we have no similar peculiarities hinted about about Nau-Cayuti or Kellhus. Of course, the Consult tortured the heck out of Nau Cayuti for five long years before they decided to chuck him in the carapace, they never thought there was anything that special about him. Yet the Mutilated talk like it's fairly obvious that Nau Cayuti was the appropriate Subject and seem to have based their strategy on using Kellhus as the proper replacement. Were the Gods blind to Nau Cayuti? Maybe. Are they blind to Kellhus? Nah.

I guess I can see maybe three similarities between these three Subjects that we could say have been sufficiently foreshadowed.
1) They are Anasurimbor and Ancestor Lists are Very Important.
2) They are all genetic prodigies and/or mad.
3) They represent the hope of their peoples. (Yeah this one is pretty weak)

The other option is to accept that the Mutilated based their strategy on the Celmomman prophecy showing Kellhus as the Harbinger. Which seems pretty dumb tbh, seeing as Kelmomas isn't in it.

Aside:  Isn't it also weird that it's the C and K's in the glossary that get switched up. Then we have (C)elmomas and (K)elmomas. 2spooky Bakker!

37
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC spoilers] The visions - Not Ajokli?
« on: August 18, 2017, 04:35:18 am »
Koringhus muses on the Anasûrimbor as the most promising of the 12 'germs'. The dunyain clearly are practicing an Earwan form of eugenics, and seemingly focus on the paternal line of descent.

The most important thing here, I think, is that the Anasûrimbor line has the rare distinction of both Halaroi and Ishroi ancestors, thus intersecting the two ensouled races on Earwa.

38
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers] The Loose Ends
« on: August 17, 2017, 07:10:42 am »
@Khaine, agree on the Sarcophagus, but I also concede it might have to do with Mimara and her use of Chorae via the Eye. The Consult seem to have info on her that the reader lacks (referring to Aurax talking to Skinspy in TGO)

@Cynical Cat, +1. Somewhat ironic that the magic the Hundred employ (WLW, godspit and Psatma leap to mind) also leaves no Mark.

As an aside, perhaps it is simply that sorcery leaves a Mark only when the sorcerer uses language. I believe Gnostic and Anagogic schools both use dead languages for the Uterals - that's a pretty strong link to a lot of  dead and dawned souls really.

39
The Unholy Consult / Re: The Collected Works of Emilidis
« on: August 16, 2017, 08:32:42 pm »
Has it been noted that Akka identifies Chipmunk as the Artisan's work when he sees Crabicus touching it with a chorae, sparking light but not disenchanting it?

40
The Unholy Consult / Re: The next time you come before me
« on: August 16, 2017, 02:32:21 am »
Akka stays true to himself. Holds vital info about the NG, says nothing.

Kellhus trying to justify his ends.

I was looking forward to this scene but the plot gags their conversation pretty hard imo.

41
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]What was the point
« on: August 15, 2017, 12:00:29 pm »
At least, there weren't any that Ajencis knew of when he wrote. It's also possible that Eärwa's star system just doesn't have that many planets. Personally I always felt that everything pointed to the universe outside of Eärwa's planet being much the same as ours.
He implies comparing different charts. Spotting planets is a pretty elementary part of astronomy.

Idk, physics works pretty differently on Earwa with dragons and shit. Maybe Bakker's universe has warps and spacewhales and planets-that-are-gods floating around in the void.

And then there's the question of where the nonmen really came from. I doubt it really affects anything plotwise anyway, just shading the margins, haha

42
The Unholy Consult / Re: [TUC Spoilers]What was the point
« on: August 13, 2017, 08:17:53 pm »
From the very first mention in the book, I've always read the Nail of Heaven to be an equivalent of the Polestar/ Polaris, the way it's used in navigation.

Yes, but the variation of its light intensity before the crush of the Ark implies some relation.

Is it a portal/wormhole? Is it an inchoroi spacial station?
I'm slowly becoming convinced that Earwan astrophysics are as different from our own as the metaphysics.

The speculation from Ajencis on the origin of the Ark really pushes this, because it reveals that there are no other visible celestial bodies in the sky besides the stars and moon. And yet, the Ark was damaged by the 'shoals'. Whatever they might be...

43
The Unholy Consult / Re: Why would the Inchoroi fear damnation?
« on: August 07, 2017, 01:10:51 am »
I merely tried to clarify my point.

You don't get it, that's fine, we'll leave it there.

edit: at any rate, it's not about Inchoroi dumb - Kellhus smart. Simply that there are important things made clear to the reader that contradict the Inchoroi perspective. Kellhus was plenty wrong too and died for it.




44
The Unholy Consult / Re: Why would the Inchoroi fear damnation?
« on: August 07, 2017, 12:48:16 am »
The non-men who were exposed believe oblivion is a lie, but we have seen that even erratic can attain it.
Since that's the only one we've ever seen manage it, for all we know only an erratic could attain it.

I honestly don't think we have enough information here to answer why the Inchoroi aren't ciphrang.
You are missing the point. The mechanics of avoiding damnation are not important.

We know the Inverse Fire is a tool of control. It's a compelling truth, but not the whole truth. Any Dunyain knows the value of partial truths in conditioning via deception.

The Inchoroi are conditioned to believe there is only one way to save their souls because of that. Extermination.

We know that Oblivion is an option. They deny that.

We know that Redemption can come from the one God or the Hundred. They say EVERYONE is damned forever.

We know you can level up your soul. They aren't interested.

Logical induction dictates being careful with immortality means not dying means no damnation. They would rather render themselves extinct trying to shut the world.

Maybe exterminating everyone and erasing history will work to save their souls, maybe they are doing it to free the progenitors from Hell, or maybe the progenitors just want to terraform planets.

Point is, their mission is focused to one goal only, the Inverse Fire is there to keep them on track.

Happily for them, the Dunyain want to do the same thing in pursuit of a Self Moving Soul. The Inverse Fire is barely required to get them to join according to Kellhus PoV in TTT.




45
The Unholy Consult / Re: Why would the Inchoroi fear damnation?
« on: August 06, 2017, 09:10:16 pm »
It seems pretty clear that the inverse fire reveals only certain facts of individual damnation.

The JE shows both examination and redemption exist, even for shitbags like Galian.

The non-men who were exposed believe oblivion is a lie, but we have seen that even erratic can attain it.

The IF is a tool to goad it's victims, intended to enslave rather than enlighten.

Same logic would apply for ascension as Ciphrang. The progenitors who created the Ark clearly only wanted those who serve the Inverse Fire to seek one nihilistic goal, not to consider other options.

Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 52