The Second Apocalypse

Earwa => The Aspect-Emperor => The Great Ordeal => Topic started by: Francis Buck on January 03, 2017, 03:19:51 pm

Title: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 03, 2017, 03:19:51 pm
CRACKIN' POTS: (This post actually started in the "Meppa's Role" thread, but it ended up becoming huge and sort of a different topic, so I made a new thread for it -- I may get around to talking about how the hell I think Meppa actually fits into this...some day).

Moenghus was and still is, in some capacity, actually helping Kellhus achieve his "destiny"...whatever that may be, as glimpsed by Moenghus and seemingly grasped by Kellhus. After all, practically the whole of PoN is a story of Kellhus gradually realizing that the World has been conditioned by his father, and while Kellhus is certainly aware of this, he nonetheless behaves as if he has, well, free will for lack of a better word (this arguably becomes blurry after the Umiaki Miracle).

Really, though, I think a great deal of the confusion comes from a misunderstanding of what the Psukhe is, what the Water is, what the intended meaning of Passion is, and most of all what a soul is. Near the beginning of TGO, when Achamian has the dream of Shauriatas (which we've had access to from the original first excerpt, back in 2013) he mentions the complexity of souls for a good reason:

Quote
“But souls are exceedingly complicated,” he continued. “Far more so than the crude sorceries used to trap them. The intricacies of identity are always sheared away. Memory. Faculty. Character. These are cast into the pit... Only the most base urges survive in proxies.”

There's an undeniable influence of Gnostic Christian myth & theology in the series (particularly when it comes to a lot of the subtleties in Earwa's metaphysics), and one glance at a Gnostic "diagram of a soul/spirit" should give an idea that complexity:

(http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_mistic/gnosismontalk_02.jpg)

I'm not going to even try puzzling all that out with exact metaphysical analogues from TSA, in part simply because I'm not inclined to believe the metaphysics are fully analogous, but it is a jumping point of sorts.

Getting more to the point, I think a clarification of a few central topics may elucidate some facets of this discussion (or what may be clarifications in my own opinion, anyhow).

The Distinction between Soul & Spirit
This is more or less straight from Gnostic thought, but it appears in plenty of other belief systems in various forms. In common parlance, these words often used interchangeably, but with the metaphysics of Earwa, I think the defining the two notions is key to understanding, well, all sorts of shit in the series.

Basically, the Soul is akin to an exotic form of matter (or energy) which acts as the substrate for the Spirit. What Achamian describes as "the intricacies of identity" -- memory, faculty, character -- are in fact the Spirit of an individual. The things that make you, me, and Napoleon different people.

Souls, on the other hand, are not only identical but are actually the same thing from the same source (again, not unlike the way that all of our own brains are ultimately just made of atoms that once came from stars, etc.). It's useful to think of souls in the singular. Consciousness is encoded in the substrate of matter. Spirits are written on the substrate of Soul.

The Water is Soul, the primordial "sea" from which all Soul originated and, eventually, returned to.

Better yet, just think about the Force from Star Wars. The majority of people that die in Star Wars just...die, like regular humans. But in the case of "great sorcerors" like Obi-Wan, Yoda, Anakin, they are able to retain some remnant of their Spirit (identity) even after death, because reasons.

(Also, don't get too attached to the exact phrasing I'm using here because I'm pretty sure things are, as always, a bit more complicated. I'm just going for the main jist of my point here).

So, given all of the above, we can reassess the nature of the Psukhe, a school of sorcery that relies solely on passion. For the sake of expediency, and I will now rattle off a list of my current interpretations of what's going on in a way that may sound like it's totally supported by textual evidence, or as if I think I actually know precisely what's going on. The former is debatable, and the latter is hilariously untrue.

-The Cishaurim, through the art of the Pskuhe and ritualistic blinding, work to strip themselves of a "Self" (identity, spirit) and open their Third Eye (the Heart, seat of the Soul), a conduit to the primordial sea of Souls, called the Water.

-Because the Cishaurim have no Self/Spirit/Identity (or at least a very stunted one), they are also invisible to the gods -- also, by weaponizing pure Soul for their sorcery, it leaves no Mark on World.

-In addition (or alternatively), The God(s?) are blind to the Cishaurim, because by removing their eyes (Windows to the Soul), they've broken the Circuit of Watcher and Watched. It should also be noted that at least one of the reasons the Cishaurim use snakes as their symbiotic sensory apparatus is because snakes traditionally have very poor version, instead relying on taste/scent and thermal detection. This supports the relevance of the Circuit of Watcher and Watched --  the implication is that snakes are chosen deliberately because they do not rely on optical senses. After all, if you're going to use an animal surrogate for lost vision, why wouldn't you use something that's actually better at seeing? Like birds for example...

-The text is deliberately misguiding about the Psukhe and true the extent of the Cishaurim's abilities (or any one else who can tap into the Water for that matter -- I don't believe it's exclusive to the Cish). What the Psukhe lacks in raw power it makes up for in subtly, illusion, scrying, dreamwalking, etc. Because of the employment of a traditional, western concept of the Male Gaze through which the series is (mostly) told, and from the patriarchal society of the Three Seas, the Psukhe is disregarded as inferior, and Cishaurim as abominations so "Other" that barely anyone even tries to understand them. This is, of course, just about the worst possible way to approach the Cish, an institution that's seemingly founded on techniques of subterfuge, misinformation, and working as invisibly as possible. Like a spy organization...


- Contrary to first impressions, the Cishaurim are actually an ideal fit for a Dunyain. The text implies that because of the Dunyain’s “stunted emotions”, the Psukhe was a poor choice for Moenghus. But this is misguided, since as we know, the “passion” that drives the Psukhe is actually the most base parts of the Soul -- which are not so much stunted by the Dunyain as mastered by them.



Conclusion

The climactic confrontation between Kellhus and Moenghus in TTT can be thought of as akin to the scene in The Empire Strikes Back, when Luke is training on Dagobah and ventures down into the cavern. At first, he seems to find Vader down there, confronts him, and defeats him, only for it to be revealed that it was himself all along.

It’s been theorized many times that what makes Kellhus special is that he doesn’t just read faces -- he reads souls. This is why the people that contend with him are broken/enlightened based entirely on truths about themselves.

When Moenghus blinded himself, he sheared away his spirit, his identity -- the things which made him different from Kellhus -- thereby becoming a kind of reflecting pool for his son. This is why the conversation between two is so hotly debated and interpretive.

Kellhus is quite literally having a conversation with himself. He went down into the Nonman Mansion to do precisely what Nonmen do -- reflect upon himself.

And because Moenghus had made a mirror of himself for Kellhus, it allowed Kellhus the opportunity to glimpse the Darkness that Comes Before him, which is very well symbolized when Cnaiur and Serwe approach from behind moments before he uses the Cant of Transposition.


Bonus:
The Scylvendi’s swazond are, in fact, an example of what Achamian calls “the crude sorceries used to trap” souls. This is part of what makes Cnaiur so powerful and age-defying. By capturing the raw soul of his victims, he actually makes his own soul stronger.




Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 03, 2017, 05:09:28 pm
Damn son!  This is going to take me weeks to unpack.  Let me start small:

-The text is deliberately misguiding about the Psukhe and true the extent of the Cishaurim's abilities (or any one else who can tap into the Water -- I don't believe it's exclusive to the Cish). What the Psukhe lacks in raw power it makes up for in subtly, illusion, scrying, dreamwalking. Because of the employment of a traditional, western concept of the Male Gaze through which the series is (mostly) told, and from the patriarchal society of the Three Seas, the Psukhe is disregarded as inferior abominations so "Other" that barely anyone even tries to understand. This is, of course, just about the worst possible way to approach to the Cish, an institution that's seemingly founded on techniques of subterfuge, misinformation, and working as invisibly as possible. Like a spy organization...

I think at another level, and Bakker alluded to this "problem" about why the Psukhe remained "unknown" for so long with a quote that "to someone with a hammer, every problem is a nail", is the same reason why European philosophy never encountered it's own ilk outside the Eurosphere.  That is to say that once European thought placed the utmost import on "Reason" and formal "Logic" the road of anything else was functionally closed.

I had a college profession many years ago, who had lived in Tanzania for a number of years, she would tell us that African minds had thousands of years worth of a more "lived" philosophy that didn't place any premium on logic or reason and so was instantly discredited by Western minds as "primitive."  (I assume she wasn't totally bullshiting us, even if she might have embellished at points.) So the same with the Gnosis, I would imagine.  Once the Nonmen walked down the path to place formal structure paramount, via language, the path of non-ligustic, or intuitive, passion driven work was essentially cut off.

I think this goes toward your further point, of why a Dunyain and the Psukhe seem to not jive.  Dunyain place the Logos (a form of logic) above all and so, cut themselves off from the font of the Psukhe's power.  It isn't that passion is missing, per se, but rather the whole formulation of problem solving is fundamentally opposed to the method of the Psukhe.

I need to marinate on these things more...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 03, 2017, 06:17:13 pm
not going to comment on Moenghus and his puskhe power

Passion, being a base instinct, makes sense that it would be part of 'the legion within' that all Dunyain must yoke to survive in Ishual. That it could then later be wielded rather than closed off is a great idea.

Spirit/Soul.
Interesting thoughts. I'm not sure I fully agree with your interpretation of what's what, but that they are discrete things is also a helpful way to view Earwa. Nomenclature is important, and this helps me parse things (I think?).

Question, that the gods are blind to the Cish themselves, rather than just their sorcery, is an assumption, yeah? There's no text that says that right? Not that the absence makes you wrong, just wanting to be sure.
Anyway, that's also a great rabbit hole. Lots of implications, I think, if you consider that the Cish are a blindspot of the God(s), just like the consult's weapon races. Intellects without souls (tekne creation), and Souls without Spirits (puskhari). Maybe, then, the God(s) are blind to things without a Spirit, rather than souls, aka, sranc don't have a 'self'(Spirit), so they are incomprehensible and therefore invisible.
Though, that makes me wonder, the NG possessing all the sranc.... something. Another time.

Great post :)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 03, 2017, 06:28:22 pm
Anyway, that's also a great rabbit hole. Lots of implications, I think, if you consider that the Cish are a blindspot of the God(s), just like the consult's weapon races. Intellects without souls (tekne creation), and Souls without Spirits (puskhari). Maybe, then, the God(s) are blind to things without a Spirit, rather than souls, aka, sranc don't have a 'self'(Spirit), so they are incomprehensible and therefore invisible.

IIRC, all we know is that they are not Marked as a result of the Water.  We don't actually know if the gods see them or not.  My guess is they do see it, but there is no difference between changes exacted by the gods and changes by the Water.  No discrepancy means no Mark, I would imagine.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 03, 2017, 06:54:29 pm
Yeah but that dead horse has been beaten enough. This is new and shiny :)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 03, 2017, 07:57:07 pm
not going to comment on Moenghus and his puskhe power

Passion, being a base instinct, makes sense that it would be part of 'the legion within' that all Dunyain must yoke to survive in Ishual. That it could then later be wielded rather than closed off is a great idea.

Spirit/Soul.
Interesting thoughts. I'm not sure I fully agree with your interpretation of what's what, but that they are discrete things is also a helpful way to view Earwa. Nomenclature is important, and this helps me parse things (I think?).

As per souls/spirits, I should also further clarify my...attempt at clarification. RSB doesn't seem to use that actual distinction of verbiage in the text, as "soul" seems to be the go-to phrasing. However, the metaphysical system I described there is something that I think is definitely at play.

The phrasing used in the series which I think can be seen is in Kellhus's talks with Proyas throughout TAE, and the way he refers to the Lesser Proyas and the Greater Proyas. Again, I think it's all a bit more complicated than I'm making it out to be (mostly just because RSB's creating his own system here, and not duplicating an existing one wholesale), but this also helps explain what goes down between Proyas and Saubon.

The Lesser Proyas (the Worldly incarnation of Proyas) is weak, which makes the Greater Proyas (the Spiritual part) strong. This is reversed in the case Saubon. A massive, nearly all-encompassing theme/motif of the series is "inversion". Everything's flipped upside down and turned inside out. It permeates every aspect of the series, from metaphysics, to worldbuilding, even down to names (surname first, given name second).

Saubon's error is seeing Kellhus as the embodiment power. Saubon believes that strength while living is all-important, and further more, he is precisely described as being incapable of truly worshiping or submitting to another man. This makes Saubon strong on the outside, but weak on the inside.

Upon death, one is "turned inside out"...so in the Outside all that Worldly strength is useless, because the inner-self is what gets exposed.

Proyas is the opposite. Suffering, doubt, self-hatred, self-loathing -- these make you truly strong. Being broken to such an extent you cannot be broken anymore.

Of course, all of this inverting/subverting works specifically because the series is written with a traditional, Western, Judeo-Christian (ideally male and heterosexual) perspective in mind.

Question, that the gods are blind to the Cish themselves, rather than just their sorcery, is an assumption, yeah? There's no text that says that right? Not that the absence makes you wrong, just wanting to be sure.
Anyway, that's also a great rabbit hole. Lots of implications, I think, if you consider that the Cish are a blindspot of the God(s), just like the consult's weapon races. Intellects without souls (tekne creation), and Souls without Spirits (puskhari). Maybe, then, the God(s) are blind to things without a Spirit, rather than souls, aka, sranc don't have a 'self'(Spirit), so they are incomprehensible and therefore invisible.
Though, that makes me wonder, the NG possessing all the sranc.... something. Another time.

I don't believe there is any specific textual evidence for the Gods being blind to the Cishaurm, that's just some idle speculation on my part (in fact it wasn't even something I thought of before writing this post, though I think there may be something to it).

Regarding your thoughts on the weapon races, I believe that is definitely the right track. I also think that the weapon races have been deliberately set up as a way of twisting the reader's expectations down the road, particularly regarding the Skin-Spies, but even Sranc and Bashrag. I have no clue how it will play out exactly of course, but I feel pretty strongly that idea of the Tekne creations being mere soulless husks will be flipped on its head and used as an example to show reader's that, functionally, there is no real difference between consciousness as experienced by a human and consciousness as experienced by a Skin-Spy, other than programming (and anatomy, I guess). Both are equally subject the Darkness that Comes Before, and humans possess no substantially greater level of "freedom" compared to the Skin-Spies. In fact, one could say the Skin-Spies are even more liberated than humans. Sure, they're yoked to the Inchoroi's commands by promise of sexual release, but then...look at Cnaiur and the Thing-Called-Serwe in TGO. Who seems more free in that dynamic? Who's playing who?

