I think sight is blindness, because sight enforces self-deception.
Sight does not come before. Darkness comes before.
In other words blindness comes before.
The whole dunyain mythos of "the darkness that comes before" is basically an explicit textual statement of the value of blindness and the centrality of blindness as a highly regarded dunyain value.
If that is in fact the case, then as Blackstone mentions, why aren't all the Dunyain blind? To me that seems like a pretty large leap of faith to say darkness=blindness. Aren't you taking something completely metaphorical (ie darkness - meaning ignorance and/or something unknowable) and equating it with something narrow and concrete?
Why does darkness = blindness from the Dunyain perspective? Why not darkness = caves, deep oceans, black skinned peoples, night, black bears, or any other noun that is dark, if darkness has to be anything so specific?
If they meant, specifically, that "blindness comes before", wouldn't they have just gone with that instead of bothers with the vague metaphor of darkness? That doesn't make sense to me.
It
explicitly says darkness, which you are interpreting through a chain of reasoning to equate to blindness. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but wouldnt that be an implicit reference? (not that the distinction is important since I know what you're saying and I'm probably wrong since I'm no good at word games).
We have instances of blind people just being blind people, like Xin. And also, non-blind people being special, like Sorweel or pick anyone else. What necessitates the blind connection to Dunyain mythos and their specialness in Earwa?
Anyway, the first thing you said is that sight=blindness.
So you're saying sight=blindness, blindness=darkness, therefore sight="the darkness that comes before"?
. Again just playing with your words.
The thousandfold thought is described as a rule change to replace one religious lie with a new religious lie, it is not making new reality, it is facilitating a population belief shift.
Which is great, except that Earwa is a meaningful world. Wouldn't that make a popular belief shift far more important? Also, see below
I think subjective makes reality theories are way off and directly refuted by the text in kellhus and aurangs conversation.
Then what does a 'meaningful world' actually mean? Or are you saying Earwa is functionally the same as our meaningless world? I admit, its not a topic I understand at all, so I could use a bit of a primer on your thoughts.
Iirc, we know the dunyain manipulate sensory deprivation, seemingly specifically highlighting blindness from the trial of the thousand thousand halls kellhus obliquely refers to.
They certainly do, but why is blindness the most important thing here? I don't remember the timeline exactly, but is the thousand thousand halls trial the first major trial or the last? I thought the "the logos is without beginning or end" mantra meditation was the culmination of the dunyain training.
If TTH is the final trial, then its a fair point. In that case, I'd argue its just a physical challenge to further test them, rather than the blindness itself being whats important, but I don't think there's any way to reconcile our two POVs in this particular instance.