[Baztek]

So any ideas why skin-spies are mysteriously absent from the TTT glossary? I guess if the TTT glossary is supposed to be read as an historical document it makes sense, since skin-spies are a new creation of the Tekne, but I've never actually been told that by Bakker or anyone else on this board. So what gives?

This isn't really that big of a deal, I'm just trying to spark some conversation in this lovely forum of ours

[Callan S.]

Omg, I just got this sudden flash that the glossary is written from some god like perspective and they can't see skin spies...but sranc are mentioned in there, aren't they? So dang, that was such a loopy perspective to suddenly see it from, but it's probably not valid...

[Wilshire]

Probably because skin-spy's where supposed to be a surprise and Bakker didn't want to give anything away to someone who happend to hat the glossary on their first read... Or maybe he forgot lol.

[Madness]

So any ideas why skin-spies are mysteriously absent from the TTT glossary? I guess if the TTT glossary is supposed to be read as an historical document it makes sense, since skin-spies are a new creation of the Tekne, but I've never actually been told that by Bakker or anyone else on this board. So what gives?

This isn't really that big of a deal, I'm just trying to spark some conversation in this lovely forum of ours

+1 the bold. I figure that the Glossary Encyclopaedia Futurus will feature the Skin-Spies as they are more commonly known by TAE.

No frowns, Baztek... we've built it, the posters will come .