Same goes for Kellhus's dominion over just about everyone. He simply has more tools at his disposal. Swap Proyas's religious piety for sexual release, and he's just as much a puppet for Kellhus as the Skin-Spies are for Aurang...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 03, 2017, 08:13:32 pm
I've recently had some introspection with consciousness after reading Peter Watt's Blindsight. I'd have to say that consciousness is so vaguely /poorly understood that it certainly seems to me that when looking at a human and a skinspy or other weapon race, the functional difference between them is nil.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Monkhound on January 03, 2017, 09:27:30 pm
The Lesser Proyas (the Worldly incarnation of Proyas) is weak, which makes the Greater Proyas (the Spiritual part) strong. This is reversed in the case Saubon. A massive, nearly all-encompassing theme/motif of the series is "inversion". Everything's flipped upside down and turned inside out. It permeates every aspect of the series, from metaphysics, to worldbuilding, even down to names (surname first, given name second).

Saubon's error is seeing Kellhus as the embodiment power. Saubon believes that strength while living is all-important, and further more, he is precisely described as being incapable of truly worshiping or submitting to another man. This makes Saubon strong on the outside, but weak on the inside.

Upon death, one is "turned inside out"...so in the Outside all that Worldly strength is useless, because the inner-self is what gets exposed.

Proyas is the opposite. Suffering, doubt, self-hatred, self-loathing -- these make you truly strong. Being broken to such an extent you cannot be broken anymore.

Of course, all of this inverting/subverting works specifically because the series is written with a traditional, Western, Judeo-Christian (ideally male and heterosexual) perspective in mind.

The comparison of Saubon with Proyas you just made is, in my opinion,valid.
I somehow started looking for such parallels-going-antithesis the moment I read Saubon's death at Dagliash. The hint of Saubon seeing himself at Mengedda is an obvious hint that all the pieces on the board are in place and that the final scheme has just been set into motion (almost litteraly by Kellhus pushing the typical "Red Button").
The nuke at Dagliash creates (or reïnforces? Although I don't think the death of the Nonmen and the Diurnal there created one) a topos, a link to the Outside. The way we see it through the eyes of Saubon, I read a connection between the topoi at Mengedda and the one at Dagliash.

At the same time, we have a few parallels of severe underground trauma during the whole series:
*The death of Moenghus at the hand of his son Kellhus: I found your analysis above, very interesting and it obviously got me thinking.
*The death of Oinaral at the hand of his father Oirunas
Both deaths happen at the bottom of a Nonman mansion, in both cases, Knowledge (capital K) is at stake... If I push that further, it might even be the recovery of Memory (capital M), or the grasping of the plan, or of what is at stake.

And:
*The wight under Cil-Aujas: The scene is that of a haunted Nonman, which ends in a big explosion of something at the bottom of the Great Medial Screw
*The detonation of the nuke at Dagliash: The detonation happens at the top of the Well of Viri, basically a chimney pipe into the mountain
The detonation in Cil-Aujas is described more as an echo than as a genuine explosion

I'm inclined to believe that these events, just like Dagliash and Mengedda, are connected through Kellhus and TTT.

(click to show/hide)

Quote from: The No-Mod
Regarding your thoughts on the weapon races, I believe that is definitely the right track. I also think that the weapon races have been deliberately set up as a way of twisting the reader's expectations down the road, particularly regarding the Skin-Spies, but even Sranc and Bashrag. I have no clue how it will play out exactly of course, but I feel pretty strongly that idea of the Tekne creations being mere soulless husks will be flipped on its head and used as an example to show reader's that, functionally, there is no real difference between consciousness as experienced by a human and consciousness as experienced by a Skin-Spy, other than programming (and anatomy, I guess). Both are equally subject the Darkness that Comes Before, and humans possess no substantially greater level of "freedom" compared to the Skin-Spies. In fact, one could say the Skin-Spies are even more liberated than humans. Sure, they're yoked to the Inchoroi's commands by promise of sexual release, but then...look at Cnaiur and the Thing-Called-Serwe in TGO. Who seems more free in that dynamic? Who's playing who?

Same goes for Kellhus's dominion over just about everyone. He simply has more tools at his disposal. Swap Proyas's religious piety for sexual release, and he's just as much a puppet for Kellhus as the Skin-Spies are for Aurang...

I was thinking the same: Kellhus basically commands TGO as the No-God commands the Sranc.

Since the eyes as the window the the Soul was mentioned earlier, there is a passage in the Dagliash scene where Kellhus warns everybody to run away, in which the choice of words intrigued me:

Quote from: The Great Ordeal, hardcover p.376, Bold and Italics are in the book
Flee Dagliash! his voice boomed. Across the Erengaw and the root of the Urokkas, the combatants looked up and wondered.
Flee! Hide yourself from its sight!
It's specifically the last sentence, turned as if Dagliash could see/witness.
I know it's a relatively common turn of phrase, but still: It's not usually about a location.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 03, 2017, 09:30:33 pm
From Koringhus, TGO

Quote
And so it was with the Absolute. Surrender. Forfeiture . Loss … At last he understood what made these things holy. Loss was advantage. Blindness was insight, revelation . At last he could see it—the sideways step that gave lie to Logos. Zero. Zero made One.

I liken this to what you say on the Greater and Lesser Proyas and the Lesser (wordly) being weak, ignorant to the truth. Mimara also says something along the same lines in TJE (i believe). What makes you holy is being blind, ignorant and weak. Along with other things both Koringhus and Mimara mention.

ETA: does Mimara ever look on Som with the judging eye? Seems not. But, that would be interesting to see if it's mentioned. Som is definitely around when the Eye opens. If Skin-Spies had souls don't you think that would be mentioned? I think it's the exact reason Mimara knew Som was not a man. I don't buy the idea of products of the Techne having a soul. That goes against what the Consult is trying to do to begin with.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 03, 2017, 09:53:51 pm
@Monkhound

Quote
The nuke at Dagliash creates (or reïnforces? Although I don't think the death of the Nonmen and the Diurnal there created one) a topos, a link to the Outside. The way we see it through the eyes of Saubon, I read a connection between the topoi at Mengedda and the one at Dagliash.

Dagliash was a Topoi long before the Nuke. The link between Saubon and the Outside was established on the fields of Mengedda, the largest Topos a in Earwa. His feat was just a revelation of the moment. Having Dagliash being A Topos in and of itself probably didn't hinder the connection. I can agree on that.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Monkhound on January 03, 2017, 09:57:04 pm
Nice catch: A variant on "The meak shall inherit the earth", then?

If my memory serves, she recognizes Somma as a Skin-Spy only when she sees him fight to protect her. I can't remember her seeing him under TJE.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 03, 2017, 10:13:58 pm
Nice catch: A variant on "The meak shall inherit the earth", then?

If my memory serves, she recognizes Somma as a Skin-Spy only when she sees him fight to protect her. I can't remember her seeing him under TJE.

I'd like to go back and read and see if we can pick up any subtle clues. She does remark in Cil-Aujus that he is not a man. So, I think through her training from Kellhus she picked up on that. But, more than anything I go back to Canuir's with the SS's during TTT. We find a lot out about their nature in those moments. And, nothing textually points to them having souls. Maybe, a twist, but I find it supremely unlikely. They used the Skin-Spies, Hashtag and other creations to help in reducing the population of Earwa, ergo the amount of souls. There is said to be At and beyond number, that would hinder reducing the amount of souls in Earwa. And if souls are what are needed to resurrect the No-God, a concept I am coming around to, why not just use the countless Skin-Spies to fulfill that role? Nah, all signs to point to product of the Texhne NOT having souls.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 03, 2017, 10:18:41 pm
Nice catch: A variant on "The meak shall inherit the earth", then?

If my memory serves, she recognizes Somma as a Skin-Spy only when she sees him fight to protect her. I can't remember her seeing him under TJE.

Yea, I'd say. Remember what makes Sorweel the perfect canidate for Yatwer is his ignorance. I've quoted all the evidence for this in numerous threads. This is why I feel that his revelations with the Nonman will awaken him, therefore turning him away from Yatwer. That's my reading. Though it could still be he is the one to kill Kellhus, of me simply put of his hatred for killing his father. I find it unlikely though, because the last we see him, his love for Serwa is shining through and I believe he will find that she may love him also.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 03, 2017, 10:22:42 pm
Quote
Bonus: The Scylvendi’s swazond are, in fact, an example of what Achamian calls “the crude sorceries used to trap” souls. This is part of what makes Cnaiur so powerful and age-defying. By capturing the raw soul of his victims, he actually makes his own soul stronger.

I love this and give meaning to Moenghus asking and say I u he needed Cnauirs strength. Great observation.

ETA: sorry, I'm very incapable of multi-quoting, hence the 35 posts. But, I'm very excited to see some activity on the board and some great conversation here.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 03, 2017, 10:25:04 pm
Nice catch: A variant on "The meak shall inherit the earth", then?

If my memory serves, she recognizes Somma as a Skin-Spy only when she sees him fight to protect her. I can't remember her seeing him under TJE.

I'd like to go back and read and see if we can pick up any subtle clues. She does remark in Cil-Aujus that he is not a man. So, I think through her training from Kellhus she picked up on that. But, more than anything I go back to Canuir's with the SS's during TTT. We find a lot out about their nature in those moments. And, nothing textually points to them having souls. Maybe, a twist, but I find it supremely unlikely. They used the Skin-Spies, Hashtag and other creations to help in reducing the population of Earwa, ergo the amount of souls. There is said to be At and beyond number, that would hinder reducing the amount of souls in Earwa. And if souls are what are needed to resurrect the No-God, a concept I am coming around to, why not just use the countless Skin-Spies to fulfill that role? Nah, all signs to point to product of the Texhne NOT having souls.

Or perhaps they simply do not have souls yet, which in the timeless Outside would mean they do in fact have souls, and only appear to be void from the limited perspective of a mortal...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 03, 2017, 10:38:15 pm
Interesting, FB. I Wil say this. We will we throw loop after loop in TUC. I will keep this in mind and send you riches worthy of a top notch theorist. Lol :)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 05, 2017, 05:55:13 pm
Or perhaps they simply do not have souls yet, which in the timeless Outside would mean they do in fact have souls, and only appear to be void from the limited perspective of a mortal...

If they all ended up gaining souls though, that would kind of make the whole Inchoroi plan sort of dumb in the end.  Unless Kellhus someone ensouls them all, which seems kind of out there, but maybe possible, although I have no idea why he would.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 06, 2017, 05:29:15 am
Or perhaps they simply do not have souls yet, which in the timeless Outside would mean they do in fact have souls, and only appear to be void from the limited perspective of a mortal...

If they all ended up gaining souls though, that would kind of make the whole Inchoroi plan sort of dumb in the end.  Unless Kellhus someone ensouls them all, which seems kind of out there, but maybe possible, although I have no idea why he would.

Think of it this way -- we basically know that Cnaiur is going to be a Ciphrang when he dies, as RSB confirmed it in our own Q&A. We already know that the Outside is atemporal, though it can appear to change from the perspective of its own eternal inhabitants, even the Gods themselves, as seen with Kellhus and Yatwer.

So, was Cnaiur always a Ciphrang in the Outside? If that's true, then it's possible one of the Ciphrang we've seen already is, or was, a character we know from the story. Not to mention the technique Kellhus used to create the Malowebi-Ciphrang possession. Kosoter is almost certainly another example -- which means there were more than two Ciphrang that Kellhus collected (I have a hope that Kellhus's ventures into the Outside are a bit like the Harrowing of Hell, mixed with the Hindu(?) deity that releases a storm of "demons" from their palm/third eye).
 

Of course this could still go in a different direction at some point (I haven't noticed the author straight up lie about a particular detail in an interview/Q&A, but he certainly tells half or partial truths -- we still really have no idea what an "angelic ciphrang" is for example).

Basically, if a human can turn into something so wildly inhuman as a Ciphrang, I don't see why any of the other lifeforms (including seemingly "soulless" creatures...in the eyes of so-called Gods that don't even realize the No-God is a threat, even when it's actively decimating huge swaths of Earwa).

This is all a bit of a tangent, but since it deals with understanding the Outside and the timeless aspect of Earwa's cosmology (so far as we can tell at this stage) then it can seems useful.

I'm also playing devil's advocate somewhat with the sranc or other soulless being becoming automatically ensouled or something in the Outside. However, I do think that the story is using its own genre as a way of tricking otherwise savvy readers of SF into missing common themes. The skin-spies, in particular, are just robots made of meat (like humans). Unlike say, the aliens from Blindsight by Peter Watts as Wilshire mentioned, which are presented literally as creatures without any sentient experience (OR ARE THEY?), multiple skin-spies have a POV perspective that is humanlike, if not beyond human, but with the integrated programming limitation of an insatiable sexual desire to serve their overlords. Even a sranc has POV in WLW when Somandutta appears before it, which is basically portrayed as a rightfully confused animal that senses what seems like typical normal prey (human), but is off just enough so that it doesn't know what to make of it.

TL;DR What makes a Skin-Spy different from Asimov's robots and their three laws? The Weapon Races (aside from Dragons perhaps) are quite literally artificial intelligence
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 06, 2017, 12:53:56 pm
I'm also playing devil's advocate somewhat with the sranc or other soulless being becoming automatically ensouled or something in the Outside. However, I do think that the story is using its own genre as a way of tricking otherwise savvy readers of SF into missing common themes. The skin-spies, in particular, are just robots made of meat (like humans). Unlike say, the aliens from Blindsight by Peter Watts as Wilshire mentioned, which are presented literally as creatures without any sentient experience (OR ARE THEY?), multiple skin-spies have a POV perspective that is humanlike, if not beyond human, but with the integrated programming limitation of an insatiable sexual desire to serve their overlords. Even a sranc has POV in WLW when Somandutta appears before it, which is basically portrayed as a rightfully confused animal that senses what seems like typical normal prey (human), but is off just enough so that it doesn't know what to make of it.

TL;DR What makes a Skin-Spy different from Asimov's robots and their three laws? The Weapon Races (aside from Dragons perhaps) are quite literally artificial intelligence

While I understand where you come from, Sranc or Bashrangs aren't really "artificial" any more than a common dog is.  While Sranc didn't occur outside of Inchoroi designs, neither did a Greyhound dog appear outside of human design.  While we would ascribe a certain artificiality to Sranc they are simply something of "de-evolved Nonmen" which is really perfectly "natural" albeit as natural as any other genetically modified organism.  Which is to say that "natural" is a pretty meaningless term once fully unpacked.

I can't follow that a spin-spy is a robot.  It is simply a sentient animal.  It just lacks a soul.  Same with Sranc and Bashrag.  They aren't AI because their intelligence is "natural" that is, simply a debased version of a Nonman, in the same way that a dog's intelligence is a heightened version of a wolf's.  In another real-life example, we don't make robot sheep that are subservient to us, we just breed out any signs of heightened awareness or intelligence.  In the same way, Sranc were probably "made" by either breeding out, or using the Bios to delete, the higher cognitive abilities of Nonmen.  A Scranc's brutality isn't coded, per se, it is simply what's left after higher functionality is removed.

