Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - tekne

Pages: [1] 2
General Misc. / Re: What else are you into?
« on: January 08, 2014, 01:48:07 pm »
very interesting and in ways  inspiring thread! keep 'em coming ...

General Earwa / Re: Kellhus in Modern Times
« on: January 08, 2014, 01:29:14 pm »
It is not a mystery nowadays - that such  communities as Dunians exist  in every long-lasting philosophical \either religious  traditions worldwide and they occasionally dwell on human society  ,but never dominate over it - because they would have to deal with it on daily basis, where their first condition is to permanently stay away of contaminating /corrupting factors -such as human society in general .  Conscience of adepts   is wiped off subjective fragments of psyche/mind  - that very state lets them grasp phenomenas of Universe (such as mind of regular human) as it is (without extractions and deceptions)   Good examples are Taoist(Zen) internal schools of Wu Shu

General Earwa / Re: TSA related art and stuff.
« on: October 12, 2013, 12:27:44 pm »

And water-bearer is definetly a baad-ass!

General Earwa / Re: TSA related art and stuff.
« on: October 11, 2013, 12:17:33 am »
outsiders should be "cosmic"  that's right Buck!

General Earwa / Re: TSA related art and stuff.
« on: October 10, 2013, 11:27:16 pm »
truly superb lines


General Earwa / Re: TSA related art and stuff.
« on: October 02, 2013, 10:43:56 pm »
this is an EPIC depiction of bashrag     -such depth! given (to one of the plainest! characters)
extremely Expressive!
Atmoshere depicted..

-Reality, afterall, is a function of detail.-
let's discuss nuances of another  Bakker's statement,shall we?

real neat talking to You! and other participants.. it's really warming  that Bakker has somehow brought together, different but not alien us)

thank you! for the excursus(for I am less in western philosophy myself than the ancient india's) but I am pretty sure those similariies  in doctrines are not coincidental..not many have heard of such symbiote to ever exist

13 connection with the next statement 'Thus we shall define the soul as follows: that which precedes everything'  (hope no little smth is missing here):)
we shall comprehend it ,so that if something that happened was understood before or simultaneously , then it was possible to accomplish by means of "soul vision" (like 'buddhi' of Patanjali darshana)only;  -thus we can define the soul as follows: that which "pre-sees" everything

 Spasibo(thank you guys),  btw ,Madness,  that "if" thing has helped a lot ))

"It is only after that we understand what has come before, then we understand nothing."
give your vision, how  you do comprehend this statement !please!
we are having trouble in interpreting  it to other language...

Pages: [1] 2