[What Came Before]

Just thought I'd make a sticky about suggestions. Feel free to post here, PM, or e-mail me with ideas and criticisms about the running and organization of the forum.

[Wilshire]

In the advent of the new board I thought it may be worthwhile to consider a slight change. Much of conversation in TUC board, I think, should be moved to the WLW. We as a community have kind of decided that each dedicated board contains the spoilers up to the reading of that book. As such, I think now that TUC is coming soon (hopefully), and since in light of the entire forum move, I think it might be a good idea to move the topics to WLW.

That way we can still discuss the WLW stuff without fear of TUC spoilers, since, by design, TUC board will be discussing the book. It will be a bit awkward for some time after TUC is released, in regards to what is/isn't spoiler tagged. If the conversation where moved to WLW, then this could be somewhat alleviated. Those interested in continuing the conversation about WLW could do so, and those sufficiently worried about spoilers would be able to avoid TUC board until they finished reading.

Hopefully you havent moved to much yet, I wouldn't want to have to do it twice.

[What Came Before]

What you see is what you get, Wilshire, so far . I did one session of motion, most of the forums with the least posts. I'm setting my sights for TUC and Misc. next, and I might hazard another episode tonight before bed (though, it's been a two jobs long day and I have a Latin exam tomorrow within another two jobs day) - quite unprepared.

I think it shall be so.

[Baztek]

Madness, dumb question, but have you already advertised this board on Westeros? Not sure if they frown upon that. Breaking into tight-knit communities can be very difficult, and I'd hate to think we missed out on some great discussion because tentative members don't feel like breaking into what looks like an insular community. Not that we are, but you get the picture.

[What Came Before]

Lol.

Short answer, yes. It's my sig there and in the past I've earned myself some reprimands for plugging the original SA in excess (by members, never moderation) - I can't help that our discussions here encompass and exceed those at Westeros and thus beg to be referenced . It's the nature of using an entire forum to discuss Bakker rather than one thread.

But again, this rendition of Second Apocalypse is an official bid to attract engage membership - I've upped the ante considerably, I think.

[Wilshire]

I love all the available stats that are there to be seen. Any chance of more? Like some kind of traffic/log-on statistics?

[Madness]

Hmm... I'm not sure, Wilshire. I shall do some poking around.

[Wilshire]

Just noticed that there is an "Average online per day" listed, which is kind of what I was asking for. Its close to 17, which I find interesting. I wonder how its calculated? I could believe that there are 17 unique visits per day if it counts the guests, since half are likely just spam-sranc. That brings the count closer to 10 or 8, which seems reasonable.

[Madness]

Does it include guests, I wonder?

[Wilshire]

Not sure who's suggestion it was, but whoever said it would be a good idea to have a topic that labled "Unholy consult release date" or something similar, you where right. Its nearly the top viewed topic on the site with nearly 1500 views. That topic has certainly drawn a couple people here. Hopefully some of them has stuck around.

[Madness]

Curethan, who has been Erratic for far too long .

It's the second hit on google for "Unholy Consult release date."

[Wilshire]

is there a posted list of all the titles based on post counts somewhere?

[Madness]

Top Ten count in the More Stats like at the bottom of the frontpage...

I don't understand why you and I don't have more comprehensive statistics.

[Wilshire]

Nah I mean like:

newbie:0
Jr. Member:50
Full Member:100
Sr. Member:250

etc.

[Madness]

You're pretty cool, buddy.

You should be able to see them: Admin, Members, Membergroups.

We should edit them .