A skin-spy is a little different, but I don't think it is literally coded, in the same way that a robot would be.  I think the "issues" we see with skin-spies are more due to their limited capacity in having no souls, rathan than a limitation of coding.  Indeed, I think skin-spies can act "outside of the box" as Soma seems to do with Mimara, where he changes the mission based on what he thinks Aurang wants.  Sure that could be some sophisticated neural network sort of shit, but considering how limited the Tekne is at the time when skin-spies seem to come to be, I can't imagine that their minds are much more than warped human brains.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 06, 2017, 02:32:52 pm
Love the turn this thread is taking :)

TL;DR What makes a Skin-Spy different from Asimov's robots and their three laws? The Weapon Races (aside from Dragons perhaps) are quite literally artificial intelligence
Which is to say that "natural" is a pretty meaningless term once fully unpacked.
Yup. In nearly all cases I cringe when people discuss 'natural' . Its either in reference to something that's explicitly supernatural, ie coming from some sort of metaphysical deity, or totally meaningless as to what distinguishes it from whatever unnatural counterpart.

I can't follow that a spin-spy is a robot.  It is simply a sentient animal. 
There is no difference between a sentient robot and a sentient animal, except the hardware maybe. I

In the case of skinspies, I presume they have flesh and tissue brains and/or synapses and nerves, making even that no longer an available cop-out.

So, robots/AI/skinspies are indistinguishable from sentient animals. From humans. Well, except the whole soul thing.

It just lacks a soul. 
Right :)

Same with Sranc and Bashrag.  They aren't AI because their intelligence is "natural", that is, simply a debased version of a Nonman
They are an intelligence created using technology. Not sure how you get more Artificial than that. But, as I mentioned initially, 'natural'?

Do you mean anything 'natural' must have been created by Ciphrang/Gods/Gods/Zero-God/Solitary God/[insert whatever metaphysical supernatural being ends up being correct]? If so, then any of the derived are unnatural/artificial.

Or does a 'natural' process have to arise from random change? ie Evolution? If so, sranc must be unnatural/artificial in that they were created systematically by the Inchoroi.

, in the same way that a dog's intelligence is a heightened version of a wolf's. 
Quick aside, I'm pretty sure in this analogy the Wolf is the Nonman, the Dog Sranc. Similarly, dogs are dumbed down versions of wolves - if there is in fact any functional way to measure the intelligence of either (dogs/wolves I mean. I'm sure you could get a sranc and a Nonman to take an IQ test ;) )

In another real-life example, we don't make robot sheep that are subservient to us, we just breed out any signs of heightened awareness or intelligence.  In the same way, Sranc were probably "made" by either breeding out, or using the Bios to delete, the higher cognitive abilities of Nonmen.  A Scranc's brutality isn't coded, per se, it is simply what's left after higher functionality is removed.
What's the difference between the two things you described - selective breeding or using the Bios to delete, and coding?
I don't see any difference. In either case, you are purposefully creating a set of instruction that are hard wired into the electronic bearing circuitry of the thing - be it a positronic brain or a wet brain. In either case you have neurons or circuits that fire in the pattern that you prefer, and don't fire in a way you don't prefer.

Organic tissues and DNA are no different from inorganic metals, organic wires (remember, organic refers to just about anything with Carbon in it, as long as it doesn't have any of the listed 'inorganic' atoms), and computer code.

A skin-spy is a little different, but I don't think it is literally coded, in the same way that a robot would be.  I think the "issues" we see with skin-spies are more due to their limited capacity in having no souls, rather than than a limitation of coding.  Indeed, I think skin-spies can act "outside of the box" as Soma seems to do with Mimara, where he changes the mission based on what he thinks Aurang wants.  Sure that could be some sophisticated neural network sort of shit, but considering how limited the Tekne is at the time when skin-spies seem to come to be, I can't imagine that their minds are much more than warped human brains.
The amount of understanding you'd have to have to create even a simulacrum of a mind in a functioning, artificially created, organic body capable of complex thoughts and reasoning, would be pretty immense. Skinspies are sophisticated as fuck. Call it selective evolution or organic-coding, I don't see any difference.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 06, 2017, 03:33:26 pm
Kellhus and Moe met outside the view of the eyes of the gods?

The whole point of the mansions seems to be to hide from the gods.



Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 06, 2017, 03:41:41 pm
The amount of understanding you'd have to have to create even a simulacrum of a mind in a functioning, artificially created, organic body capable of complex thoughts and reasoning, would be pretty immense. Skinspies are sophisticated as fuck. Call it selective evolution or organic-coding, I don't see any difference.

Indeed, this is kind of why I don't think the skin-spies are akin to robots.  It seems implausible (to me) that skin-spies were made from scratch.  Instead they are simply modified humans/whatever, that have been made for a focused purpose.  To me, that is a difference between what I would call a robot (wholly built) and a bred (or forcibly evolved) being.  We are definitely getting into some Westworld-esque shit here and I'm not sure I am articulate why I see a difference.

Perhaps I can use another poor dog analogy:

I wouldn't consider a rat terrier a robot, even though they were bred to hurt and kill rats.  They were just bred for an explicit purpose.  And so I would consider a skin-spy the same way.  The foundation of a skin-spies is already something preexisting (which is why I used "natural" in quotes) and is simply modified/bred for a different purpose.

There is no difference between a sentient robot and a sentient animal, except the hardware maybe.

I would tend to disagree, in the sense that there is both a hardware and software difference.  Unless we can discover that biological brains literally run on code, there is a definite difference between what we could call AI now-a-days and a biological mind.  Now, plausibly in the future a machine mind could fully emulate a biological one, but in the end, there is still some difference, however fleeting.  Is it a meaningful difference, by way of experience of the subject?  I don't know.  I only have a biological mind and could never know fully what a machine coded one would be like.

They are an intelligence created using technology. Not sure how you get more Artificial than that. But, as I mentioned initially, 'natural'?

Do you mean anything 'natural' must have been created by Ciphrang/Gods/Gods/Zero-God/Solitary God/[insert whatever metaphysical supernatural being ends up being correct]? If so, then any of the derived are unnatural/artificial.

Or does a 'natural' process have to arise from random change? ie Evolution? If so, sranc must be unnatural/artificial in that they were created systematically by the Inchoroi.

But the thing is, I don't think they created that intelligence themselves, simply corrupted/debased/repurposed an already existent one.  Like I said, the word "natural" is highly problematic and all I meant by it here was "already preexistant" without Inchoroi input.  Sranc certainly are artificial in the sense that they were designed, but that doesn't mean they are robots.  My point was a Sranc is artificial just as a dog is.  I don't think we want to take the leap that dogs are robots, right?

Quick aside, I'm pretty sure in this analogy the Wolf is the Nonman, the Dog Sranc. Similarly, dogs are dumbed down versions of wolves - if there is in fact any functional way to measure the intelligence of either (dogs/wolves I mean. I'm sure you could get a sranc and a Nonman to take an IQ test ;) )

That was just a shitty analogy by me, haha.  Really I meant it more as dogs would simply be different version of wolves though.

What's the difference between the two things you described - selective breeding or using the Bios to delete, and coding?
I don't see any difference. In either case, you are purposefully creating a set of instruction that are hard wired into the electronic bearing circuitry of the thing - be it a positronic brain or a wet brain. In either case you have neurons or circuits that fire in the pattern that you prefer, and don't fire in a way you don't prefer.

Organic tissues and DNA are no different from inorganic metals, organic wires (remember, organic refers to just about anything with Carbon in it, as long as it doesn't have any of the listed 'inorganic' atoms), and computer code.

If the artificial mind functioned the same way as a brain, that is, it was literally a 1:1 copy of an organic brain, then I think we have a valid questioning of "what is the difference, really?"

However, if you had a brain that functioned like computers do now, relying on binary code, I think the distinction is meaningful, even if in a indeterminate way.  Indeed, for all the advance AI we have now, it is usually pretty clear when output comes from an AI or from a real biological brain.

However, I don't think this is what the Bios/Tekne/Inchoroi are doing though.  I think they just take things preexistant and modify them for different aims.  Like what humans did to make dogs of wolves.  I hesitate in this case to call what you end up with a robot, even if it is at your beck-and-call.  Dogs often are subservient to humans, yet, again, I don't think we would consider dogs robots.  I don't see Sranc or even skin-spies outside that kind of logic, even if they are far more advanced (another problematic word, perhaps I should avoid) than dogs.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 06, 2017, 03:42:45 pm
Kellhus and Moe met outside the view of the eyes of the gods?

The whole point of the mansions seems to be to hide from the gods.

Good point.  Perhaps that is part of TTT though, hiding it from the gods as well?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 06, 2017, 05:40:28 pm
Well, first, what is sentience? What is consciousness? Unanswered, and currently afaik, unanswerable.

A computer is basically clumps of circuits firing through logic gates that are either On or Off, you called it binary code. The brain is the same thing. Clumps of neuron that are either firing or not, ie binary. Same thing imo. Code tells the circuits how/where to fire, whether its a person that write the code or macromolecules making up DNA.

Artificial Intelligence and Intelligence are functionally indistinguishable at the level of electricity. The thing carrying the current should be irrelevant.

And, yes, I'm saying there is no difference between a rat terrier a robot in terms of thinking capacity. There's research into making organic computers, and research into making computers sentient. It goes both ways. The differences are superficial. Its all just atoms and electricity.

We're working from pretty different fundamental frames of mind. I don't think there will be much reconciliation here. But, if there is to be, we should focus on a smaller scope lol.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 06, 2017, 05:52:10 pm
And, yes, I'm saying there is no difference between a rat terrier a robot in terms of thinking capacity. There's research into making organic computers, and research into making computers sentient. It goes both ways. The differences are superficial. Its all just atoms and electricity.

We're working from pretty different fundamental frames of mind. I don't think there will be much reconciliation here. But, if there is to be, we should focus on a smaller scope lol.

At that point though, every living thing is a robot, so what is the point of distinction?

All the humans, all the Inchoroi and all the Nonmen are, so all the Sranc, Bashrags and Skin-Spies are, as are all the animals, every one of these are robots, exacting some biological code.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 06, 2017, 06:59:13 pm
Kellhus and Moe met outside the view of the eyes of the gods?

The whole point of the mansions seems to be to hide from the gods.

Good point.  Perhaps that is part of TTT though, hiding it from the gods as well?

Also the place where Inri ascended to heaven. If one believes the entry in the glossary.

Well the whole series could be called the TTT, the series starts with Moe enacting it, although as he said he was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to him. PoN is everyone walking the TTT as is TAE.

The TTT came to Moe out of the darkness as well.

I'm back into full Moe is behind everything mode.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 06, 2017, 10:48:53 pm
And, yes, I'm saying there is no difference between a rat terrier a robot in terms of thinking capacity. There's research into making organic computers, and research into making computers sentient. It goes both ways. The differences are superficial. Its all just atoms and electricity.

We're working from pretty different fundamental frames of mind. I don't think there will be much reconciliation here. But, if there is to be, we should focus on a smaller scope lol.

At that point though, every living thing is a robot, so what is the point of distinction?

That is, basically (in a loopy way that barely even makes sense to myself), the point I was trying to make. There is no real meaningful difference between any of these creatures, except that "some of them lack a soul", which I feel is going be to another implanted reader quasi-bias that gets turned on its head.

And let's not forget the apparent anomaly that was Simas the ensouled skin-spy. Kellhus (or Maithanet, can't remember) calls it an anomaly right off the bat, but in reality they couldn't possibly know if that's true, unless they're both part of the Consult which seems unlikely (for now). Even so, we'd have to assume it still a deliberate deception. Perhaps skin-spies and other Weapon Races are intentionally created without souls because a soul (as defined by whatever that means by Earwa's standards are) is basically just a big flashing light for denizens of the Outside. Maybe it's even a bad thing.

Ultimately, I really think we are underestimating how many steps ahead of everyone the Consult may be (possibly excluding Kellhus or Mimara, mayhaps). I don't think the Ark is going to be a ruin that's barely held together by a couple of borderline Alzheimer's victims and an incorporeal suprasoul thing, or whatever the fuck Shauriatas is. This is simply what they (and the author) want everyone (characters and readers) to think. Not unlike the Cishaurim's perception in the first trilogy. Or maybe not and we'll never really know.

ETA:
Not super relevant here, but I was going to add that I think there's a pretty good possibility of some internecine conflict within the Consult. The two Horns may hold two different factions of the Consult, if not in direct opposition then at least not in total unison (something along the lines of Sauron and Saruman, what with the two towers and all).
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 07, 2017, 02:12:04 am
Kellhus and Moe met outside the view of the eyes of the gods?

The whole point of the mansions seems to be to hide from the gods.

Good point.  Perhaps that is part of TTT though, hiding it from the gods as well?

Also the place where Inri ascended to heaven. If one believes the entry in the glossary.

Well the whole series could be called the TTT, the series starts with Moe enacting it, although as he said he was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to him. PoN is everyone walking the TTT as is TAE.

The TTT came to Moe out of the darkness as well.

I'm back into full Moe is behind everything mode.

But, The Torturer tried to create a blind spot to the gods........in a Mansion.....it didn't work.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 07, 2017, 02:15:20 am
Well, first, what is sentience? What is consciousness? Unanswered, and currently afaik, unanswerable.

A computer is basically clumps of circuits firing through logic gates that are either On or Off, you called it binary code. The brain is the same thing. Clumps of neuron that are either firing or not, ie binary. Same thing imo. Code tells the circuits how/where to fire, whether its a person that write the code or macromolecules making up DNA.

Artificial Intelligence and Intelligence are functionally indistinguishable at the level of electricity. The thing carrying the current should be irrelevant.

And, yes, I'm saying there is no difference between a rat terrier a robot in terms of thinking capacity. There's research into making organic computers, and research into making computers sentient. It goes both ways. The differences are superficial. Its all just atoms and electricity.

We're working from pretty different fundamental frames of mind. I don't think there will be much reconciliation here. But, if there is to be, we should focus on a smaller scope lol.

This is why I love this place. These little nuggets of interesting info I'd otherwise never know anything about. Science....love that shit. I just suck at it. 😎
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 07, 2017, 03:42:39 am
Kellhus and Moe met outside the view of the eyes of the gods?

The whole point of the mansions seems to be to hide from the gods.

Good point.  Perhaps that is part of TTT though, hiding it from the gods as well?

Also the place where Inri ascended to heaven. If one believes the entry in the glossary.

Well the whole series could be called the TTT, the series starts with Moe enacting it, although as he said he was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to him. PoN is everyone walking the TTT as is TAE.

The TTT came to Moe out of the darkness as well.

I'm back into full Moe is behind everything mode.

But, The Torturer tried to create a blind spot to the gods........in a Mansion.....it didn't work.

Cause they took Sorweel there. Also Sorweel himself notes in the depths he went to a place the goddess couldn't see.

