« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2013, 02:00:10 pm »
Also, I had never really noted before how much of this dream circulates on SEEING. But then also, his eyes are SHINING in one version, and who do we know SHINES in the third SIGHT? What do you see Celmomas? And since there are three italics changes and one of them is simply the word "see" I think we're being directed to concentrate on the seeing (or not-seeing) in this dream. What does it mean to "see" the future anyway? Does he see as the White Luck Warrior sees? And note that on his death it is not a 'tunnel of light' that is so popular in western culture currently, but an awareness of "being watched" what are readers of a novel other than watchers? (but perhaps that's too meta?)
This reminds me of Kelmomas in WLW. When he kills people, he looks into their eyes, and his inner narration talks about some external watcher that comes with death that he sees within.
Coming back to both this thought on Kelmomas, but also looking at the prophecy and noting how much it circulates and centralizes on SEEING as a motif (what do you see!) I was struck by this key passage of Kellhus' first onscreen Imprompta in The Warrior Prophet. Perhaps this sheds some light on Kelmomas, but also points us to the failure of the Mandate since the Consult "disappeared". That is to say, the Mandate--particularly Achamian--has stopped witnessing the apocalypse and instead only see it. They no longer testify. In fact the beginning of this chapter begins with the beguiling thought that Achamian had SEEN too much war, not witnessed, simply SEEN. And also note that this selection ends with Achamian quoting the Mandate motto, (actually it ends with him mentally deciding Esmenet is equal to Kellhus, or that's the beginning of a similar series of hagiographic thoughts on her). The fact that this story leads Achamian to thinking about the "gain the whole world but lose your soul" indicates to a degree that Kellhus was conditioning Achamian with this story. To an extent--this is where Kellhus begins to plan to send Achamian away from him, Compendium of the First Holy War is a testament, a witness, it is a seeing that is meaningful. And for it to be taken as legitimate, for the seeing to become witness to become testament, Kellhus needed to send Achamian away from him, at this point Kellhus probably plans to use Esmenet for leverage against Achamian to force this issue. (and note that Achamian's testimony, his book, is crucial in persuading many elite that though Kellhus may be thought of as a god, he is really just a man, not a god, and more importantly, not a demon, the Yatwerians rely on calling Kellhus demon, but this natural progression of refuting his godhood by calling him demon is preemptively castrated by Achamian's hostile testimony, his assertion of Kellhus' humanness is more credible than the cult's assertion that there enemies are demons). All this and more--jesus fucking christ this passage is incredibly suggestive RE the No God and the demise of the No God--begins here in this passage, which, as I said, I feel is directly connected to the Celmomian prophecy and it's motif of Seeing which connects to the Mandate's imperative to not just see the apocalypse but WITNESS the apocalypse and so Witnessing they are mandated to TESTIFY about the apocalypse.
“What happened?” Kellhus asked.
The nameless knight smiled, but there was a strange and subtle incongruence in his expression, something like glimpsing the difference between white eyes and yellow teeth.
“Three days ago,” the man said, “our lord heard rumour of a village some miles to the west, so we rode out, hoping for plunder …”
Kellhus nodded. “And what did you find?”
“Nothing … I mean, no village. Our lord was wroth. He claims the others—”
“What did you find?”
The man blinked. Panic flashed from the stoic weariness of his expression. “A child,” he said hoarsely. “A dead child … We were following this trail, something worn by goatherds, I think, cutting across this hillside, and there was just this dead child, a girl, no more than five or six, lying in our path. Her throat had been cut …”
“What happened next?”
“Nothing … I mean, we simply ignored her, continued riding as though she were nothing more than discarded cloth … a-a scrap of leather in the dust,” he added, his voice breaking. He looked down to his callused palms.
“Guilt and shame wrack you by day,” Kellhus said, “the feeling that you’ve committed some mortal crime. Nightmares wrack you by night … She speaks to you.”
The man’s nod was almost comical in its desperation. He hadn’t, Achamian realized, the nerve for war.
“But why?” he cried. “I mean, how many dead have we seen?”
“But not all seeing,” Kellhus replied, “is witness.”
“I don’t understand …”
“Witness is the seeing that testifies, that judges so that it may be judged. You saw, and you judged. A trespass had been committed, an innocent had been murdered. You saw this.”
“Yes!” the man hissed. “A little girl. A little girl!”
“And now you suffer.”
“But why?” he cried. “Why should I suffer? She’s not mine. She was heathen!”
“Everywhere … Everywhere we’re surrounded by the blessed and the cursed, the sacred and the profane. But our hearts are like hands, they grow callous to the world. And yet, like our hands even the most callous heart will blister if overworked or chafed by something new. For some time we may feel the pinch, but we ignore it because we have so much work to do.” Kellhus had looked down into his right hand. Suddenly he balled it into a fist, raised it high. “And then one strike, with a hammer or a sword, and the blister breaks, our heart is torn. And then we suffer, for we feel the ache for the blessed, the sting of the cursed. We no longer see, we witness …”
His luminous eyes settled upon the nameless knight. Blue and wise.
“This is what has happened to you.”
“Yes … Yes! B-but what should I do?”
“Rejoice.”
“Rejoice? But I suffer!”
“Yes, rejoice! The callused hand cannot feel the lover’s cheek. When we witness, we testify, and when we testify we make ourselves responsible for what we see. And that— that— is what it means to belong.”
Kellhus suddenly stood, leapt from the low platform, took two breathtaking steps into their midst. “Make no mistake,” he continued, and the air thrummed with the resonance of his voice. “This world owns you. You belong, whether you want to or not. Why do we suffer? Why do the wretched take their own lives? Because the world, no matter how cursed, owns us. Because we belong.
“Should we celebrate suffering?” a challenging voice called. From somewhere …
Prince Kellhus smiled, glancing into the darkness. “Then it’s no longer suffering, is it?”
The small congregation laughed.
“No,” Kellhus continued, “that’s not what I mean. Celebrate the meaning of suffering. Rejoice that you belong, not that you suffer. Remember what the Latter Prophet teaches us: glory comes in joy and sorrow. Joy and sorrow …”
“I s-see see the wisdom of you-your words, Prince,” the nameless knight stammered. “I truly see! But …”
And somehow, Achamian could feel his question …
What is there to gain?
“I’m not asking you to see,” Kellhus said. “I’m asking you to witness.”
Blank face. Desolate eyes. The nameless knight blinked, and two tears silvered his cheek. Then he smiled, and nothing, it seemed, could be so glorious.
“To make myself …” His voice quavered, broke. “To m-make …”
“To be one with the world in which you dwell,” Kellhus said. “To make a covenant of your life.”
The world … You will gain the world.
Bakker, R. Scott (2008-09-02). The Warrior Prophet: The Prince of Nothing, Book Two (Kindle Locations 4395-4412). Penguin Group. Kindle Edition.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2013, 02:03:10 pm by Madness »

Logged