They were bid to dig into mountains in their earliest stories. The Torturer is just continuing this practice not initiating it.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 07, 2017, 11:04:56 am
Kellhus and Moe met outside the view of the eyes of the gods?

The whole point of the mansions seems to be to hide from the gods.

Good point.  Perhaps that is part of TTT though, hiding it from the gods as well?

Also the place where Inri ascended to heaven. If one believes the entry in the glossary.

Well the whole series could be called the TTT, the series starts with Moe enacting it, although as he said he was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to him. PoN is everyone walking the TTT as is TAE.

The TTT came to Moe out of the darkness as well.

I'm back into full Moe is behind everything mode.

But, The Torturer tried to create a blind spot to the gods........in a Mansion.....it didn't work.

Cause they took Sorweel there. Also Sorweel himself notes in the depths he went to a place the goddess couldn't see.

They were bid to dig into mountains in their earliest stories. The Torturer is just continuing this practice not initiating it.

Yea, I get that. But, his little torture room didn't hide him from the gods. And, he nearly shits his pants when he realizes it.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 07, 2017, 02:37:55 pm
Ishterebinth was outsmarted the moment they let Sorweel inside their mansion, I think. Sorweel is, in some fashion, similar to Psatma in that they are a form of Oracle, though the mechanism is different. The Torturer's reaction is just the most profound because his sins are so extreme; millenia of sadism and horror supposedly hidden, only to be found by the Gods and damned anyway. This is also true to some degree for whoever else was "seen" by Sorweel, before they realized their mistake and slapped the Amiolas on him. By which time they were already God-Entangled (and always were because the Gods exist in the eternal Outside).

Note that at least two birds are mentioned during this section, specifically after Sorweel gets the Amiolas: one is trapped in the chutes where where he first wakes up, and then later during his descent with Lastborn on the Haul, into the Holy Deep where the boatman, the Most Ancient Warrior, is singing songs and tossing pork. As the Haul is being lowered, a bird (implied to be a Stork, a.k.a. Yatwer's favorite spy). So, either Yatwer got desperate when Sorweel's perspective was fucked with by the Amiolas and sent in the birds to compensate OR the birds (having had literally thousands and thousands of years to get in there) have long since spotted the Nonmen and the Amiolas was just a way for Kellhus to get Yatwer's blessed face off of Sorweel when Oirunas "rips him in half", I.E. removing the Amiolas (Kellhus "killing two birds with one stone?). Seemingly, the blessing from Porsparian that put Yatwer's loving "face" over Sorweel's was also removed. This lines up with how Serwa perceives him as a warrior when he and Oirunas finally crash the party/gangrape going on upstairs.

I'm not sure how to parse the difference between the metaphysical connections to a God regarding characters like Sorweel, Porsparian, Psatma, and the White-Luck Warrior. I think Psatma's seemingly exponential growth in power (mainly after the reward of youth and foresight after lifelong sacrifice) is akin to Cnaiur's partial transformation into a Ciphrang despite still being a live. Cnaiur, much like Psatma, spend their entire lives devoted to their respective -- and interestingly, opposite -- deities, those being Yatwer (Birth/Life/Creation) and Gilgaol (War/Death/Destruction).

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 07, 2017, 07:05:49 pm
And, yes, I'm saying there is no difference between a rat terrier a robot in terms of thinking capacity. There's research into making organic computers, and research into making computers sentient. It goes both ways. The differences are superficial. Its all just atoms and electricity.

We're working from pretty different fundamental frames of mind. I don't think there will be much reconciliation here. But, if there is to be, we should focus on a smaller scope lol.

At that point though, every living thing is a robot, so what is the point of distinction?

All the humans, all the Inchoroi and all the Nonmen are, so all the Sranc, Bashrags and Skin-Spies are, as are all the animals, every one of these are robots, exacting some biological code.

Yes. The  point is that there is not a distinction.

Oh, looks like FB followed that up for me already ;).


H, you seem to dislike that idea - the lack of difference. What makes it important? I think imposing a difference allows people to justify actions to things, animals, other people. Slavery/holocost/genocide are super examples. The industrial meat industry another (mmmm The Meat. I still eat it) . When things are different, its super easy to justify action. So, I think remove the distinction between 'us' and 'them' is a good thing. Maybe not?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 09, 2017, 01:40:41 pm
Yes. The  point is that there is not a distinction.

Oh, looks like FB followed that up for me already ;).


H, you seem to dislike that idea - the lack of difference. What makes it important? I think imposing a difference allows people to justify actions to things, animals, other people. Slavery/holocost/genocide are super examples. The industrial meat industry another (mmmm The Meat. I still eat it) . When things are different, its super easy to justify action. So, I think remove the distinction between 'us' and 'them' is a good thing. Maybe not?

Making a new thread, so as to not dereail the real point of this thread further: in PHil & Science (http://www.second-apocalypse.com/index.php?topic=2078.0).

TL;DR: If we deign to call a dog a robot, then every living thing a robot, then the term robot seems to literally have to meaning any more.  Indeed, on Earwa, we can point to the lack of soul as a differentiation, but again, the purpose seems to get lost along the way.  Sranc are really no different that animals in the grand scheme of things, only one arose through a (seemingly) non-conscious evolution and other other by a conscious hand.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 09, 2017, 02:17:00 pm
I've now read my copy of TTT into about 5 pieces and i have 5 pages missing.

We have Moe picking the depths of a non-man mansion which is also named as a site where people can ascend to heaven. We know non-men mansions were built originally to hide from the gods. We know the Dunyain are damned.

We have Kellhus assertion that Moe is weak in the water. however the setting in which we meet him has overwhelming amounts of actual water, in fact it might be a water slide park with bronze slides.

Kellhus doesn't walk straight to his father he wanders down some halls "heeding a voice from nowhere" yet the torch his father left for him at the entrance sputters dead just far enough along his trail/trial for him to see the braziers that Moe set out for him. If Kellhus had spent a bit longer wandering he might have missed the lights till later.

Kellhus is described as inadvertently kicking a skull when he is describing his fathers journey. The author put it there for a reason.

Moe's eye sockets seem to weep still.

The Cish Kellhus beheads in TWP during the siege of Carkasand looks just like Kellhus and Moe, so much so, Kellhus thinks it's his dad till he gets face to face with him.

Just listing some of the things that make me go "hmmmmm i know jackshit but maybe..."
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 09, 2017, 03:18:16 pm
We have Moe picking the depths of a non-man mansion which is also named as a site where people can ascend to heaven. We know non-men mansions were built originally to hide from the gods. We know the Dunyain are damned.

Or so we think he ascended in to heaven.  I do wonder what the hell really happened though.  It's definitely no coincidence though, considering the Nonman-Ishual-Kayudea connection.

We have Kellhus assertion that Moe is weak in the water. however the setting in which we meet him has overwhelming amounts of actual water, in fact it might be a water slide park with bronze slides.

Yeah, the water-Water parallel has always felt salient, despite Kellhus assertion that Moe is weak.  Weak certainly is a relative term though and while we can doubt the Moe would be Meppa-level with the Psuhke, that doesn't mean he was really all that weak, in my mind.

Kellhus doesn't walk straight to his father he wanders down some halls "heeding a voice from nowhere" yet the torch his father left for him at the entrance sputters dead just far enough along his trail/trial for him to see the braziers that Moe set out for him. If Kellhus had spent a bit longer wandering he might have missed the lights till later.

This could be another sign as to how conditioned Kellhus' path is.  The torch would burn just long enough to guide him down the path that Moe knew he would walk.

Kellhus is described as inadvertently kicking a skull when he is describing his fathers journey. The author put it there for a reason.

A foreshadowing of Moe's death?

Moe's eye sockets seem to weep still.

This one is really rather mysterious.  So, either he wasn't blind before, or for some reason he was further gouging out his own eyes?  Neither would seem to really make sense though.

The Cish Kellhus beheads in TWP during the siege of Carkasand looks just like Kellhus and Moe, so much so, Kellhus thinks it's his dad till he gets face to face with him.

I do wonder if this was some doing of the Psuhke, like Moe does when in front of the Emperor, or is it something more, like a delusion of Kellhus?

Just listing some of the things that make me go "hmmmmm i know jackshit but maybe..."

After all these years and we're still not sure about so much...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 10, 2017, 07:34:03 pm
"heeding a voice from nowhere" sounds like The Legion Within to me. Maybe an indication that Kellhus is broken, ie no longer in control of the Darkness that comes before? It also, given the no-god dreams, could be more of whatever that is.

Skull foreshadowing Moes death I like. Certainly isn't foreshadowing Kellhus' death. In any case I try to not get sucked too far into Chekhov's Armory (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChekhovsArmoury).

Weeping Eyes. Maybe its some kind of Stigmata that all Cishaurim bear. We know at least 1 god that is real, why not Indara, and why not stigmata.

Ah, I choose to believe that the beheaded one was another half-brother of Kellhus. One of the six sons of Moenghus.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 10, 2017, 08:27:08 pm
"heeding a voice from nowhere" sounds like The Legion Within to me. Maybe an indication that Kellhus is broken, ie no longer in control of the Darkness that comes before? It also, given the no-god dreams, could be more of whatever that is.

But TGO does imply that the voice could be his own.  At least, that is nearly the linchpin of my crackpot theory.

Skull foreshadowing Moes death I like. Certainly isn't foreshadowing Kellhus' death. In any case I try to not get sucked too far into Chekhov's Armory (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChekhovsArmoury).

One thing that I always come back to is how Conditioned the ground Kellhus walks on in this scene is?  As themerchant points out, the torch running out at the exact right moment is plausible to read as: when Kellhus' light is out, so Moe's burns.  That is, the ground that Kellhus then walks on is Conditioned.  But the skull, was that Moe's doing?  Or something else?  The same something that placed Leweth to save Kellhus?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 10, 2017, 08:40:23 pm
With the lights, yes it was a close call, but if your holding a torch, you can't see much beyond it. He'd have to be real close to a smoldering brazier whilst holding a lit torch before he could actually see it. Up until that point, it would always seem like the torch went out just before he came upon another light source.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 10, 2017, 08:43:39 pm
With the lights, yes it was a close call, but if your holding a torch, you can't see much beyond it. He'd have to be real close to a smoldering brazier whilst holding a lit torch before he could actually see it. Up until that point, it would always seem like the torch went out just before he came upon another light source.

True, it's hard to distinguish between true happenstance and true Conditioning, which is part of what makes that scene harder to really pin down.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 11, 2017, 10:31:57 am
With the lights, yes it was a close call, but if your holding a torch, you can't see much beyond it. He'd have to be real close to a smoldering brazier whilst holding a lit torch before he could actually see it. Up until that point, it would always seem like the torch went out just before he came upon another light source.

The problem with this interpretation is the light is described as "the faintest of glimmers".
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 11, 2017, 02:10:49 pm
The problem with this interpretation is the light is described as "the faintest of glimmers".

I find it highly likely that the torch lasting only just long enough is both a thematic point as well as a clue as to how Conditioned the encounter is.

I think where the Conditioning unravels is where Moe says how "I have searched, for nearly the length of your entire life, and I have found nothing that contradicts the Principle [of Before and After]."  Kellhus, even at the time, has a hunch this is incorrect (part of why I find credence in the theory that TTT is actually from the future or is atemporal) and we know, based on later revelations (and Bakker's own assertions) that the Principle is false, in so far as it is not the whole of causality.  It can explain some, but not all of what happens.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 11, 2017, 03:22:16 pm
This is a circular conversation from this point forward.

Someone points out that what Moenghus said is objectively wrong, then someone else claims that this was only because Moe was lying and that he secretly knew the truth.
Or the reverse, and Kellhus says something wrong, but wait no this was a lie, etc.

If anyone figures out a way around this, let me know :) .

With the lights, yes it was a close call, but if your holding a torch, you can't see much beyond it. He'd have to be real close to a smoldering brazier whilst holding a lit torch before he could actually see it. Up until that point, it would always seem like the torch went out just before he came upon another light source.

The problem with this interpretation is the light is described as "the faintest of glimmers".

His eyes would have been adjusted to the light source. When it goes out, they need to re-adjust.
Easy to test: When its dark out, turn the lights on in a room, and place a dim night light in the corner. Read for a half hour. Turn lights off. Note the brightness of said dim night-light before and immediately after you turn the lights off. In an hour, look at the dim light again, and note the brightness. Same bulb, same objective brightness level, different perceived strength. You might even say, right when the lights go out, that it was 'the faintest glimmer' if you could even see it, on the second check, you might describe it as enough to light the whole room.

Also, if Kellhus was following a meandering path following some unknown voice in his head (lets call it Madness), how did Moe plan the exact period of time he would take to see his light? If it was madness, it couldn't have been accounted for, because Moe discounted that possibility (if you think Moenghus lied about that, we're done here). If it wasn't madness, it was Moe's voice, and its not so much conditioned ground Kellhus was on, but more like he was being led by the hand. In either case, its not a feat of super intellectual calculation. Its either pure luck, a perception issue regarding light sources and their intensity, or Moenghus telling him where to go.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 12, 2017, 08:40:09 am
I take the skull to mean Kellhus made a mistake  when running through his assumptions/deductions of what Moe had been up to in the past.

The torch going out "at the right time" to indicate how conditioned the ground is, who it is conditioned by is up for debate, ostensibly it's Moe.

However i believe that the Thousand fold thought is just a chronology of the cause and effect that pushes the setting to some already determined conclusion. The Dunyain perceive it as oppose to conceive it "when the first of the thought came to my i was quite unprepared". They just start enacting it, unaware that it comes from the Darkness before them.

Like Benjuka: there are no actual moves (everything is deterministic) just a changing of the Rules and the Pieces. So my thought is Kellhus is trying to effect a change of rules or pieces that breaks the deterministic cycle.  How he goes about that I have no clue :)

"The cunning of benjuka lay in the absence of this fixed framework. Rather than providing an immutable
ground, the rules of benjuka were yet another move within the game, yet another piece to be played. And this
made benjuka the very image of life, a game of baffling complexities and near-poetic subtleties. Other games
could be chronicled as shifting patterns of pieces and number-stick results, but benjuka gave rise to histories,
and whatever possessed history possessed the very structure of the world."


Each game gives rise to a history.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 12, 2017, 12:41:50 pm
However i believe that the Thousand fold thought is just a chronology of the cause and effect that pushes the setting to some already determined conclusion.

The books seem to point to cause and effect as both true and yet not the whole story.  Just as Moe's assertion (whether he is lying, misleading, or just wrong) the Principle of Before and After is in fact false on Earwa.  This leads me to believe that TTT is beyond Before and After, which would make sense of why Yatwer and company are outmaneuvered by it.  I've presented the crackpot before that what they see is in fact the chain of cause and effect, so Kellhus being outside that means he moves beyond what they really can see.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 12, 2017, 01:04:48 pm
I think TTT is just an extension of the probability trance. Just based on before/after. Though, I don't think the outcome of TTT is set. There's room for divergence still, but it takes a titanic effort - like say the usurpation of an entire world...

Put pretty sure thats beyond the scope of this topic.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 12, 2017, 01:45:09 pm
I think TTT is just an extension of the probability trance. Just based on before/after. Though, I don't think the outcome of TTT is set. There's room for divergence still, but it takes a titanic effort - like say the usurpation of an entire world...

Put pretty sure thats beyond the scope of this topic.

Well, presumably the Thousandfold Thought is what lead to Moe calling Kellhus to him, so in understanding the confrontation between them, I think understanding what the Thought really is would actually be key.  In fact, not just key but The Key.

For example, if The Thought is really just an extended Probability Trance, then we could surmise that Moe's failing was to not prepare for the slim margin that Kellhus ended up walking.  Of course, that's elementary, naturally Moe had to "play the odds" and so he ended up failing as a result of a highly improbable outcome, so it is hard to fault him here.

However, if the Thought really is external, that is, it's source is actually beyond Moe, then there are a host of other implications here.  One, what is the source?  Two, what is it's aim and is it different than Moe's stated intentions?

This all presupposes that the confrontation was not a success for Moe however.  We don't know if he planned to die there or not, in reality.

I personally do not believe that the Thought follows Before and After, because several key elements hardly fit.  Like allowing Akka to live, Fanayal to live, Psatma to live, etc, seem to be very bad ideas based on past experiance.  Their usefulness is only proven After, justifying the Before, which would seem to violate the principle.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 12, 2017, 01:53:49 pm
Hopefully I'll get my work done earlier today and will revisit this conversation :) . I like TTT discussions. I'm not entirely sure I have re-evaluated my thoughts on the Thought post PoN (avoided saying post-TTT as that would have been confusing, lol). As such, I'll need some time to muse.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 12, 2017, 09:02:42 pm
Also Moe's description of how the thought came to him mirrors the quote at the start of the series about a thought coming when it wants not when "i" want.

So implies some sort of agency in the thought, and maybe perhaps the thousand fold thought.

I think it is predetermined but there is a way to by-pass that, and things like seswatha heart are attempts to do it.

We have 3 prophecies (which could be attempts as well)

1. Celemonas one. Which has been given further context by Akka's dreams, although we now know they have been deceiving him... arghh can't work anything out.

2. one Aurang talks about in WLW. Possibly involving mimara.

3. One Sorweel hears about in Ishterbenith

The three most important characters ( for me ) all have some sort of mysterious voice guiding them.

Kellhus. Been hearing shit since the end of TWP.  Both Celemonas and nonman prophecy name him in some capacity

Akka. Dreams leading him across Earwa

Mimara. sees full histories and current levels of damnation. The eye informs her stances.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 13, 2017, 12:01:04 am
@Profgrape

Quote
An implacable fury swelled through Sorweel’s limbs, an urge to throttle— to strike! But it was cracked for the absence of foes, broken into aimless urgency. “They seek …” he said, using calm words to force calm into his demeanour. “They seek to save themselves from … from damnation?”“You know this as well,” Oinaral said. “You only balk because of its implication …”“Implication? What implication?” He could scream, such was the absurdity of it all. “Because it means the Anasûrimbor is An implacable fury swelled through Sorweel’s limbs, an urge to throttle— to strike! But it was cracked for the absence of foes, broken into aimless urgency. “They seek …” he said, using calm words to force calm into his demeanour. “They seek to save themselves from … from damnation?”“You know this as well,” Oinaral said. “You only balk because of its implication …”“Implication? What implication?” He could scream, such was the absurdity of it all. “Because it means the Anasûrimbor is.almost certainly your Saviour.” And there it was. The Amiolas need not blot his sense of breathing. The Mother-of-Birth had doomed him to assassinate a Living Prophet, the true Saviour.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 13, 2017, 01:29:30 am
Here is the bit i'm talking about

page 244-245 hardback

"Everyone knows of the great ruiner," Sorweel retorted. "the question is how you could you know he returns? Or that the Anusrimbor alone can forestall him?"

"It has been prophe-"

"I have been prophecied"
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 13, 2017, 02:12:08 am
Here is the bit i'm talking about

page 244-245 hardback

"Everyone knows of the great ruiner," Sorweel retorted. "the question is how you could you know he returns? Or that the Anusrimbor alone can forestall him?"

"It has been prophe-"

"I have been prophecied"

Oh, ok. Even more interesting.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 13, 2017, 12:05:11 pm
The question then is when does True Prophecy end and viramsata begin?  Is there even a line?  Or is there even such a thing as True Prophecy?

Here is the bit i'm talking about

page 244-245 hardback

"Everyone knows of the great ruiner," Sorweel retorted. "the question is how you could you know he returns? Or that the Anusrimbor alone can forestall him?"

"It has been prophe-"

"I have been prophecied"

I'm confused why Sorweel is confused.  Why couldn't Oinaral know of the Celmomian Prophecy?  Hell, he even says he was at Eleneöt.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 14, 2017, 09:37:22 pm
Also Moe's description of how the thought came to him mirrors the quote at the start of the series about a thought coming when it wants not when "i" want.

So implies some sort of agency in the thought, and maybe perhaps the thousand fold thought.
That's something from Kant or some other philosopher dude. I won't pretend to understand it, but I will say that I don't think it applies to the books. So, no, I don't believe it implies that.

I think it is predetermined but there is a way to by-pass that, and things like seswatha heart are attempts to do it.
You think Seswatha grasped the thousandfold thought, mused on it like a dunyain, and was attempting to circumvent it? That seems like a huge stretch to me.

We have 3 prophecies (which could be attempts as well)

1. Celemonas one. Which has been given further context by Akka's dreams, although we now know they have been deceiving him... arghh can't work anything out.

2. one Aurang talks about in WLW. Possibly involving mimara.

3. One Sorweel hears about in Ishterbenith
The Celemomian Prophecy has always been 2 parts. Part 1 has been fulfilled - that an anasurimbor will return at the end of the world. Confirmed with Akka's dreams, though the context changed slightly, so now we know that Kellhus IS the end of the world, according to the dream.
Part 2, that the world ends with Seswatha, is now just more confusing. How could Kellhus be the end of the world and also Seswatha. Doesn't make any sense, but thats what we have. I've taken this to mean, for years, that when Seswatha dies, the world ends, and since we've got some weird stuff going on with the heart, then that point is either when the heart is destroied, or when all the Mandati die.

Aurang's prophecy we have so little information about its hard to say anything about it. Mimara/TJE/Something is involved in a prophecy which may or may not be false.

Don't really remember the context of the Sorweel thing you mentioned, even after the quotes provided.

The three most important characters ( for me ) all have some sort of mysterious voice guiding them.

Kellhus. Been hearing shit since the end of TWP.  Both Celemonas and nonman prophecy name him in some capacity

Akka. Dreams leading him across Earwa

Mimara. sees full histories and current levels of damnation. The eye informs her stances.

Something's going on there, yeah.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 15, 2017, 05:11:47 am
The three most important characters ( for me ) all have some sort of mysterious voice guiding them.

Kellhus. Been hearing shit since the end of TWP.  Both Celemonas and nonman prophecy name him in some capacity

Akka. Dreams leading him across Earwa

Mimara. sees full histories and current levels of damnation. The eye informs her stances.

Something's going on there, yeah.


Achamian = Past

Mimara = Present

Kellhus = Future

Dunno what that means but it looks cool.

ETA: Something to bear in mind (not only because I see other people forget it so much as I myself do) is that Mimara doesn't technically have the Judging Eye, her baby does -- the eye of the unborn. I don't really know how that plays in but it's too specific not to be a hook for something down the line.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 15, 2017, 06:24:36 am
Also Moe's description of how the thought came to him mirrors the quote at the start of the series about a thought coming when it wants not when "i" want.

So implies some sort of agency in the thought, and maybe perhaps the thousand fold thought.
That's something from Kant or some other philosopher dude. I won't pretend to understand it, but I will say that I don't think it applies to the books. So, no, I don't believe it implies that.

I think it is predetermined but there is a way to by-pass that, and things like seswatha heart are attempts to do it.
You think Seswatha grasped the thousandfold thought, mused on it like a dunyain, and was attempting to circumvent it? That seems like a huge stretch to me.

We have 3 prophecies (which could be attempts as well)

1. Celemonas one. Which has been given further context by Akka's dreams, although we now know they have been deceiving him... arghh can't work anything out.

2. one Aurang talks about in WLW. Possibly involving mimara.

3. One Sorweel hears about in Ishterbenith
The Celemomian Prophecy has always been 2 parts. Part 1 has been fulfilled - that an anasurimbor will return at the end of the world. Confirmed with Akka's dreams, though the context changed slightly, so now we know that Kellhus IS the end of the world, according to the dream.
Part 2, that the world ends with Seswatha, is now just more confusing. How could Kellhus be the end of the world and also Seswatha. Doesn't make any sense, but thats what we have. I've taken this to mean, for years, that when Seswatha dies, the world ends, and since we've got some weird stuff going on with the heart, then that point is either when the heart is destroied, or when all the Mandati die.

Aurang's prophecy we have so little information about its hard to say anything about it. Mimara/TJE/Something is involved in a prophecy which may or may not be false.

Don't really remember the context of the Sorweel thing you mentioned, even after the quotes provided.

The three most important characters ( for me ) all have some sort of mysterious voice guiding them.

Kellhus. Been hearing shit since the end of TWP.  Both Celemonas and nonman prophecy name him in some capacity

Akka. Dreams leading him across Earwa

Mimara. sees full histories and current levels of damnation. The eye informs her stances.

Something's going on there, yeah.


Sorry never explained it properly :(

No i think Seswatha was told or grasped that "all this had happened before". Or in other words things were progressing to a pre-determined end point. So the heart and the dreams are ostensibly to keep the fanaticism of the mandate but they are also an attempt at influencing the pre-determined outcome in some way i'm not smart enough to figure out.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 15, 2017, 06:44:43 am
Also Moe's description of how the thought came to him mirrors the quote at the start of the series about a thought coming when it wants not when "i" want.

So implies some sort of agency in the thought, and maybe perhaps the thousand fold thought.
That's something from Kant or some other philosopher dude. I won't pretend to understand it, but I will say that I don't think it applies to the books. So, no, I don't believe it implies that.



"I shall never tire of underlining a concise little fact which these superstitious people are loath to admit-namely, A thought comes when it will, not when I will.”

― Friedrich Nietzsche

It's at the start of the book and describes the main theme of the book to a T, imo. I think in the false sun story this phenomenon is referred to as "Onkis".

As Moe says "i was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to me"

I went and got the full quote longer to add context

"“When did you realize you didn’t possess the strength,” Kellhus asked, “that more was needed to avert the No-God’s second coming?”
“From the very first I recognized that it was probable,” Moënghus said. “But I spent years assessing the possibilities, gathering knowledge. When the first of the Thought came to me, I was quite unprepared."
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 15, 2017, 08:09:01 am
Good stuff, Merchant. That Moe line is definitely no accident, and I agree with your interpretation thus far.

The False Sun really is a treasure trove of hints and clues IMO, far more than its credited for (and its pretty well credited).
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Monkhound on January 15, 2017, 06:17:51 pm
You think Seswatha grasped the thousandfold thought, mused on it like a dunyain, and was attempting to circumvent it? That seems like a huge stretch to me.

Interesting thought.
The way Seswatha is connected to the Mandate via the Dreams (1 on *unaccounted number*, let's say 100), looks a bit like the inverted way Kellhus is connected to The Voice / The Legion Within (100 on 1), though. Dreams and hallucinations aren't so different from each other, after all.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 16, 2017, 11:24:23 am
"I shall never tire of underlining a concise little fact which these superstitious people are loath to admit-namely, A thought comes when it will, not when I will.”

― Friedrich Nietzsche

It's at the start of the book and describes the main theme of the book to a T, imo. I think in the false sun story this phenomenon is referred to as "Onkis".

As Moe says "i was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to me"

I went and got the full quote longer to add context

"“When did you realize you didn’t possess the strength,” Kellhus asked, “that more was needed to avert the No-God’s second coming?”
“From the very first I recognized that it was probable,” Moënghus said. “But I spent years assessing the possibilities, gathering knowledge. When the first of the Thought came to me, I was quite unprepared."

Indeed, I think that is a big clue to the Thought being external to Moe, not a creation of his.

It could also explain why Moe "had" to die, since the Thought was always from a place beyond him, it needn't always include him.  In other words, he is simply another cog in the machine, not the engine (although he played a role of that for a time).
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 16, 2017, 02:32:21 pm
I think combining TTT and Kellhus' internal mystery voice into one thing is folly.

TTT is not an entity itself, its a thought. Multiple people have grasped it, even the half Dunyain. I believe Maithanet, inrilatas, and kelmomas all grasped it. There might even be hints in the Survivor sections of some grasping there, but I might be making that bit up.

Granted, the explanation that the Thought just talks to whoever it want explains this as well, but it seems that there would be more than just a bunch of crazy dunyain half-breeds and their parents that this sentient Thought thing would reach out too.. No, I think the common denominator is the probability trance, Occam's razor this and its just an extension of that. (Occam would not have done well with musing about these books though :P )
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 16, 2017, 03:16:07 pm
I think combing TTT and Kellhus' internal mystery voice into one thing is folly.

TTT is not an entity itself, its a thought. Multiple people have grasped it, even the half Dunyain. I believe Maithanet, inrilatas, and kelmomas all grasped it. There might even be hints in the Survivor sections of some grasping there, but I might be making that bit up.

It certainly is open to I don't believe that is true though.  Indeed, they all mention the Thought, but show no inkling (that I can find) of actually fully understanding it.

Take the exchange of Maith and Inrilatas:
Quote
"Was it her? Did she tell you about the Thousandfold Thought?"
"And you see me," the naked adolescent pressed, "the fact that I have been caged rather than drowned, as the most glaring example of your elder brother's folly."

[...]

"I fear that you might be..." the Shriah said. "I admit as much. But if you can see this, Inrilatas, then your father has seen it also—and far more completely. If he sees no sedition in my fearing, why should you?"

I would submit this as possible evidence to, at least, demonstrate the Maith does not grasp the Thought.  Simple because, if he did, he would not be questioning why Inrilatas is still alive.  I think it is more debatable if Inrilatas himself grasps it, which I am genuinely unsure of.  Presumably either does and realizes his role, or doesn't and just exacts it like any other just with the knowledge of being moved but unsure how.

The wild-card is Kelmomas.  I don't recall any evidence that he knows of the Thought besides it's existence.  However, is what he does part of the Thought?  And so, is what happens with Inrilatas part of it?  Or is it different means to the same outcome?

Quote
Granted, the explanation that the Thought just talks to whoever it want explains this as well, but it seems that there would be more than just a bunch of crazy dunyain half-breeds and their parents that this sentient Thought thing would reach out too.. No, I think the common denominator is the probability trance, Occam's razor this and its just an extension of that. (Occam would not have done well with musing about these books though :P )

Plausible, but that doesn't sate my need for crack-pottery,  ;)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 16, 2017, 04:58:12 pm
Well, from Moe and Kellhus convo, we essentially o.o what the TTT is, right? Its a way to stop the rise of the No-God And defeat the Consult. So, any Dunyain, part or whole, could grasp this post TTT (the book). Thing is, I think the TTT outgrew Moe's initial thought, and has everything to do with the Voice. The Voice is the one thing none of the other Dunyain have, hence why Maitha says what he says to Inri. They have no idea what the TTT has grown into.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 16, 2017, 05:00:39 pm
"I shall never tire of underlining a concise little fact which these superstitious people are loath to admit-namely, A thought comes when it will, not when I will.”

― Friedrich Nietzsche

It's at the start of the book and describes the main theme of the book to a T, imo. I think in the false sun story this phenomenon is referred to as "Onkis".

As Moe says "i was quite unprepared when the first of the thought came to me"

I went and got the full quote longer to add context

"“When did you realize you didn’t possess the strength,” Kellhus asked, “that more was needed to avert the No-God’s second coming?”
“From the very first I recognized that it was probable,” Moënghus said. “But I spent years assessing the possibilities, gathering knowledge. When the first of the Thought came to me, I was quite unprepared."

Indeed, I think that is a big clue to the Thought being external to Moe, not a creation of his.

It could also explain why Moe "had" to die, since the Thought was always from a place beyond him, it needn't always include him.  In other words, he is simply another cog in the machine, not the engine (although he played a role of that for a time).

Kellhus muses something about how Moe didn't realise the thought would outgrow it's body of incubation or something like that.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 16, 2017, 05:08:44 pm
Kellhus muses something about how Moe didn't realise the thought would outgrow it's body of incubation or something like that.

Well, what if The Thousandfold Thought is a Probability Trace but one that feeds back to itself?  That is, it is recursive and creates a feedback loop.

So it almost becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy machine.  In this way, Wilshire and I can both be right.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 16, 2017, 05:13:16 pm
I think combining TTT and Kellhus' internal mystery voice into one thing is folly.

TTT is not an entity itself, its a thought. Multiple people have grasped it, even the half Dunyain. I believe Maithanet, inrilatas, and kelmomas all grasped it. There might even be hints in the Survivor sections of some grasping there, but I might be making that bit up.

Granted, the explanation that the Thought just talks to whoever it want explains this as well, but it seems that there would be more than just a bunch of crazy dunyain half-breeds and their parents that this sentient Thought thing would reach out too.. No, I think the common denominator is the probability trance, Occam's razor this and its just an extension of that. (Occam would not have done well with musing about these books though :P )

Nah the voices and the thoughts are separate in my view.

The thought is the predetermined actions, I don't know what the voice is, so many people hear them, it might be different things.

Some people know it's name, doesn't mean they have grasped it. Esme knows it's name, she hasn't grasped it. I cannot recall any evidence that any of the named people have grasped it, beyond knowing it exists and naming it.

As Richard Feynman says "You can know the name of a bird in all the languages of the world, but when you're finished, you'll know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird... So let's look at the bird and see what it's doing -- that's what counts. I learned very early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something."

Again the Thought is separate from the voice in my crackpot interpretation.

For instance I think Little Kel voice is ultimately a tool of Kellhus. Since we're also talking Malazan in the quorum as i type this, he was kellhus "shaved knuckle in the hole" against the white luck warrior.

I'll need to get all my TGO "revelations" written down before TUC, used to having more time to spread it out. A titbit is i think it's the real Lord Kosoter who mouths fungal warnings from Kellhus's belt :O
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 16, 2017, 05:17:41 pm
Kellhus muses something about how Moe didn't realise the thought would outgrow it's body of incubation or something like that.

Well, what if The Thousandfold Thought is a Probability Trace but one that feeds back to itself?  That is, it is recursive and creates a feedback loop.

So it almost becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy machine.  In this way, Wilshire and I can both be right.

Hey you guys have more chance of being right than me :D

I think it is self-fulfilling in the way the Moeghus thought he authored it so went about fulfilling it. Not realising he is just doing what always happened anyway. No one has agency that was what i took from the koringhus internal struggles, why Kellhus just thinks he is a mechanism of the thought. Why thelli worked out he was nobody just what he needed to be.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 16, 2017, 05:33:10 pm
Funny how a meaningful world still means there is not meaning :P
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 16, 2017, 06:11:12 pm
I don't think all the Voices are the same. Kelmommas surely isn't hearing the Voice The Kellhus does. Its why I think that the Voice Kellhus hears (himself in the Outside, half ape/half Monk) is stearing the TTT. Kelmommas no would venture to say is hearing his dead brother sammy, who knows nothing of TTT. I don't subsribe to the theory that all Voices being heard are one and the same.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 16, 2017, 06:24:20 pm
I don't think all the Voices are the same. Kelmommas surely isn't hearing the Voice The Kellhus does. Its why I think that the Voice Kellhus hears (himself in the Outside, half ape/half Monk) is stearing the TTT. Kelmommas no would venture to say is hearing his dead brother sammy, who knows nothing of TTT. I don't subsribe to the theory that all Voices being heard are one and the same.

Indeed, I hadn't considered otherwise, but never thought to note it.  From that Bakker interview he did where he compared his role and a DM to that of a "dark god" I went from doubtful on the Ajolki influence to well convinced it is real and what is guiding Kel.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 16, 2017, 06:39:05 pm
I don't think all the Voices are the same. Kelmommas surely isn't hearing the Voice The Kellhus does. Its why I think that the Voice Kellhus hears (himself in the Outside, half ape/half Monk) is stearing the TTT. Kelmommas no would venture to say is hearing his dead brother sammy, who knows nothing of TTT. I don't subsribe to the theory that all Voices being heard are one and the same.

Indeed, I hadn't considered otherwise, but never thought to note it.  From that Bakker interview he did where he compared his role and a DM to that of a "dark god" I went from doubtful on the Ajolki influence to well convinced it is real and what is guiding Kel.

Sorry, I thought themerchant was considering them all to be the same (excuse me if I'm wrong merch). Youve swayed me H. I think Kellhus(The Voice) is steering the Thought from the Outside. That's why Kellhus is more, he is mad. Remember, when Akka explains Madness to Cnauir? Its the Outside bleeding through to your soul. That's what is happening with Kellhus. He visits the Outside, has dreams from the Outside. And, he listens.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 16, 2017, 10:44:28 pm
Nah I don't think they are all the same source. I think little Kel is being guided by Kellhus. What voice Kellhus is hearing I don't know.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 16, 2017, 11:07:13 pm
Indeed, I hadn't considered otherwise, but never thought to note it.  From that Bakker interview he did where he compared his role and a DM to that of a "dark god" I went from doubtful on the Ajolki influence to well convinced it is real and what is guiding Kel.

Pssh, you need RSB to give you some random tidbit, to finally come over to Kelmommas is Ajokli's Narindar...... Dude, I've been saying it since the Slog and I had enough evidence for my liking then. TGO, just confirmed what I already knew. Yet, is the Voice truly Ajokli or Sammi. I'd say it's Ajokli and just guises his self as Sammi. Why, might you ask. When Esmi tells of the twins separation, the guy who did it said there was a chance for a unwelcome force to take control. Id say at the moment of seperation, Ajokli stepped in. And yes, I agree, Kellhus is just as blind to Kelmommas as the rest of the gods, excluding Ajokli.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 17, 2017, 05:19:07 am
Now I like where this is headed.

If Ajokli is indeed the Voice for Kelmomas (and I fully agree there are many "voices" at play which are distinct from each other), then who exactly is Ajokli?

Who bit Kelmomas's neck until it bled, so as to remind him/self as "how things were before"?

And even then, we know from RSB's Westeros.org Q&A that "Ajokli is not the one who's invisible".

How to reconcile all of this...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 17, 2017, 06:20:38 am
Now I like where this is headed.

If Ajokli is indeed the Voice for Kelmomas (and I fully agree there are many "voices" at play which are distinct from each other), then who exactly is Ajokli?

And even then, we know from RSB's Westeros.org Q&A that "Ajokli is not the one who's invisible".

How to reconcile all of this...

I posted in "The Gods" thread how it seems Ajokli is described as a companion of the Gods. I think Ajokli might be someone we know, someone that figured out a way to "ascend" you might say. Who that is, I don't know.

As to RSB's statement at Westeros, I think he was just alluding to the No-God or maybe even Kelmommas....
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 17, 2017, 07:08:23 am
Now I like where this is headed.

If Ajokli is indeed the Voice for Kelmomas (and I fully agree there are many "voices" at play which are distinct from each other), then who exactly is Ajokli?

And even then, we know from RSB's Westeros.org Q&A that "Ajokli is not the one who's invisible".

How to reconcile all of this...

I posted in "The Gods" thread how it seems Ajokli is described as a companion of the Gods. I think Ajokli might be someone we know, someone that figured out a way to "ascend" you might say. Who that is, I don't know.

As to RSB's statement at Westeros, I think he was just alluding to the No-God or maybe even Kelmommas....

(http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/Clever+girl_c9ffdd_5284138.gif)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 17, 2017, 01:17:49 pm
I never really considered Ajolki as anything else besides a god like Yatwer.  I guess it is possible, but Ajolki has presumably existed since all the other 100.  Perhaps we can consider  the backward time effect here, but then why not consider it for all the other gods too?

Seems like a Pandora's Box...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 17, 2017, 02:15:08 pm
i really like Ajokli. He showed wee Kel how to properly feck with someone.

For me it has to be Kellhus in some capacity directing him, as it is Kel warning/shouting "mommy" that makes Kellhus take "a single step" that then moves him out of the way of what the WLW thought was going to happen. Then the WLW is astounded , which is what Kellhus says in the scene before "you can see everything and be blind" "even the infinite can be surprised"

Then the next scene he is in Yatwer through the WLW is surprised.

This suggests to me either he knew it was going to happen or he made it happen, or he could just have been shit talking back to Yatwer and had no idea that what he said would come true later that day.

I also wonder what the real devotee of Ajokli had seen when he gutted the dove in the old way. He also talks about being blind i believe to the WLW.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 17, 2017, 03:02:33 pm
Or maybe Kellhus is Ajolki?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 17, 2017, 03:25:59 pm
I never really considered Ajolki as anything else besides a god like Yatwer.  I guess it is possible, but Ajolki has presumably existed since all the other 100.  Perhaps we can consider  the backward time effect here, but then why not consider it for all the other gods too?

Seems like a Pandora's Box...

Me either, but it says it right there in the appendix. So, me thinks it's thrown in there for a reason.

@themerchant, see I always felt in that scene that Kellhus was just as surprised as the WLW. Without Kel screaming "mommy" Kellhus dies. Why the charade? Why would Kellhus control Kelmommas to say "mommy" so he can take a step and keep on living?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 17, 2017, 04:49:21 pm
I never really considered Ajolki as anything else besides a god like Yatwer.  I guess it is possible, but Ajolki has presumably existed since all the other 100.  Perhaps we can consider  the backward time effect here, but then why not consider it for all the other gods too?

Seems like a Pandora's Box...

Me either, but it says it right there in the appendix. So, me thinks it's thrown in there for a reason.

@themerchant, see I always felt in that scene that Kellhus was just as surprised as the WLW. Without Kel screaming "mommy" Kellhus dies. Why the charade? Why would Kellhus control Kelmommas to say "mommy" so he can take a step and keep on living?

Now this could be someone trying to help Kellhus, as opposed to Kellhus himself, but i think it was an attempt to dodge the WLW and it worked. Finding out how it worked will also give answers to how the god's work how you can sidestep fate.

Well the reason he controlled him was to dodge the white-luck, which he would be directly blind to, so he needed a warning which wee Kel provided by shouting.. Kellhus wasn't surprised he heard the voice then immediately took a step.

Wee Kel is there thinking with certainty his "role" in this is to "distract father"

"He would help-Yes! He would distract father.Yes!That was his role. That was how it had already happened. He could feel it,somehow,like an oracular density in his bones"

Obviously something happens and Kelmomas is central to it. The chronology could be viewed as this.

1. Kelmomas gets whelmed (maybe by Kellhus i went back and checked dates and it happened way before Skaparus) by Kellhus and then follows a bug to Ajokli where he makes some sort of pact.

2. WLW comes into the palace and Kelmomas uses the secret palace that Kellhus built (which doesn't seem like something he would need) to hide himself from him and monitor him. Where internally he is "certain" he is safe if he just keeps watching the WLW. Which he couldn't do without the secret palace.

3 Kellhus speaks to Yatwers spokesperson about how the infinite can be surprised.

4. The WLW is not only surpised he is "gawking...stupefied"

Other bits are Kel knowing about the ordeal, mages fighting sranc etc.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: profgrape on January 17, 2017, 04:58:02 pm
It might be that Kellhus used Kelmomas to entice Ajokli, basically developed his own God-entangled agent.  So while Ajokli is the Voice, it's Kellhus who orchestrated the whole thing as a foil against the machinations of the 100.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 17, 2017, 05:20:20 pm
It might be that Kellhus used Kelmomas to entice Ajokli, basically developed his own God-entangled agent.  So while Ajokli is the Voice, it's Kellhus who orchestrated the whole thing as a foil against the machinations of the 100.

A good point, perhaps that is a key to the full Thousandfold Thought, assessing and planning for the involvement of the gods?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: profgrape on January 17, 2017, 05:42:23 pm
It might be that Kellhus used Kelmomas to entice Ajokli, basically developed his own God-entangled agent.  So while Ajokli is the Voice, it's Kellhus who orchestrated the whole thing as a foil against the machinations of the 100.

A good point, perhaps that is a key to the full Thousandfold Thought, assessing and planning for the involvement of the gods?

Maybe. Seems like either TTT or Kellhus' own discoveries would indicate that at some point, the Gods would act against an attempt to rewrite the World's metaphysics.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on January 17, 2017, 05:52:48 pm
Maybe. Seems like either TTT or Kellhus' own discoveries would indicate that at some point, the Gods would act against an attempt to rewrite the World's metaphysics.

Thinking about it, that is another strike against Maith understanding the Thought, he is surprised by the god's acting to kill him.  I think it is safe to say that if he understood the Thought fully, he would realize what was going to happen/not be surprised by the narindar.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 17, 2017, 05:54:56 pm
I'm not saying Kellhus knew it would unfold beforehand, more like he had set up an alarm that would go off at a one point he couldn't anticipate directly. Then react to the alarm as opposed to preempting the threat.

If Uncle holy had one set up, Kelmomas would have been following the WLW and appeared, shouted something, then Maithanet would step to the side and the knife would slice through air.

That's the concept i'm trying to convey. I don't know who the voice is. It might be Ajokli working in cahoots with Kellhus cause Ajokli "can see"/ has knowledge of something the other gods don't. It might be samaras, again Kellhus found the healer that separated them, there is also an unspecified twin theme running through the books. Especially Kelmomas and Celmomas, who have dead twins "talking to them".

It could be Kellhus had nothing to do with it, but something saved him, and not many folk seem to want to do that lol.

As usual probably wrong.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: profgrape on January 17, 2017, 06:14:15 pm
Right.  I don't think that Kellhus planned the whole thing out.  More that he set up Kel to be a sleeper agent.  Now that I think about it, I wonder if Kellhus foresaw the Gods attacking the Empire directly and that Kel is his ace-in-the-hole (or "shaved knuckle", as Quick Ben would put it).  Kellhus might have even Conditioned Kelmomas' obsession with Esme to make him the perfect protector.

+1 to "as usual probably wrong" :-)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 17, 2017, 09:36:57 pm
Right.  I don't think that Kellhus planned the whole thing out.  More that he set up Kel to be a sleeper agent.  Now that I think about it, I wonder if Kellhus foresaw the Gods attacking the Empire directly and that Kel is his ace-in-the-hole (or "shaved knuckle", as Quick Ben would put it).  Kellhus might have even Conditioned Kelmomas' obsession with Esme to make him the perfect protector.

+1 to "as usual probably wrong" :-)

You guys could very well be right. Kellhus certainly has his hand on everything else. My question is, why even introduce all the hubbbub about Ajokli?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: profgrape on January 17, 2017, 10:32:39 pm
Right.  I don't think that Kellhus planned the whole thing out.  More that he set up Kel to be a sleeper agent.  Now that I think about it, I wonder if Kellhus foresaw the Gods attacking the Empire directly and that Kel is his ace-in-the-hole (or "shaved knuckle", as Quick Ben would put it).  Kellhus might have even Conditioned Kelmomas' obsession with Esme to make him the perfect protector.

+1 to "as usual probably wrong" :-)

You guys could very well be right. Kellhus certainly has his hand on everything else. My question is, why even introduce all the hubbbub about Ajokli?

It's a huge stretch.  But I think it all comes down to the fact that Ajokli's influences aren't perceived by the other Gods.  So by entangling Ajokli with Kelmomas, he creates an agent who's actions lie outside the Gods' purview.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 17, 2017, 10:54:39 pm
Right.  I don't think that Kellhus planned the whole thing out.  More that he set up Kel to be a sleeper agent.  Now that I think about it, I wonder if Kellhus foresaw the Gods attacking the Empire directly and that Kel is his ace-in-the-hole (or "shaved knuckle", as Quick Ben would put it).  Kellhus might have even Conditioned Kelmomas' obsession with Esme to make him the perfect protector.

+1 to "as usual probably wrong" :-)

You guys could very well be right. Kellhus certainly has his hand on everything else. My question is, why even introduce all the hubbbub about Ajokli?

It's a huge stretch.  But I think it all comes down to the fact that Ajokli's influences aren't perceived by the other Gods.  So by entangling Ajokli with Kelmomas, he creates an agent who's actions lie outside the Gods' purview.

So I'm other words. Kel is the Narindarnof Ajokli, but, Kellhus was the author of it. Knowing that when separating the twins it would give the Trickster the opportunity to sieze. I guess if H is right, the Voice and dreams would've directed Kellhus's thinking like anything else. I guess, me personally, I'd like to see another agency at work besides Kellhus. I think it very intriguing and mysterious why Ajokli might want to aid Kellhus.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: profgrape on January 17, 2017, 11:18:16 pm
It may well be another agency and that would definitely be cool. 

The other thing that makes me think it might be Kellhus is his comment to Proyas about having certain resources in the ground in Momemn.  But I've gone horribly off topic. ;-)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on January 17, 2017, 11:43:38 pm
It may well be another agency and that would definitely be cool. 

The other thing that makes me think it might be Kellhus is his comment to Proyas about having certain resources in the ground in Momemn.  But I've gone horribly off topic. ;-)

Yes, and the quote themerchant provided from Kellhus to Ptsama, definitely is very good textual evidence that Kellhus is behind it. To me, in a way, it takes away from the story that Kellhus has solo much control over eveything. Yet, I think Locke might be right, that in the end there will be some detail that Kellhus overlooks that could be his undoing. As with Yatwer, the infinite can be surprised......
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 18, 2017, 04:18:05 pm
Yet, I think Locke might be right, that in the end there will be some detail that Kellhus overlooks that could be his undoing. As with Yatwer, the infinite can be surprised......

Its a central theme. I posted this in the quorum earlier but again:

Every major power in the book that has thought itself infallible has, so far, been toppled by something that completely blindsided them. Its a reoccurring theme, that no matter how powerful and omniscient someone/thing is, there is always something outside of their grasp.
The notable exception to this is Kellhus, though we might argue that the very last scene in TGO is confirmation that Kellhus isn't so omniscient.
Think about it. Cnaiur, Conphas, Xerius, Moenghus Sr., Maithanet, Yatwer/WLW, Titirga... Each, at the very pinnacle of their power, is brought down by something almost entirely unknown to them, usually to their ultimate demise.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: profgrape on January 18, 2017, 04:28:41 pm
Yet, I think Locke might be right, that in the end there will be some detail that Kellhus overlooks that could be his undoing. As with Yatwer, the infinite can be surprised......

Its a central theme. I posted this in the quorum earlier but again:

Every major power in the book that has thought itself infallible has, so far, been toppled by something that completely blindsided them. Its a reoccurring theme, that no matter how powerful and omniscient someone/thing is, there is always something outside of their grasp.
The notable exception to this is Kellhus, though we might argue that the very last scene in TGO is confirmation that Kellhus isn't so omniscient.
Think about it. Cnaiur, Conphas, Xerius, Moenghus Sr., Maithanet, Yatwer/WLW, Titirga... Each, at the very pinnacle of their power, is brought down by something almost entirely unknown to them, usually to their ultimate demise.

Not dissimilar between what happens in our world -- things are too chaotic to grasp the whole.  Six-sigma events get us all in the end.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 18, 2017, 05:11:18 pm
Six-sigma events get us all in the end.
lol. Yes. Those fringe cases. Wonder if six-sigma is a phrase most people would get though? Its not something I'd think came up much in your industry either :P , shows what I know.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Francis Buck on January 28, 2017, 05:47:02 am
(Re-posting from the Koringhus thread since it's relevant to matters of the Soul/Spirit)

So, I actually noticed this almost immediately when reading TGO the first time, but didn't know what it meant/symbolized until now, having finally remembered to look it up.

As described in the text, the Boy/Survivor, son of Koringhus, has lost three fingers leaving only his index and thumb. Knowing the author's fondness for apophasis, I was reminded of (and just now learned the name of) Hindu and yoga gesture you've likely seen before. It is called the chin mudra.

(http://sacred-earth.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834539cc469e200e553acb0758834-pi)

Quote
The thumb and forefinger on each of the hands are joined, forming a zero. The rest of the fingers are extended. The hands are placed palms-up on the thighs or knees while sitting in vajrasana. This mudrā supposedly activates the diaphragm, making for deep "stomach-breathing" as the diaphragm pushes out the internal organs when it descends towards the pelvis on inhalation. Slow breathing in a 5-2-4-2 mentally counted rhythm (counting to 5 during the exhalation, to 2 while holding the breath, and to 4 on the inhalation) causes prana flow in the pelvis and in the legs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudra

Also...

Quote
Chin means consciousness in Sanskrit, and the purpose of this mudra is to remind the practitioner of the goal of yoga, the union of the individual soul with the supreme soul. Mudra means seal, and it is essentially an energetic and spiritual gesture that controls the flow of energy within the body. The fingers each have representations:

Thumb: Supreme Soul
Pointer: Individual Soul
Middle: Ego
Ring: Illusion
Pinky: Karma

Ego, illusion and karma are the 3 impurities that the yogi is trying to remove from his life in order to unite their Individual Soul with the Supreme Soul and experience that divine, blissful state of union they strive for. Doing chin mudra is a physical representation and reminder of this goal and serves to refocus and re-energize the practitioner.

http://thechalkboardmag.com/mantra-monday-chin-mudra

I think that the "Supreme Soul" and "Individual Soul" are directly relatable to what Kellhus references with Greater Proyas and Lesser Proyas.

This opens a lot of doors. Karma, in fact, may be what Mimara sees as "Judgement" -- an otherwise invisible accumulation of "weight" incurred by a souls mere existence and movement (life) throughout the world.

Also, even though the distinction has yet to be made in-text, I think that Souls may be the lesser/individual souls, while a Spirit is the greater/supreme soul -- Gods, Ciphrang, and so forth.

Perhaps Seswatha himself (or itself) is one of these Supreme Souls, distributed through many Individual Souls via the Heart...
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on January 30, 2017, 08:59:29 pm
I'm digging your symbology work FB. That's a nice find.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on January 30, 2017, 11:15:47 pm
Following onto that, when Kellhus is trying to see his father through the water all he can see is "two fingers and thumb" and the thumbnail gleamed.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on February 01, 2017, 12:52:02 pm
Following onto that, when Kellhus is trying to see his father through the water all he can see is "two fingers and thumb" and the thumbnail gleamed.

Crazy, the thumb being the representation of the "supreme soul."

So, what does it mean?  That Moe's soul was shining?  Or is it the god shining through him?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on February 01, 2017, 06:28:46 pm
Nah, just means he was in a meditative posture.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on February 01, 2017, 08:26:22 pm
Nah, just means he was in a meditative posture.

Sure, but then why bother mentioning the thumbnail gleaming?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Monkhound on February 02, 2017, 07:03:16 am
If my memory serves,  the gleaming comes from light refracting in the water. There was something about water coming out of Moe's eyes in that scene.

Edit: I can't look it up. I lent my copy of TTT to a friend.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on February 02, 2017, 01:15:23 pm
If my memory serves,  the gleaming comes from light refracting in the water. There was something about water coming out of Moe's eyes in that scene.

Edit: I can't look it up. I lent my copy of TTT to a friend.

I guess you are recalling this?

Quote
“Nations live as Men act,” Moënghus said, his voice refracted through the ambient rush of waters. “Men act as they believe. And Men believe as they are conditioned. Since they are blind to their conditioning, they do not doubt their intuitions …”
Kellhus nodded in wary assent. “They believe absolutely,” he said.

But that's his voice, not any light.  That is the two lines that preceded this:

Quote
All Kellhus could see of his father were two fingers and a thumb lying slack upon a bare thigh. The thumbnail gleamed.

So, the question is, why would you, as a writer, craft a sentence who's only point is the tell that a thumbnail gleamed, if it was meaningless?
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on February 02, 2017, 04:18:47 pm
Stripping things down too much is as obfuscating as looking at things too broadly.
Those two sentences help set the scene. Little details like that make things come alive.

"The thumbnail gleamed" is indeed an odd sentence by itself, but when taken in context its really not. Again, I think its just minutiae to help set the scene. Why? Because there's never any follow up. That is perhaps the only mention of 'thumbnail' in the entirety of the series.

You might do a search of the word 'thumbnail' and 'gleamed' or any of its synonyms, and look at all those sentences lined up side by side. What would you have? If you had more than 1 instance, you'd have a bunch of shiny thumbs, but no context.

You'd have to look at each paragraph, or possibly each POV and/or chapter, to get anything at all. The point being that you can't pull it apart into single sentences or words. You've gone to deep, friend. The forest, too thick, for the trees.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on February 02, 2017, 06:21:49 pm
I've read that scene more than any other, i haven't found why it would be gleaming, the light can't pierce the water. Kelhus himself stops trying to pierce the water to see through.

The whole scene has possible(that's the problem) meanings.

Moe sitting behind cataracts of great amounts of water so Kellhus can't see him. Weird since Moe is so weak in the Water.

Pink imprints on the cloth.

The incongruity with grasping the TTT as he had already been told he would grasp it. This goes even weirder as the person who told him looks just like Kellhus and Moe (the Cish that zig-zagged to him),

kicking the skull ,

kellhus following a voice from nowhere to look about the place.

Moe experimenting with Skinspies.

The whole meeting taking place at where Inri sejenus ascended.

Some answers from Moe "imperceptive slower" than others.

Plus a few other things i've forgotten as this is from memory. I think this scene might have forshadowing if any scene is going to have it.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on February 02, 2017, 06:24:11 pm
There was something about water coming out of Moe's eyes in that scene.

Edit: I can't look it up. I lent my copy of TTT to a friend.

Not Moe's eyes. He walks through the water coming from two eyes above him as he says "this is where the probability trance failed me"
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Monkhound on February 02, 2017, 06:42:54 pm
Ah, that may be it, I suppose. As said, I can't check it due to having borrowed my copy to a friend :)
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on February 02, 2017, 06:43:44 pm
But all those things seem to have meaning only because we want them too. You can do this exercise with every scene in the book and you won't necessarily get anywhere. Maybe there is or isn't, but we're nearly 4 books past it and none the wiser.

Maybe a couple sentences here or there in TAE, but largely the information in this scene appears to be all we'll ever get.

I've read that scene more than any other, i haven't found why it would be gleaming, the light can't pierce the water. Kelhus himself stops trying to pierce the water to see through.

Check out a waterfall some time. If you can, in the dark with a flashlight. Light pierces it but that doesn't mean you can see through it. Same issue with having a campfire in the dark and you can't see outside the immediate circle of light.

Light's still going past where you can see. Its just refracting and too diffuse to make sense of. It can simultaneously make it appear that the thumbnail is gleaming while also being too dim to see through the other side.

Moe sitting behind cataracts of great amounts of water so Kellhus can't see him. Weird since Moe is so weak in the Water.

Look, Water and water are two different things. He's sitting under a waterfall, full was water. The H2O kind. Nothing to do with Water, the metaphysical kind.

Pink imprints on the cloth.
This is frustrating. I'm going to chaulk it up to minor continuity/timeline issues. Bakker has some issues with time throughout, especially in TGO. There's no reason for there to be blood on the cloth, however I think the idea Bakker had was to show Moe proving to Kellhus he blinded himself. Granted, it should have been so long ago that unless the wounds are stigmata, they should be healed.

The incongruity with grasping the TTT as he had already been told he would grasp it.

Its not really incongruous in any way. He either really would have grasped it regardless of the foreknowledge, or its some total farce. Since TTT more/less worked out, its a pretty safe bet that its a real thing, so we can assume the hint was irrelevant.

 

This goes even weirder as the person who told him looks just like Kellhus and Moe (the Cish that zig-zagged to him),
A different question entirely. It is in fact very odd that this particular Cish looked like Moenghus. Was it wearing a blindfold? How could he even tell. No answers here on that one though.


kicking the skull ,
Foreshadowing almost certainly, but most likely foreshadowing either 'danger ahead' (lol jokes) and/or the death that occurs almost immediately afterward - ie Moenghus.


kellhus following a voice from nowhere to look about the place.
Internal monologue


Moe experimenting with Skinspies.
Kellhus was already doing this on the road. Why no Moe? Seems normal.


The whole meeting taking place at where Inri sejenus ascended.
Yes, an interesting bit.


Some answers from Moe "imperceptive slower" than others.
Lines up with dipping into the probablitliy trance. Standard dunyain stuff. Though makes me chuckle, if its imperceptible, then he shouldnt be noticing it.


Plus a few other things i've forgotten as this is from memory. I think this scene might have forshadowing if any scene is going to have it.

This scene, and all the others, especially if you stare at it too long.
I think we're well into Epileptic Tree (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EpilepticTrees) territory with this scene.




Aside, if someone comes up with a theory on why the thumb gleaming is important to the series, I'll gladly read about it :) .



There was something about water coming out of Moe's eyes in that scene.

Edit: I can't look it up. I lent my copy of TTT to a friend.

Not Moe's eyes. He walks through the water coming from two eyes above him as he says "this is where the probability trance failed me"
There's also a bit about it looking like he's crying , IIRC. Its just water running down his face from the waterfall.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: themerchant on February 02, 2017, 07:06:21 pm
Well remember i think Moe ensouled the skinspy Simas, not the Consult. So the experiments was in that context, and i reaching for things that one jumped into my mind, even though not relevant in the same sense.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on February 02, 2017, 09:21:55 pm
Well, my two cents? That meeting is chalked full of meaning. I think it would be wrong not to take every little thing in that meeting and analyze it. Because, ultimately we don't know if the salting was exactly what Moe wanted or not. I am not a big Moe is behind everything and all that, but many here (um hum, Wilshire) said we were dumb to the Cnaiur lived in any capacity. I'd say that meeting is the most important part of the text we've thus far come across. I think it laden with hidden meaning and insight. Just my opinion.

@Wilshire, I do love your sense of practicality and "it is what it is" attitude. I imagine you very practical, show me the truth type of man. Reminds me.of my father. That's a compliment by the way.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on February 03, 2017, 04:03:01 pm
I'm almost entirely contrarian in nature, its compulsive. Too much agreeing makes my head spin, so you'll see me in turn support or argue against just about any theory around (except that Moe fucked up and died, that was a steadfast decision of mine from the start).

 Its honestly hard for me to say which way I really feel, but also irrelevant. All the good discussions arise from disagreement, so its the disagreement itself, rather than argument, that I find enjoyable:) . To a point, of course, as its easy to get carried away doing that and then everything just breaks down entirely.
A knife's edge.

As for Cnaiur still being alive, that's definitely the last time I'm letting Bakker's out-of-text 'answers' override discussions/theories. Not that I think he is a liar, but I think his need for obfuscation is so great, and his attention to detail so low, that he unintentionally says things that are simply not true but are in his head a super clever way of dodging the question.

Practical? Yes. "It is what it is", not so much. I'll take the compliment :D . Your description, in turn, reminds me of my own father, who I hold in the greatest esteem.


Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on February 03, 2017, 10:31:21 pm
I'm almost entirely contrarian in nature, its compulsive. Too much agreeing makes my head spin, so you'll see me in turn support or argue against just about any theory around (except that Moe fucked up and died, that was a steadfast decision of mine from the start).

 Its honestly hard for me to say which way I really feel, but also irrelevant. All the good discussions arise from disagreement, so its the disagreement itself, rather than argument, that I find enjoyable:) . To a point, of course, as its easy to get carried away doing that and then everything just breaks down entirely.
A knife's edge.

Now, that sounds exactly like my father, also. I'm not trying to give you a blow job here, lol. It's just your take on things and, yes, the choice to question or argue reminds me of my Dad (truly, my Grandfather who is 78, your and old soul Wilshire).


Quote
Practical? Yes. "It is what it is", not so much. I'll take the compliment :D . Your description, in turn, reminds me of my own father, who I hold in the greatest esteem.

Your welcome, and I hope you all know that I'm the worst person on the Internet at trying to get across my point sometimes. Is what it is, probably wasn't the right term, you're explanation is more along the lines of what I meant. YOU REMIND ME OF MY FUCKING DAD. (again, a compliment) It's just I know you're even younger than me, probably by a decade. It just crazy how different people are, and why they are that way.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on February 06, 2017, 02:41:46 pm
The internet removes age/appearance as a basis for making decisions/conclusions, which significantly changes perception. Totally changes how one perceives the words written. I often find myself surprised when I find out everyone isn't exactly the same age as me... But that's enough circlejerking lol.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on February 06, 2017, 03:00:57 pm
Well, I think Wilshire's general pragmatism and literalism is a good temper for the rest of our (often) fantasticism and analyticism.  (Yeah, some of those aren't actually words.)

This is important, because if sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, then also, sometimes it's not?

Like most things in life, balance is probably pretty key.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Wilshire on February 06, 2017, 03:33:52 pm
When Moenghus blinded himself, he sheared away his spirit, his identity -- the things which made him different from Kellhus -- thereby becoming a kind of reflecting pool for his son. This is why the conversation between two is so hotly debated and interpretive.

Kellhus is quite literally having a conversation with himself. He went down into the Nonman Mansion to do precisely what Nonmen do -- reflect upon himself.


Back to the OP.

This is an interesting point, given the revelations of TGO regarding Kellhus being not so much a person but a Place and/or a slave to TTT. Seems that Kellhus did to himself what you described Moe as. Maybe they both ended up at about the same place after 30 years of being in the Three Seas.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: H on February 06, 2017, 04:54:31 pm
When Moenghus blinded himself, he sheared away his spirit, his identity -- the things which made him different from Kellhus -- thereby becoming a kind of reflecting pool for his son. This is why the conversation between two is so hotly debated and interpretive.

Kellhus is quite literally having a conversation with himself. He went down into the Nonman Mansion to do precisely what Nonmen do -- reflect upon himself.


Back to the OP.

This is an interesting point, given the revelations of TGO regarding Kellhus being not so much a person but a Place and/or a slave to TTT. Seems that Kellhus did to himself what you described Moe as. Maybe they both ended up at about the same place after 30 years of being in the Three Seas.

And yet we are presented with the idea that blindness provides insight and revelation.

Or is it that Moe's blindness turns him into the prototypical Dunyain?  So Kellhus' advantage is that he can "be more?"
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: Monkhound on February 06, 2017, 05:03:40 pm
Other similarities:
- Nonmen go into the Deep when they start breaking. Kellhus isn't that mentally stable when he enters Kyudea.
- The Nonmen are losing their sense of self. So does Kellhus (on the tree in Caraskand), with the difference that he has experienced the loss of self earlier (during his apprenticeship in Ishual), possibly making it possible for him to survive.
- Nonmen forget who they are. Their memories are everywhere and at any time they've ever been at at once. Kellhus is described as a Place, everywhere he needs to be.
- Kellhus goes into Kyudea guided by, and meeting, his father: Moënghus, the father, dies. Oinaral is going into the Deep of Ishoriol, guided by Sorweel/the Amiolas, to look for his father Oirunas: Oinaral, the son, dies.
Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: MSJ on February 06, 2017, 05:51:09 pm
The internet removes age/appearance as a basis for making decisions/conclusions, which significantly changes perception. Totally changes how one perceives the words written. I often find myself surprised when I find out everyone isn't exactly the same age as me... But that's enough circlejerking lol.

We love ya Wilshire, but I will not participate in any circle-Jerks, lol. Indeed, back to the OA, sorry when thoughts come I speak, or write, or post.😀

I for some reason, believe we're not done with Moe, just a hunch. Isn't Meppa, could be who Kellhus sees in his visions though. Why I say this, is a point Madness brought up from TGO. That Kellhus that it a mistake to kill his father, though he never killed Moe, Cnäuir did. And, as I said in the slog, I think he wanted salted by Cnäuir, he knew Cnäuir would have his choral, that's for certain.

Title: Re: Reassessing the confrontation between Moe and Kellhus
Post by: mrganondorf on March 08, 2017, 04:01:11 am
CRACKIN' POTS: (This post actually started in the "Meppa's Role" thread, but it ended up becoming huge and sort of a different topic, so I made a new thread for it -- I may get around to talking about how the hell I think Meppa actually fits into this...some day).

Moenghus was and still is, in some capacity, actually helping Kellhus achieve his "destiny"...whatever that may be, as glimpsed by Moenghus and seemingly grasped by Kellhus. After all, practically the whole of PoN is a story of Kellhus gradually realizing that the World has been conditioned by his father, and while Kellhus is certainly aware of this, he nonetheless behaves as if he has, well, free will for lack of a better word (this arguably becomes blurry after the Umiaki Miracle).

Really, though, I think a great deal of the confusion comes from a misunderstanding of what the Psukhe is, what the Water is, what the intended meaning of Passion is, and most of all what a soul is. Near the beginning of TGO, when Achamian has the dream of Shauriatas (which we've had access to from the original first excerpt, back in 2013) he mentions the complexity of souls for a good reason:

Quote
“But souls are exceedingly complicated,” he continued. “Far more so than the crude sorceries used to trap them. The intricacies of identity are always sheared away. Memory. Faculty. Character. These are cast into the pit... Only the most base urges survive in proxies.”

There's an undeniable influence of Gnostic Christian myth & theology in the series (particularly when it comes to a lot of the subtleties in Earwa's metaphysics), and one glance at a Gnostic "diagram of a soul/spirit" should give an idea that complexity:

(http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_mistic/gnosismontalk_02.jpg)

I'm not going to even try puzzling all that out with exact metaphysical analogues from TSA, in part simply because I'm not inclined to believe the metaphysics are fully analogous, but it is a jumping point of sorts.

Getting more to the point, I think a clarification of a few central topics may elucidate some facets of this discussion (or what may be clarifications in my own opinion, anyhow).

The Distinction between Soul & Spirit
This is more or less straight from Gnostic thought, but it appears in plenty of other belief systems in various forms. In common parlance, these words often used interchangeably, but with the metaphysics of Earwa, I think the defining the two notions is key to understanding, well, all sorts of shit in the series.

Basically, the Soul is akin to an exotic form of matter (or energy) which acts as the substrate for the Spirit. What Achamian describes as "the intricacies of identity" -- memory, faculty, character -- are in fact the Spirit of an individual. The things that make you, me, and Napoleon different people.

Souls, on the other hand, are not only identical but are actually the same thing from the same source (again, not unlike the way that all of our own brains are ultimately just made of atoms that once came from stars, etc.). It's useful to think of souls in the singular. Consciousness is encoded in the substrate of matter. Spirits are written on the substrate of Soul.

The Water is Soul, the primordial "sea" from which all Soul originated and, eventually, returned to.

Better yet, just think about the Force from Star Wars. The majority of people that die in Star Wars just...die, like regular humans. But in the case of "great sorcerors" like Obi-Wan, Yoda, Anakin, they are able to retain some remnant of their Spirit (identity) even after death, because reasons.

(Also, don't get too attached to the exact phrasing I'm using here because I'm pretty sure things are, as always, a bit more complicated. I'm just going for the main jist of my point here).

So, given all of the above, we can reassess the nature of the Psukhe, a school of sorcery that relies solely on passion. For the sake of expediency, and I will now rattle off a list of my current interpretations of what's going on in a way that may sound like it's totally supported by textual evidence, or as if I think I actually know precisely what's going on. The former is debatable, and the latter is hilariously untrue.

-The Cishaurim, through the art of the Pskuhe and ritualistic blinding, work to strip themselves of a "Self" (identity, spirit) and open their Third Eye (the Heart, seat of the Soul), a conduit to the primordial sea of Souls, called the Water.

-Because the Cishaurim have no Self/Spirit/Identity (or at least a very stunted one), they are also invisible to the gods -- also, by weaponizing pure Soul for their sorcery, it leaves no Mark on World.

-In addition (or alternatively), The God(s?) are blind to the Cishaurim, because by removing their eyes (Windows to the Soul), they've broken the Circuit of Watcher and Watched. It should also be noted that at least one of the reasons the Cishaurim use snakes as their symbiotic sensory apparatus is because snakes traditionally have very poor version, instead relying on taste/scent and thermal detection. This supports the relevance of the Circuit of Watcher and Watched --  the implication is that snakes are chosen deliberately because they do not rely on optical senses. After all, if you're going to use an animal surrogate for lost vision, why wouldn't you use something that's actually better at seeing? Like birds for example...

-The text is deliberately misguiding about the Psukhe and true the extent of the Cishaurim's abilities (or any one else who can tap into the Water for that matter -- I don't believe it's exclusive to the Cish). What the Psukhe lacks in raw power it makes up for in subtly, illusion, scrying, dreamwalking, etc. Because of the employment of a traditional, western concept of the Male Gaze through which the series is (mostly) told, and from the patriarchal society of the Three Seas, the Psukhe is disregarded as inferior, and Cishaurim as abominations so "Other" that barely anyone even tries to understand them. This is, of course, just about the worst possible way to approach the Cish, an institution that's seemingly founded on techniques of subterfuge, misinformation, and working as invisibly as possible. Like a spy organization...


- Contrary to first impressions, the Cishaurim are actually an ideal fit for a Dunyain. The text implies that because of the Dunyain’s “stunted emotions”, the Psukhe was a poor choice for Moenghus. But this is misguided, since as we know, the “passion” that drives the Psukhe is actually the most base parts of the Soul -- which are not so much stunted by the Dunyain as mastered by them.



Conclusion

The climactic confrontation between Kellhus and Moenghus in TTT can be thought of as akin to the scene in The Empire Strikes Back, when Luke is training on Dagobah and ventures down into the cavern. At first, he seems to find Vader down there, confronts him, and defeats him, only for it to be revealed that it was himself all along.

It’s been theorized many times that what makes Kellhus special is that he doesn’t just read faces -- he reads souls. This is why the people that contend with him are broken/enlightened based entirely on truths about themselves.

When Moenghus blinded himself, he sheared away his spirit, his identity -- the things which made him different from Kellhus -- thereby becoming a kind of reflecting pool for his son. This is why the conversation between two is so hotly debated and interpretive.

Kellhus is quite literally having a conversation with himself. He went down into the Nonman Mansion to do precisely what Nonmen do -- reflect upon himself.

And because Moenghus had made a mirror of himself for Kellhus, it allowed Kellhus the opportunity to glimpse the Darkness that Comes Before him, which is very well symbolized when Cnaiur and Serwe approach from behind moments before he uses the Cant of Transposition.


Bonus:
The Scylvendi’s swazond are, in fact, an example of what Achamian calls “the crude sorceries used to trap” souls. This is part of what makes Cnaiur so powerful and age-defying. By capturing the raw soul of his victims, he actually makes his own soul stronger.






WELP YOU ARE AWESOME